NEW IDEAs FOR CROSS FIRE

2

Comments

  • DoTncRy wrote: »
    DUAL M16
    DUAL AK47....
    u need 2 hands to hold 1 ak47..so 4 hands for dual ak....same with dual m16....and NO LAND MINES!! too powerfull....imagine land mines in egypt...

    You don't need two hands to hold an ak :/
  • pRaze wrote: »
    Duel m9's a possibility since it's weak.
    Gold knife? Why not


    those duel m9's wouldnt be bad or OP and the gold knife then you get more gold stuff again. i think there is enough golden things 'm4a1,awm,ak,katana,D.E' dont need to add more gold things.
  • pRaze wrote: »
    You don't need two hands to hold an ak :/
    true but can you aim good when you hold it with one hand? no so they shouldnt need to do it and it would be OP anyway
  • suiles wrote: »
    lol? so your saying its fine to have 30 rifes and just 5-6 snipers?
    if you get like 30 rifes you can have more snipers awell.

    How much variety can there be in snipers?
  • pRaze wrote: »
    You don't need two hands to hold an ak :/

    Id like to think dual wield aks would have a hefty reload time.
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    How much variety can there be in snipers?


    well reskin or light sniper or heavy sniper or silencer.
  • suiles wrote: »
    well reskin or light sniper or heavy sniper or silencer.

    You quoted the wrong post. I accidently double-posted. Anyways, I'm not saying 30 rifles and 10 different m4 reskins is okay, Im just saying, we already have a good amount of snipers. New snipers are unnecessary, as well as m4a1 or awm reskins.
  • Weapons:
    Land mine.
    More land mines!!

    DUAL M9
    DUAL GOLD M9
    DUAL SILVER M9
    DUAL CAMO M9

    MOVING LAND MINE(HORNET)

    M16 GOLD
    M16 SILVER
    DUAL M16
    DUAL AK47

    DUAL NADE
    TRIPPLE NADE

    DUAL KNIFE
    DUAL GOLD KNIFE
    GOLD KNIFE (CHINESE CF I THINK THEY HAVE IT.)
    GOLD TOMPSON(CHINESE CF + VIETNAM CF HAVE IT)

    WA2000

    G3A3
    C7A2
    C8A2




    Clan guns:
    UMP
    BLACK DESERT EAGEL
    P90 WITH A CLAN TAG
    T99




    sorry caps
    lol dual ak47 thatmade me laugh
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    You quoted the wrong post. I accidently double-posted. Anyways, I'm not saying 30 rifles and 10 different m4 reskins is okay, Im just saying, we already have a good amount of snipers. New snipers are unnecessary, as well as m4a1 or awm reskins.
    yes but you wont say 'new rifes are unnecessary' i think the reason why you say it is because you dont like snipers or your bad with it. oh so your saying a rife is allowed to have a silencer and not a sniper?
    because you say they dont got to make snipers anymore if i understand it right
    yeah i know i didnt see you double posted but i fixed it befor you posted again.
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    You quoted the wrong post. I accidently double-posted. Anyways, I'm not saying 30 rifles and 10 different m4 reskins is okay, Im just saying, we already have a good amount of snipers. New snipers are unnecessary, as well as m4a1 or awm reskins.
    We still have the Knight SR-25 and the VSK-94 Digital Camo to look forward to. Not to mention the return of the regular VSK-94. And I wouldn't mind getting a suppressed version of the SR-25 either.
  • GR_Roid wrote: »
    Ooo I really like the clan guns idea.
    how would they even do that.. a gun with the clan tag of the person hes clan.
  • suiles wrote: »
    true but can you aim good when you hold it with one hand? no so they shouldnt need to do it and it would be OP anyway

    In real life, not in game trolol.
  • pRaze wrote: »
    In real life, not in game trolol.
    no in the game you cant aswell because its to heavy to carry both and aim good with it while shooting. you cant do that all in the same time. unless you wanna make it OP and unreal.
  • pRaze wrote: »
    In real life, not in game trolol.
    But how much fun would this game still be if F2P players with Item Shop rifles would be playing against ZP-buyers with dual AKs? The ZP-buyer would have the advantage of having twice the ammo the F2P player has in his magazine. Not only that, he can fire 2 rounds simultaneously. This is okay for a weak gun like the UZI, but AK-47s? Even if they would make it realistic, and take the massive recoil into account that comes with wielding an AK-47 in one hand without the support of the other, than that would still mean you can fire the first 2 rounds without recoil, doing twice the damage you would normally do firing a single AK-47.

