Suggestion for esg

ExoduSSpt

ixneD wrote: »

I find this funny because of how many local sport clubs and groups have 1-3 matches a week, sometimes 2 in one day, and people with jobs and families can still make it to the majority of their games.

^^^^^^^^^^^

agree with this 1000000%

TwoCute

ixneD wrote: »

I find this funny because of how many local sport clubs and groups have 1-3 matches a week, sometimes 2 in one day, and people with jobs and families can still make it to the majority of their games.

People will show up to their games if there's a prize worth playing for. Playing matches just for bragging rights isn't going to work.

imERICK

esahcx wrote: »

If it's a majority "tournament", then I'd say just one match per week. Some of us have jobs, or other plans.

If it's just a cup, or something small then sure? Sounds confusing, but the fact is itself.

I honestly think it needs to be something in a length of 6-9 week regular season.
That way you can have 12-15 matches, The more the better i say..

[Denxi]

TwoCute wrote: »

People will show up to their games if there's a prize worth playing for. Playing matches just for bragging rights isn't going to work.

Or maybe you could play matches because you enjoy playing CF with and against skilled people and people you know.

Fun is an option, right?

FG_VERMAX

ixneD wrote: »

I find this funny because of how many local sport clubs and groups have 1-3 matches a week, sometimes 2 in one day, and people with jobs and families can still make it to the majority of their games.

it's pretty hard asking your boss off for work because you have to play a video game. just ceyhan port black widow.

Datkizzle

JayKeith wrote: »

2-3 matches a week would be good for a couple of reasons. Would likely help give an 8 man roster a chance to let everyone on the roster play. Less time to practice for each map. I don't think people should need a week to prepare for one match.

it's only a 7-man.

imERICK

4mDatkid wrote: »

it's only a 7-man.

Where was this confirmed?

Datkizzle

BROimERICK wrote: »

Where was this confirmed?

Don't worry about that.

imERICK

4mDatkid wrote: »

Don't worry about that.

So really you have no idea what you're talking about.
Cool

Datkizzle

BROimERICK wrote: »

So really you have no idea what you're talking about.
Cool

I have the conformation that I need, and dont need to prove anything to YOU.

The question is still in the air, it will most likely be 7.

imERICK

4mdatkid wrote: »

the question is still in the air, it will most likely be 7.

. .

throneofGod

hey if this league fails you could simply turn your site to another p0rnhub equivalent. I'm sure Erotic Sugar Grannies will be much more of a success