Where are the next legends at??
Comments
-
Classic, I remember him telling me his dad owns a soccer stadium and he was planning to build a lan centre in his house----> rofl
Was calling trippy a squid because he qqs about how bad this game is when in reality hes just bad at the game
LOLOL.
He also told me a long story about how he smoked spice & sees numbers everywhere & im just like waaaat m8? -
Classic, I remember him telling me his dad owns a soccer stadium and he was planning to build a lan centre in his house----> rofl
Was calling trippy a squid because he qqs about how bad this game is when in reality hes just bad at the game
But why squid? -
-
Ellustrial wrote: »lmfao flick is alright but we were a long shot? pretty sure we did just as good as Alpha 5 against Kanata.
10-8, 10-6, 10-4, and 10-4
all with changing our roster every week, and practicing like every other day. if we were lucky.
its incredibly easy to be at the top of this game, but good enough people will never dedicate to a roster.
Sounds like you are bragging about losing to ACE. They were knifing you on cast... -
Theres only so much that a monitor is going to help your shot, on internationals most of the computers are 60hz. Game sense can always be improved as well as your head lining, nades, etc.Quick question, do any top players use a 60hz monitor? because every top player I've seen has a 120/144 Hz and I'm starting to wonder how much it helps. I have a pretty good shot and I'm wondering if there's not much more room to grow as a 60hz user.Sounds like you are bragging about losing to ACE. They were knifing you on cast...
Edit- wait wasnt that bio? -
bertman_1g wrote: »yes in esg. If it wasnt for mateusz (carbon wouldnt of ever been caught) kanata would be a 4th place team in our version and wouldnt be going anywhere besides their local lans.
"If it wasn't" .... oh shut up already kid you and all the old top inferior teams are not even close to the pro meta game any more, stop living in the past and try harder next time.. after your ban is lifted of course.
Btw: I would post an actual accurate player and team analysis from my private archives but the community is definitely not ready for it. -
"If it wasn't" .... oh shut up already kid you and all the old top inferior teams are not even close to the pro meta game any more, stop living in the past and try harder next time.. after your ban is lifted of course.
Btw: I would post an actual accurate player and team analysis from my private archives but the community is definitely not ready for it.
"pro meta game". Id say it has significantly dropped in the past year. If it wasn't true you'd probably be winning more than 1 match in international play kid, but sadly thats how it's going to stay each time you go. You have no shots, just great teamwork. -
bertman_1g wrote: »"pro meta game". Id say it has significantly dropped in the past year. If it wasn't true you'd probably be winning more than 1 match in international play kid, but sadly thats how it's going to stay each time you go. You have no shots, just great teamwork.
-
bertman_1g wrote: »"pro meta game". Id say it has significantly dropped in the past year. If it wasn't true you'd probably be winning more than 1 match in international play kid, but sadly thats how it's going to stay each time you go. You have no shots, just great teamwork.
I believe you meant to say ping.
-
bertman_1g wrote: »"pro meta game". Id say it has significantly dropped in the past year. If it wasn't true you'd probably be winning more than 1 match in international play kid, but sadly thats how it's going to stay each time you go. You have no shots, just great teamwork.
Id disagree and agree with you, the teamwork is out of this world but the shots are still here when you look at ayrin and malice. Not so sure about the rest but they are not underpar
Back to what malte said. There reeeaally is nothing to be so private about an evaluation in this community 90% of it doesnt know how it should be played or have the mentality to play it well, the other 10% would be worngfully evaluated because youd be evaluating them based on your external perspective of their performance in a diluted community of clueless individuals. -
bertman_1g wrote: »"pro meta game". Id say it has significantly dropped in the past year. If it wasn't true you'd probably be winning more than 1 match in international play kid, but sadly thats how it's going to stay each time you go. You have no shots, just great teamwork.
I'm reading something along the lines of "I am a cheater and will never make an int. cap ever again"
Why must I argue semantics you're a joke.
P.S - No shot lol what? -
Sounds like you are bragging about losing to ACE. They were knifing you on cast...
I will never brag about losing. Saying, however, that we are "significantly worse than ____" when we do just as well or better as that same team is foolish. And, to my knowledge, nobody was knifed on our team.