    The massive recoil and the reload time would be the only drawback. However, double damage and 60 rounds per reload would break the game.
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    But how much fun would this game still be if F2P players with Item Shop rifles would be playing against ZP-buyers with dual AKs? The ZP-buyer would have the advantage of having twice the ammo the F2P player has in his magazine. Not only that, he can fire 2 rounds simultaneously. This is okay for a weak gun like the UZI, but AK-47s? Even if they would make it realistic, and take the massive recoil into account that comes with wielding an AK-47 in one hand without the support of the other, than that would still mean you can fire the first 2 rounds without recoil, doing twice the damage you would normally do firing a single AK-47.

    The massive recoil and the reload time would be the only drawback. However, double damage and 60 rounds per reload would break the game.

    +1 im totaly with you on that one!
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    But how much fun would this game still be if F2P players with Item Shop rifles would be playing against ZP-buyers with dual AKs? The ZP-buyer would have the advantage of having twice the ammo the F2P player has in his magazine. Not only that, he can fire 2 rounds simultaneously. This is okay for a weak gun like the UZI, but AK-47s? Even if they would make it realistic, and take the massive recoil into account that comes with wielding an AK-47 in one hand without the support of the other, than that would still mean you can fire the first 2 rounds without recoil, doing twice the damage you would normally do firing a single AK-47.

    The massive recoil and the reload time would be the only drawback. However, double damage and 60 rounds per reload would break the game.
    i agree if they bring out the ak duel then maybe they could bring out m12s duel. because i think its all about spray if he wanted 'duel ak' but if they bring out a gun like those then i sell my account and leave crossfire. like how would it be fun to play?
    there is allready enough spraying with the m12s.
  • suiles wrote: »
    yes but you wont say 'new rifes are unnecessary' i think the reason why you say it is because you dont like snipers or your bad with it. oh so your saying a rife is allowed to have a silencer and not a sniper?
    because you say they dont got to make snipers anymore if i understand it right
    yeah i know i didnt see you double posted but i fixed it befor you posted again.

    "Oh, he is against new snipers. HE MUST BE BAD WITH THEM." No. I like sniping and I'm not bad at it. AWM is good enough. No point in having more snipers beyond just looks.
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    "Oh, he is against new snipers. HE MUST BE BAD WITH THEM." No. I like sniping and I'm not bad at it. AWM is good enough. No point in having more snipers beyond just looks.

    lol the awm is a bad sniper.... to easy to snip with (1hit kill) lol.
    so wait you have m4a1 and ak those are good enough rifes so you dont need any other.
  • suiles wrote: »
    lol the awm is a bad sniper.... to easy to snip with (1hit kill) lol.
    so wait you have m4a1 and ak those are good enough rifes so you dont need any other.

    Pretty sure I said sniper. Maybe you wanna go re-read my post. And Awm is bad because its too good? Yeah that makes perfect sense. M4 and AK ARE good enough. You dont NEED any others. (For assaults)
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    Pretty sure I said sniper. Maybe you wanna go re-read my post. And Awm is bad because its too good? Yeah that makes perfect sense. M4 and AK ARE good enough. You dont NEED any others. (For assaults)
    awm is a one hit kill so its each to kill them you still got a big chance to kill them of closs up while you shouldnt a sniper is for long range not *******
    also why do you hate it? the way you say it you just need 3 guns in the game.....
    m4,ak,awm.
  • suiles wrote: »
    awm is a one hit kill so its each to kill them you still got a big chance to kill them of closs up while you shouldnt a sniper is for long range not *******
    also why do you hate it? the way you say it you just need 3 guns in the game.....
    m4,ak,awm.

