Quick scoping vs regular sniping

which is better and more pro


when i say regular sniping i mean like flick shot or something
«134

Comments

  • As long as you get the kill, it doesnt matter.

    However, Quickscoping is considered "more pro"
  • One gets you called a camper or 'hard-scoper', despite being the more realistic and traditional way to use a sniper, limiting your field of vision making you have to rely on your other senses and notifiers of enemies.

    Others usually involve a dot on your screen and the skill-less abuse of a 1-hit kill rifle's perfect accuracy for less than a second. The traditional COD killing way of using a sniper. Considered 'pro'.

    You decide.
  • Quick scoping isn't considered sniping, let alone pro sniping. Quick scoping is merely bypassing the inaccuracy of a sniper rifle out of scope by quickly scoping in and switch to a secondary weapon. The scope isn't used to aim in any way, and instead the "sniper" used the center of his screen to aim at his opponent and relying on the overwhelming power of his rifle to kill, even when merely grazing a opponent's arm.

    Quick scopers are mobile cannons, and not snipers.
  • Quick scope allows you to switch to a different weaopn, (Pistol, Melee weapon, or a grenade). You can use those items to your advantage, but if you just normally scope, only gets sniper.
  • It depends on how much fps you have and how you feel with the sniper. I don't really care if somebody hard scopes or quickscopes me. The only important part is getting the kill. You might be in a situation where It's a 1v4. You get the three with quickscopes, no scopes, hardscopes, etc. but if you miss the 4th guy, it's still a loss. Sure it's a 3k and a good record, but this game is a team based game (unless ffa). So it's best if you guarantee a kill rather than risking a loss.
  • I think a balance between the two is ultimately the best. If I'm sniping an obvious choke point from long range where opponents are bound to run out, I'm gonna hard scope that choke point and wait. When I hear someone flanking me or getting close, I will turn around fast and quickscope their ass.

    Why is either less valid then the other? Sure, the realism argument against QSing is there but this isn't real life. You can bet your ass if a sniper IRL could effectively quickscope they'd be doing it. I can't help it if the game mechanics allow me to snipe in a less then realistic fashion.

    Don't hate the player, hate the game... mechanics :3
  • I don't qs and i don't hs. I have a own Way to kill people with my fr.
    I scope and than i quckly move to the guy i want to kill (in da scope) and he is dead.
  • I do both and i dont think theres many forumers that could beat me. Just sayin xD
  • g0nzo wrote: »
    I do both and i dont think theres many forumers that could beat me. Just sayin xD
    I don't think there are many forumers that even know who the #$@*!! you are. Just saying.
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    I don't think there are many forumers that even know who the #$@*!! you are. Just saying.

    That time of the month again eh? I belive im older than you on this forums

    edit. theres no point in arguing with you, and im saying that from experience so im done
  • g0nzo wrote: »
    That time of the month again eh? I belive im older than you on this forums
    I've been here little over 3 years now. I've seen many people come and go, and I can honestly say that I haven't come across your name enough for you to be crowning yourself a legend among us.
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    I've been here little over 3 years now. I've seen many people come and go, and I can honestly say that I haven't come across your name enough for you to be crowning yourself a legend among us.

    Im not a legend neither am i a very well known person. I just started posting recently. And im pretty sure i saw you posting before your first weapon suggestion made in 'pimpmygun'. Correct me if im wrong.
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    I've been here little over 3 years now. I've seen many people come and go, and I can honestly say that I haven't come across your name enough for you to be crowning yourself a legend among us.

