Canada vs United States

1234579

Comments

  • Excludable wrote: »
    In historical, political, and economical effects on the world.

    historically the united states has more interesting history behind it (in my opinion). economically the united states is more powerful and wealthy, while canada has a more neutral standpoint (nothing wrong with that, but they don't have that booming economy that the USA has)

    I live in Canada. Personally I hate North America with a passion.
  • I'm planning on hitching a ride with the aliens to another planet, who's with me?
  • ZX_10R wrote: »
    historically the united states has more interesting history behind it (in my opinion). economically the united states is more powerful and wealthy, while canada has a more neutral standpoint (nothing wrong with that, but they don't have that booming economy that the USA has)

    I live in Canada. Personally I hate North America with a passion.
    I'm in the United States.

    I'm devoted to the NA. I'd love to have a debate with you.
  • lookit clearly its now Aliens VS The United Kingdom.
  • [QUOTE=Excludable;1347257
    Napoleons brother, and general, Leclarc urged Napoleon to send an army to San Domingo or w/e to calm the hype led by the black leader, once that is achieved, they will send an army to New Orleans and set up an empire called "New France" in the west Mississippi.
    [/QUOTE]

    Way to mention another reason why they sold the Louisiana Purchase is because the Invasion into San Domingo failed.
  • From what I have studied, USA has saved the Alliances (France, Canada, Britain) in World War One because they entered the war when Germany sank "Lusitania" holding over 2000 Americans. Then during World War Two all the US did was create the Atomic Bomb and started hating on communison thus having a Cold War with the Russians. Now the USA has got themselves in a hold with who started for oil.

    Canada on the other hand proved that there just as strong as any other nation every though they are very young. Canada prevented a 3rd World War between Egpyt and Israel which Britain was going to step in for Israel and Russia for Egpyt. Canada also broke through Italy during WW2 thus trapping Germany leading to their defeat.

    Canada and USA both did good stuff but I'd say Canada was more on the peaceful side thus making them better in opinion. Even if USA wasn't USA and it was France then Canada would have that alliance with France like they do with USA today.
  • and england. we wuve you mounties. we'd be with canada over america imo.
  • Ehhhh no real arguments for Canada. Nothing significant IMO.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    Ehhhh no real arguments for Canada. Nothing significant IMO.
    We were the first country to get the H1N1 out of our own country.
    We came out of the recession way before USA did.
    Our Health care is better.
    And they have me!
  • Well... the inventor of Basketball was Canadian... if you think thats significant. Because out of all the stuff we thrown into the argument you dont think any of it is significant...
  • Shad0wK1LL wrote: »
    We were the first country to get the H1N1 out of our own country.
    We came out of the recession way before USA did.
    Our Health care is better.
    And they have me!

    thats a down side
  • dual1020 wrote: »
    Well... the inventor of Basketball was Canadian... if you think thats significant. Because out of all the stuff we thrown into the argument you dont think any of it is significant...
    my teacher last year was the great grandson of of the inventor of basketball!

    my teachers name is Michael Naismith
  • Democracy is a ****ty form of government.

    I'll take an ideal communism any day. But humans are too stupid for it.
  • Denxi wrote: »
    Democracy is a ****ty form of government.

    I'll take an ideal communism any day. But humans are too stupid for it.

    denxi is obviously right.
  • Communism is a good idea, like Denxi said, but humans trashed it.

    Honestly, if there was communism placed in the USA, i wouldn't do jack ****.
  • Denxi wrote: »
    Democracy is a ****ty form of government.

    I'll take an ideal communism any day. But humans are too stupid for it.

    thyre not too stupid for it, theyre too greedy by far for it. like i said earlier, communism would work but due to basic human instinct we trash the concept while we try to implement it into society.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    Atomic Bomb
    Treaties
    #1 Country in the World

    Democracy



    It's a clear thesis.

    #1 Country in the World?
    pfft thats only according to what ppl say, the study shows that some place in Eurpoe luxemburg or something has the best living based off statistics.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    Atomic Bomb
    Treaties
    #1 Country in the World

    Democracy



    It's a clear thesis.
    Who cares, you have a big bomb, woohoo.
    Russia has one too.
  • Shad0wK1LL wrote: »
    Who cares, you have a big bomb, woohoo.
    Russia has one too.
    This argument is Canada vs United States.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    This argument is Canada vs United States.
    Im just pointing out that USA isnt the only one
    and who cares if u have an atomic bomb, who are u going to use it on without starting World War III? And this time, USA will be the hated ones, not Germany.
    And you wats gonna happen? Canada, is gonna have to to help you guys, cuz u did a dumbass move.
  • Shad0wK1LL wrote: »
    Im just pointing out that USA isnt the only one
    and who cares if u have an atomic bomb, who are u going to use it on without starting World War III? And this time, USA will be the hated ones, not Germany.
    And you wats gonna happen? Canada, is gonna have to to help you guys, cuz u did a dumbass move.
    Japan started it, so you really can't hate on the USA.
  • If you're talking about USA vs CANADA in meanings of war, USA wins in less than a week.
    Canada's primary strenght in war is support (medical, weaponry, food etc...)