    Again, read what I posted. But anyway, why do we need Uzi? Why do we need type89? Why do we need all these useless guns when we have weapons like m4a1 that are clearly better?
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    Again, read what I posted. But anyway, why do we need Uzi? Why do we need type89? Why do we need all these useless guns when we have weapons like m4a1 that are clearly better?
    because some people are good with it or wanna change of gun sometimes?
    yes i know your post was about snipers but i said about both rife and sniper get it......
  • xSkyyy wrote: »
    is he trolling or is he for real?

    ^

    Exactly what I thought after the first 3 lines, talking about land mines.

    And moving landmines? That's just. No comment.
  • M9 is the worst gun in all game. you neeed 1 full clip in head to kill someone.

    knife and m16 variation? Its like a nice idea, .. but really:

    Dual m16/Dual Ak47 ... Not even in the battlefield, WW2, no one could hold 2 M16A1, or Ak47. A gun weight around 20Kg..... and recoil? And how do you realod them... just... JUST NO.
  • I disagree with the landmines and most of your suggestions.

    You know that if they ever made the C7A2 into this game, it would be basically a M16A1 with a scope, and the C8A2/A3 would be a scoped M4/M4A1
  • Nightlie wrote: »
    "Oh, he is against new snipers. HE MUST BE BAD WITH THEM." No. I like sniping and I'm not bad at it. AWM is good enough. No point in having more snipers beyond just looks.
    The Scar Light and the M12s are good enough as well. So there is no point in having any other ARs or SMGs either.

    Do you even hear how dumb you just sounded? There is every point in getting new snipers. Especially since there are noobs like you that think that that noobcannon a.k.a. the AWM is the ultimate sniper rifle. The AWM is a F'ing joke! People think they are good snipers because they can quickscope with a AWM, while in fact THEY AREN'T EVEN SNIPING. They are blasting a 1-hit cannon at their opponent's general direction, using quickscope to bypass the inaccuracy of a scoped out sniper rifle. But give these noobs a 2-hit sniper, and 9 out of 10 will suck ass at sniping.

    Sniping isn't about doing 100 damage, grazing your opponents arm, noob. Sniping is about aiming for the head, and with emphasis on AIMING. That is why most quickscopers suck ass at sniping. Because they can't aim. They rely on the power of the AWM to get them their kills

    So yes, I agree with Suiles that you suck ass at sniping, simply because you praise that over-glorified noob cannon, and don't care for more challenging sniper rifles.
  • Frecklez wrote: »
    The Scar Light and the M12s are good enough as well. So there is no point in having any other ARs or SMGs either.

    Do you even hear how dumb you just sounded? There is every point in getting new snipers. Especially since there are noobs like you that think that that noobcannon a.k.a. the AWM is the ultimate sniper rifle. The AWM is a F'ing joke! People think they are good snipers because they can quickscope with a AWM, while in fact THEY AREN'T EVEN SNIPING. They are blasting a 1-hit cannon at their opponent's general direction, using quickscope to bypass the inaccuracy of a scoped out sniper rifle. But give these noobs a 2-hit sniper, and 9 out of 10 will suck ass at sniping.

    Sniping isn't about doing 100 damage, grazing your opponents arm, noob. Sniping is about aiming for the head, and with emphasis on AIMING. That is why most quickscopers suck ass at sniping. Because they can't aim. They rely on the power of the AWM to get them their kills

    So yes, I agree with Suiles that you suck ass at sniping, simply because you praise that over-glorified noob cannon, and don't care for more challenging sniper rifles.
    ty and its so true. so many people say 'im a pro sniper' when they use a awm,dsr,... '
    (1hit kill) well give them a sniper that dont have a 1-hit kill and they gonna be so bad because they just gonna get the 80 damage of that one shot.