    Legends in a free to play game , I couldn't laugh harder.
  • If you want to hear my opinion:
    Im in reallife elite soldier and sniper. I think
    that Quickscope is a stupid invention.
    It became popular in Call of Duty ...
    And then it came to Crossfire. Well, the most teens think its "cool". It is a little bit.
    But its not cool that you get called "dsr noob" or "hs noob" or "omg camper".
    But thats the point. I set already for hours on mud and soil, thats a sniper.
    You´re quietly in SnD until you see someone in your crosshair.
    Of course its now popular to shoot almost without scope / trickshoot. If you like it: Do it.
    But dont call other people who dont want to do the same as you do: Noob,
    thats just noobish if a 16 years old kid call me so :D
  • I_STAR wrote: »
    If you want to hear my opinion:
    Im in reallife elite soldier and sniper. I think
    that Quickscope is a stupid invention.
    It became popular in Call of Duty ...
    And then it came to Crossfire. Well, the most teens think its "cool". It is a little bit.
    But its not cool that you get called "dsr noob" or "hs noob" or "omg camper".
    But thats the point. I set already for hours on mud and soil, thats a sniper.
    You´re quietly in SnD until you see someone in your crosshair.
    Of course its now popular to shoot almost without scope / trickshoot. If you like it: Do it.
    But dont call other people who dont want to do the same as you do: Noob,
    thats just noobish if a 16 years old kid call me so :D
    Exactly! No kid has the right to call himself a real sniper until he has soiled his own pants waiting hours for his mark to show himself. :p
  • I don't qs and i don't hs. I have a own Way to kill people with my fr.
    I scope and than i quckly move to the guy i want to kill (in da scope) and he is dead.

    thats how i do
  • 2ADL wrote: »
    thats how i do

    And thats right how to do it :D
  • I_STAR wrote: »
    If you want to hear my opinion:
    Im in reallife elite soldier and sniper. I think
    that Quickscope is a stupid invention.
    It became popular in Call of Duty ...
    And then it came to Crossfire. Well, the most teens think its "cool". It is a little bit.
    But its not cool that you get called "dsr noob" or "hs noob" or "omg camper".
    But thats the point. I set already for hours on mud and soil, thats a sniper.
    You´re quietly in SnD until you see someone in your crosshair.
    Of course its now popular to shoot almost without scope / trickshoot. If you like it: Do it.
    But dont call other people who dont want to do the same as you do: Noob,
    thats just noobish if a 16 years old kid call me so :D

    so how many people you killed :D

    how was your first kill like
  • 2ADL wrote: »
    so how many people you killed :D

    Im not allowed to tell you sth like that.
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    I've been here little over 3 years now. I've seen many people come and go, and I can honestly say that I haven't come across your name enough for you to be crowning yourself a legend among us.

    Can I be a legend?
    2ADL wrote: »
    which is better and more pro


    when i say regular sniping i mean like flick shot or something

    Depends on the situation. Most of the time quick scoping is more of a defensive mechanism. It is very useful for when you are being pushed and need the mobility. It also avoids the on hit recoil that scopes have while scoped in. Doing everything right and then having your shot missed, because you got hit once can be frustrating at times. Although at longer ranges when I am the one initiating the fight, I tend to use my scope.
  • Hard-scope > Quick-scope
    Talonblaze wrote: »
    One gets you called a camper or 'hard-scoper', despite being the more realistic and traditional way to use a sniper, limiting your field of vision making you have to rely on your other senses and notifiers of enemies.

    Others usually involve a dot on your screen and the skill-less abuse of a 1-hit kill rifle's perfect accuracy for less than a second. The traditional COD killing way of using a sniper. Considered 'pro'.

    You decide.

    ^Pretty much this.

    Hard-scoping takes a bit more skill since you are actually waiting for an enemy to run into your scopes. It is more challenging at certain times but you can monitor hot-zones and get a good amount of kills going. To me, hard-scoping is more realistic and hence forth, more pro.

    Quick-scoping is somewhat challenging but after a while, it's rather easy. Whether you sharpie a dot on your screen or just memorize where the center of your screen is, with just 2 buttons, you get the kill.. Not only is this unrealistic but it's close to impossible to pull off in real life.

    The AWM weighs about 15 lbs. Rather light no doubt but to pull it up, pull the bolt back, look down the scope without adjusting for range, and shoot within 2 seconds might be possible, but rather impossible to actually hit the target due to recoil and no compensation for bullet drop, etc.

    I define Quick-scoping to be more of a bug or glitch than an actual tactic for using a sniper rifle.