    Story of USA; From what I remember, UK sent some colonists in North-America (now Georgia or Virginia). Colonist wanted their independence and got it when they won the American Revolutionary War. (UK VS USA)

    NOW some colonists wanted to stay faithful to UK, so they migrated up TO Ontario and Quebec. (Quebec FTW)

    That's why Canada is still influenced by the Queen Elizabeth II.

    @Excludable: Am I right?

    Sorry for bad English.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    Japan started it, so you really can't hate on the USA.
    no matter what, if you release that atomic bomb ANYWHERE
    u will start WWIII

    Even if u bomb Iraq or Iran, Russia will hate on you, cuz they get tonnes of their oil from there
  • people say that the atomic bomb was requeried to end the war and somesay it was japans fault but with the A bomb u did not kill the ones that were on war u killed innocent people, the driver of one of the plains killed himself after he saw what he did, all the idiots that aproved the A-bomb launch should had killed themselfs and if there was a hell they would burn there.... now a days the A bombs existing could destroy a small country easily no country should use them what keeps us from using it is the fear of them being used agaisnt us... if the USA used them against iraq, UN would be on their face, u would be kiked of NATO because they have an agreement that says they wont use the A-bomb unless they all agree it should be used, iraq would respond and all their allies to, russia would be on the USA's ass cuz the USA r trying to make an anti Atomic weapons agreement, north korea would use this to get china to help them to attack the USA, USA would be ****ed because they would have no protection or help from NATO, and russia, iraq, probably china and north korea would be destroing u, why do u think bush didnt use them on his time? ye think about it
  • Shad0wK1LL wrote: »
    no matter what, if you release that atomic bomb ANYWHERE
    u will start WWIII

    Even if u bomb Iraq or Iran, Russia will hate on you, cuz they get tonnes of their oil from there
    Who said we would? I don't see how that helps your argument.
    GotYaGood wrote: »
    people say that the atomic bomb was requeried to end the war and somesay it was japans fault but with the A bomb u did not kill the ones that were on war u killed innocent people, the driver of one of the plains killed himself after he saw what he did, all the idiots that aproved the A-bomb launch should had killed themselfs and if there was a hell they would burn there.... now a days the A bombs existing could destroy a small country easily no country should use them what keeps us from using it is the fear of them being used agaisnt us... if the USA used them against iraq, UN would be on their face, u would be kiked of NATO because they have an agreement that says they wont use the A-bomb unless they all agree it should be used, iraq would respond and all their allies to, russia would be on the USA's ass cuz the USA r trying to make an anti Atomic weapons agreement, north korea would use this to get china to help them to attack the USA, USA would be ****ed because they would have no protection or help from NATO, and russia, iraq, probably china and north korea would be destroing u, why do u think bush didnt use them on his time? ye think about it
    Your throwing out nonsense.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    Who said we would? I don't see how that helps your argument.

    Your throwing out nonsense.
    Im jsut saying, u cant use that atmoic bomb with countries hating on you.

    And i was just giving an example.
  • Excludable wrote: »
    1. Atomic Bomb

    It was NECCESSARY.

    Without it dropped, the war would have continued, killed more soldiers and civilian lives.

    Treaties?

    United States played a major role in the World Wars.

    US barely did anything in WW1 they pretty much were just there for a year
  • North Korea, Best Korea, nuff said tyvm /thread
  • Snorkiepoo wrote: »
    US barely did anything in WW1 they pretty much were just there for a year

    False, take a highschool history class.

    WWI was a war of attrition. This means that the entire thing was just who could stall for the longest. Without US influence, we would have lost, as the US was a HUGE resource of people.
  • Denxi wrote: »
    False, take a highschool history class.

    WWI was a war of attrition. This means that the entire thing was just who could stall for the longest. Without US influence, we would have lost, as the US was a HUGE resource of people.


    I can second that...

    My college History teacher said the same damn thing last week.

    U.S didn't participate in the whole process, but they were the key influence to win the war.