I think Malte is a joke, but to say that "Kanata would be 2nd/3rd/4th" is a moot point when they are the undisputed best at the moment. -
bertman_1g wrote: »I dont think you can call anybody a joke bud
you cant just post something like that and not give us that storyEllustrial wrote: »I will never brag about losing. Saying, however, that we are "significantly worse than ____" when we do just as well or better as that same team is foolish. And, to my knowledge, nobody was knifed on our team.
The thing is xotek, youve been hyping yourself and your teams up since day 1 and still nothing to show for it. -
Ellustrial wrote: »I will never brag about losing. Saying, however, that we are "significantly worse than ____" when we do just as well or better as that same team is foolish. And, to my knowledge, nobody was knifed on our team.
I think Malte is a joke, but to say that "Kanata would be 2nd/3rd/4th" is a moot point when they are the undisputed best at the moment.
It's not foolish to say that. If two teams lose to kanata by the same margin, you still can't make a comparison based off that.
That's like saying since the pacers beat the heat and the 76ers beat the pacers, the 76ers are better than the heat. Doesn't make sense right?
In my h0nest opinion, if you would have played Alpha5 you still would have been destroyed. Doesn't matter about the scores against ACE. I don't mean to bash you or your team here... i actually thought you guys had potential, but realistically i don't think exertus was comparable to Alpha5. -
In my h0nest opinion, if you would have played Alpha5 you still would have been destroyed. Doesn't matter about the scores against ACE. I don't mean to bash you or your team here... i actually thought you guys had potential, but realistically i don't think exertus was comparable to Alpha5.
We played Alpha 5, with a ringer. Our first map we lost 10-8, and our second map we lost 10-7.
The thing is xotek, youve been hyping yourself and your teams up since day 1 and still nothing to show for it.
I'll wholeheartedly support any team I'm on. We're better than all of y'all, pssh, we're going to China. Just wait till we practice, you're going down. I certainly don't think anyone takes grandiose claims without any substance seriously.
That said, it's hard to argue with results, and I certainly don't think that there's "nothing to show for it".
Caliber1 placed 2nd in the CFS qualifier (we lost in overtime against Kanata in the regular bracket, and then got crushed in the finals). The Undaunted and the subsequent Exertus rosters have taken more rounds off of Kanata than any teams other than tsgh.
With that said, obviously we had hoped to do better. But I fail to see how me jokingly saying "pssh, the only thing holding us back is mouse acceleration" places any keel on the fact that we recently had obliterated every team other than Kanata, Alpha 5, and a random loss to Player Slayer.
Edit: By the way,
Outside of those losses, the only single map we dropped - to any team - was on Black Widow to Bio, in OT. No excuses, but that was our first time ever playing BW as a team. Our scores on the maps we'd practiced?
http://i.imgur.com/sOaCQ6y.png
http://i.imgur.com/HhhEYlu.png -
Ellustrial wrote: »We played Alpha 5, with a ringer. Our first map we lost 10-8, and our second map we lost 10-7.
I'll wholeheartedly support any team I'm on. We're better than all of y'all, pssh, we're going to China. Just wait till we practice, you're going down. I certainly don't think anyone takes grandiose claims without any substance seriously.
That said, it's hard to argue with results, and I certainly don't think that there's "nothing to show for it".
Caliber1 placed 2nd in the CFS qualifier (we lost in overtime against Kanata in the regular bracket, and then got crushed in the finals). The Undaunted and the subsequent Exertus rosters have taken more rounds off of Kanata than any teams other than tsgh.
With that said, obviously we had hoped to do better. But I fail to see how me jokingly saying "pssh, the only thing holding us back is mouse acceleration" places any keel on the fact that we recently had obliterated every team other than Kanata, Alpha 5, and a random loss to Player Slayer.
Edit: By the way,
Outside of those losses, the only single map we dropped - to any team - was on Black Widow to Bio, in OT. No excuses, but that was our first time ever playing BW as a team. Our scores on the maps we'd practiced?
http://i.imgur.com/sOaCQ6y.png
http://i.imgur.com/HhhEYlu.png
You're honestly horrible stop talking 2/10 for making me reply -
lel
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 710 CrossFire Announcements
- 712 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 320 Community
- 12 Modes
- 393 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 73 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 524 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 37 CrossFire Off Topic