    All this being said, I hardscope and quickscope depending on the situations but I prefer hard-scoping.
  • Quick scoping allows you to have more mobility in my opinion. It's great when you need to dispatch enemies in close.
  • vMiamiRain wrote: »
    ^Pretty much this.

    Hard-scoping takes a bit more skill since you are actually waiting for an enemy to run into your scopes. It is more challenging at certain times but you can monitor hot-zones and get a good amount of kills going. To me, hard-scoping is more realistic and hence forth, more pro.

    Quick-scoping is somewhat challenging but after a while, it's rather easy. Whether you sharpie a dot on your screen or just memorize where the center of your screen is, with just 2 buttons, you get the kill.. Not only is this unrealistic but it's close to impossible to pull off in real life.

    The AWM weighs about 15 lbs. Rather light no doubt but to pull it up, pull the bolt back, look down the scope without adjusting for range, and shoot within 2 seconds might be possible, but rather impossible to actually hit the target due to recoil and no compensation for bullet drop, etc.

    I define Quick-scoping to be more of a bug or glitch than an actual tactic for using a sniper rifle.

    All this being said, I hardscope and quickscope depending on the situations but I prefer hard-scoping.

    Pathetic. Go play another game if you want realism.

    PS: You might want to look at a replay. Nothing changes on the model when you scope. There is no pulling the rifle up, pulling the bolt back or adjusting for range.
  • Pathetic. Go play another game if you want realism.
    Give me $1500 and you'll never see me on these forums ever again.

    PS: You might want to look at a replay. Nothing changes on the model when you scope. There is no pulling the rifle up, pulling the bolt back or adjusting for range.
    Which is exactly why it cannot be pulled off in real life, making it unrealistic. You have to do all of that to operate a sniper rifle again IRL. Unlike here where the scope adjustment is just 1 click and done.

    Answers are in blue.
  • Pathetic. Go play another game if you want realism.

    PS: You might want to look at a replay. Nothing changes on the model when you scope. There is no pulling the rifle up, pulling the bolt back or adjusting for range.
    Play nice, Doop. Don't make me take you out of the sandbox on my first day.
  • vMiamiRain wrote: »
    Answers are in blue.
    Give me $1500 and you'll never see me on these forums ever again.

    Which is exactly why it cannot be pulled off in real life, making it unrealistic. You have to do all of that to operate a sniper rifle again IRL. Unlike here where the scope adjustment is just 1 click and done.


    I'm not sure why I would wan't to pay you to leave. Also, amazing shooting feats are done all the time with enough practice/repetition.
    Play nice, Doop. Don't make me take you out of the sandbox on my first day.

    On the job training?
  • Anyways, I've never put a piece of paper inthe middle of my screen, and I can more than likely QS better than tons of people in this game, and I still mix it up. You can't just do 1 or the other and expect it to work ^_^
  • I'm not sure why I would wan't to pay you to leave. Also, amazing shooting feats are done all the time with enough practice/repetition.


    In order for the quick-scope to be successful; everything would have to either be rigged (correct scope adjustment, target positioned in the same exact spot per every attempt, etc.) or the person just gets very lucky. Not to mention, again, bullet drop that can't really be accounted for when you have .3 seconds to look through the scope. Not saying it's impossible but it's highly, highly unlikely even with practice and repetition.

    I understand this is a video game, it's not meant to be realistic but this quick-scoping ordeal is a bit too much.
  • vMiamiRain wrote: »
    In order for the quick-scope to be successful; everything would have to either be rigged (correct scope adjustment, target positioned in the same exact spot per every attempt, etc.) or the person just gets very lucky. Not to mention, again, bullet drop that can't really be accounted for when you have .3 seconds to look through the scope. Not saying it's impossible but it's highly, highly unlikely even with practice and repetition.

    I understand this is a video game, it's not meant to be realistic but this quick-scoping ordeal is a bit too much.

    How would it have to be rigged? Most of the shots in cf are less than 100 meters... You don't need to account for bullet drop at 50 meters