Ron Paul
Comments
-
RawrJafrikan wrote: »Because being gay is not a first world problem. Because the gay community does completely legitimate protests such as an attempt to march on Disneyland.
Hi, I'm going to include every gay person who's ever been persecuted into the small group of idiots who do stupid ****. -
Hi, I'm going to include every gay person who's ever been persecuted into the small group of idiots who do stupid ****.
Hi, I'm going to say that it isn't legitimate to use a planned event which was able to bring about 100,000 people in one sitting, and claim that it wasn't a proper representation of the whole community, even though they have had other rather ridiculous methods of protest.
Translation:
Herp derp derp derp herp derp herp derp derp herp. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »Hi, I'm going to say that it isn't legitimate to use a planned event which was able to bring about 100,000 people in one sitting, and claim that it wasn't a proper representation of the whole community, even though they have had other rather ridiculous methods of protest.
Translation:
Herp derp derp derp herp derp herp derp derp herp.
Oic, I misinterpreted your post, my bad. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »You are seriously lost.
Learn genetics before claiming that homosexuality is something that is uncontrollable.
Regardless, Ron Paul advocates that the STATE decide whether or not that is an issue. So a gay population could none the less move to a state with other gays and then make laws using the true democratic system as opposed to forcing others into their view. IT works both ways.
I am not saying it is uncontrolable, I am just saying that they are borned inclined towards homosexualty. obviously they can do some thing about what they are born as, but it is hard of cause.
homesexuals tends to have similar cases in their ancestors and relatives which they never knew.( so there, it is passed on through genes/ inherited)
By the way I am not amercian so I don't care about Ron paul.( I just came from new zealand to play ghost mode and hang around in the forum) -
He has some nice ideas and I like his foreign policy..but I just don't think he will win. Although I really wish he would.
All of the current runners have faults, I think Dr. Paul is one of the best ones though. It's a shame the media is ignoring him like idiots. -
Abortion, under Economist Steven Levitt, decreased crime in the United States dramatically.
I also would like to add that it's the woman's choice for abortion. It's her body.
What defines a person?
Actual "life?" Or a conscious state with sentimental feelings.
We eat eggs, why do we as creatures have a right to eat one's "could've been" chicken?
dem 2 cents dawg -
What defines a person?
Actual "life?" Or a conscious state with sentimental feelings.
We eat eggs, why do we as creatures have a right to eat one's "could've been" chicken?
dem 2 cents dawg
Dumbest argument for abortion ever.
A chicken egg, believe it or not, will NOT become a person. It will become a chicken. Which we already eat.
I know, right? -
I don't think you see the point.Dumbest argument for abortion ever.
A chicken egg, believe it or not, will NOT become a person. It will become a chicken. Which we already eat.
I know, right?
Define person.
Since many pro-abortion argue that the fetus is still a person because it has potential, wouldn't that mean an egg has potential?
Instead of being rash, consider this.
An egg has potential, correct?
A fetus has potential, correct? -
-
I don't think you see the point.
Define person.
Since many pro-abortion argue that the fetus is still a person because it has potential, wouldn't that mean an egg has potential?
Instead of being rash, consider this.
An egg has potential, correct?
A fetus has potential, correct?
Potential to be a chicken. Which we will still eat.
Your comparison doesn't work, and I can't believe I have to spell it out like this, because:
Egg: Eat -> Chicken: Eat
Fetus: Kill -> Person: Do not kill
I'm all for abortion, it makes sense, but your argument doesn't. -
People do kill people and it is considered wrong.Potential to be a chicken. Which we will still eat.
Your comparison doesn't work, and I can't believe I have to spell it out like this, because:
Egg: Eat -> Chicken: Eat
Fetus: Kill -> Person: Do not kill
I'm all for abortion, it makes sense, but your argument doesn't.
In your statement, wouldn't that also mean that eating an egg would be wrong?
Think. -
People do kill people and it is considered wrong.
In your statement, wouldn't that also mean that eating an egg would be wrong?
Think.
Alright, one more try.
THIS IS THE REALITY
Egg: Eat (RIGHT) -> Chicken: Eat (RIGHT)
Fetus: Kill (RIGHT) -> Person: Do not kill (RIGHT)
YOU ARGUMENT IS SAYING:We eat eggs, why do we as creatures have a right to eat one's "could've been" chicken?
"If it is considered RIGHT to kill chicken eggs, then why should it be considered WRONG to kill fetuses???"
BUT THE EGGS, WHICH WE KILL (RIGHT), WOULD GROW UP TO BE CHICKENS, WHICH WE WOULD STILL KILL (RIGHT).
FETUSES HOWEVER, GROW UP TO BE HUMANS, SOMETHING THAT KILLING IS CONSIDERED WRONG
CHICKENS = IT'S RIGHT TO KILL, HUMANS IT'S WRONG.
CHICKEN = RIGHT
HUMAN = WRONG -
No, you're avoiding my point.1. Replace right with ok. I can't tell if you're just stupid or trying to save face.
2. Don't be a politician.
You're being a speciest, since clearly you stated killing a chicken is okay. Why is killing a chicken okay? Would killing a dog be okay? No, to most Americans, killing a dog would be impractical.
Apply that to a chicken. -
No, you're avoiding my point.
You're being a speciest, since clearly you stated killing a chicken is okay. Why is killing a chicken okay? Would killing a dog be okay? No, to most Americans, killing a dog would be impractical.
Apply that to a chicken.
Find me a culture where it is ok to kill chicken eggs, but it is not ok to kill the chicken.
What's that? No where? There goes your scapegoat. Humanity is fine with killing chickens. I don't have to argue whether or not killing a chicken in ok, killing a chicken IS ok. If killing a chicken wasn't ok, then killing the EGGS wouldn't be ok, making your argument invalid.
Your entire arguments rests on killing the chicken being ok, AND it being not ok. That's how you know you're talking to an idiot, when both parts of their argument rely on the other being false. -
-
How about we forget what defines life and focus on helping the women who need it. There are non-profit organizations like Caris that can provide support (financial, mental, physical, etc) to the women who are considering abortion.
Let's face it, when a girl realizes she's pregnant, she's not thinking about how abortion would be killing a cell in her body (though if she's had enough abortions to think that then she should just become sterile), she's thinking how she's going to provide for this baby or how it's going to crush her plans for the future. If we can make the pregnancy work, then abortion isn't needed. -
Making the pregnancy work isn't especially hard, just a pretty small loss of money when the person can't work/whatever.
Being forced to carry to term because some christian fundamentalists gets involved and says "hey, you don't have to kill this baby, we can pay" is disgusting and sad though.
Pretty much removes the choice out of the equation.
The options become "Carry this baby to term because I have no excuses, these people promised me everything".
Right, thats just one option.
![[Denxi]](https://forum.z8games.com/uploads/customavatars/0/navatar_2018000.gif){kind=avatar}
![[dot]](https://forum.z8games.com/uploads/customavatars/27/navatar_2942827.gif){kind=avatar}
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 954 CrossFire Announcements
- 945 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 601 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 704 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic