Discussion: ESG
Comments
-
mateuszsweg wrote: »Yes, because I refuse to read someone's post, that justifies someone's age. Your logic is the age of a 14 year old.
No because of your immature and absolutely absurd replies, and in protest of my statement, you just repeated the same ad hominem I used on you. I mean come on... I thought you were mouthy enough to insult me more intelligibly than that. -
mateuszsweg wrote: »Why voice his opinion about a league trying to make it better, when he's not even going to make it out of groups with the team he's playing with? xD?
Maybe he cares about the game? What's wrong with that? I mean it's obvious Stockholm Syndrome, but if he likes something and wants to better it regardless of his own personal profit who are you to deny him for trying? Again. You're 14. -
Maybe he cares about the game? What's wrong with that? I mean it's obvious Stockholm Syndrome, but if he likes something and wants to better it regardless of his own personal profit who are you to deny him for trying? Again. You're 14.
Why care about a game he's never going to succeed in? xD? -
mateuszsweg wrote: »Why voice his opinion about a league trying to make it better, when he's not even going to make it out of groups with the team he's playing with? xD?
You talk so much about this when prime always barely got by. 2-1 VIOAES, 2-1 FSX, 10-8 undaunted. Same thing in the winter series. -
You talk so much about this when prime always barely got by. 2-1 VIOAES, 2-1 FSX, 10-8 undaunted. Same thing in the winter series.
We got more rounds on Fly Society in the half of a scrim before their match than Prime overall. I'm not one to really talk ****, but I mean come on... You guys are the fnatic of CF (Except ****ty).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjLHduTNxlQ -
You talk so much about this when prime always barely got by. 2-1 VIOAES, 2-1 FSX, 10-8 undaunted. Same thing in the winter series.
You would have been one of those teams we would have "barely" got past if we saw you. And I forgot, barely winning a match is hardly a win at all to people like you. Wins a win chump. -
We got more rounds on Fly Society in the half of a scrim before their match than Prime overall. I'm not one to really talk ****, but I mean come on... You guys are the fnatic of CF (Except ****ty).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjLHduTNxlQ
Oh man, scrim scores mean everything! We beat fly society in a scrim once, I guess that means we're better. The match didn't matter. -
mateuszsweg wrote: »You would have been one of those teams we would have "barely" got past if we saw you. And I forgot, barely winning a match is hardly a win at all to people like you. Wins a win chump.
Yeah you beat Undaunted when Thornz threw the game. I wasn't even playing, but keep talking ****, it fits your age. -
Yeah you beat Undaunted when Thornz threw the game. I wasn't even playing, but keep talking ****, it fits your age.
Oh baby I love dem excuses. Yeah, we beat undaunted when 3 of us had a bad game but then picked it up, one of us going 9-0 2nd half (holla at cha boi). -
mateuszsweg wrote: »Make excuses for a team that you're currently in while you watched from the sidelines. Don't worry, the outcome would have been no different if you were playing.
Idk you won 10-8. Thornz threw the entire match, and Silver's a Sub for Undaunted...
Really you played 5v3+1sub+1thrower.
Not to mention you hide behind it at every chance you get. -
Idk you won 10-8. Thornz threw the entire match, and Silver's a Sub for Undaunted...
Really you played 5v3+1sub+1thrower.
Not to mention you hide behind it at every chance you get.
Why are you making excuses for them, esp when this match happened ages ago? I could easily play the same game you are and put the blame on drel and tommy for going negative that match as to why it was so close.
And honestly, do you think you would have changed it at all? You're some random from counter-strike or some ****. You probably would have done worse than thornz's girlfriend. There's a reason why you're playing with Undaunted, but I guess you could call it a "start" to your CF career. That's if you stay long enough to say you have one before you realize that you'll get no where in this game and leave. -
mateuszsweg wrote: »Why are you making excuses for them, esp when this match happened ages ago? I could easily play the same game you are and put the blame on drel and tommy for going negative that match as to why it was so close.
And honestly, do you think you would have changed it at all? You're some random from counter-strike or some ****. You probably would have done worse than thornz's girlfriend.
Then why don't we schedule a bo3, we agree on uploading our screenshots when we're asked, and we setup a date everyone can make?
Oh and I'm just here for 2014. I have a back injury so I can't join the military quite yet. As soon as that's over I'm gone. -
Then why don't we schedule a bo3, we agree on uploading our screenshots when we're asked, and we setup a date everyone can make?
Oh and I'm just here for 2014. I have a back injury so I can't join the military quite yet. As soon as that's over I'm gone.
I've tried doing this before with people I have disagreements with on the forums before, mykl calls me an idiot for "wasting time arguing with bads on the forums rather than pubbing". You can xfire (michael195) if you want to schedule something. -
mateuszsweg wrote: »Why are you making excuses for them, esp when this match happened ages ago? I could easily play the same game you are and put the blame on drel and tommy for going negative that match as to why it was so close.
And honestly, do you think you would have changed it at all? You're some random from counter-strike or some ****. You probably would have done worse than thornz's girlfriend. There's a reason why you're playing with Undaunted, but I guess you could call it a "start" to your CF career. That's if you stay long enough to say you have one before you realize that you'll get no where in this game and leave.
but i am on roster now mayne -
mateuszsweg wrote: »I've tried doing this before with people I have disagreements with on the forums before, mykl calls me an idiot for "wasting time arguing with bads on the forums rather than pubbing". You can xfire (michael195) if you want to schedule something.
Well I don't have xfire, but hopefully Zz or x0tek reads this and they'll add you and set it up. -
Laughing my ****ing ass off.Yeah you beat Undaunted when Thornz threw the game. I wasn't even playing, but keep talking ****, it fits your age.Idk you won 10-8. Thornz threw the entire match, and Silver's a Sub for Undaunted...
Really you played 5v3+1sub+1thrower.
Not to mention you hide behind it at every chance you get.
Umm.... I really don't appreciate you saying I "Threw" the match when I had one bad half in that match... Making it seem like I threw it on purpose kind of ****es me off, when I for a fact didn't. If you're gonna say something, have the story correct. Or else keep your mouth shut.
I could say the same thing about Reid and the match vs LPK, considering we ran basically the same strat everyround, and he alone costed over 3 rounds by being caught alone, along with bad decision calls for the team to react to things. So I could say that we lost to LPK because we played 5v3+1sub+1thrower. But unlike you I don't go around saying that. We played our hearts out and thats all that matters.
So next time Jordan, have your facts straight before you bring up false information. Or better yet, just don't talk about things that didn't concern you. -
black0uttttt wrote: »I do not support what ESG has been doing, the favoritism has been around since WOGL with LifeLine, it's just the way she goes..
I do think Trio lost fair and square and should stop being whiny biitches
You know nothing, we aren't being "whiny biitches". As logic said we know we shouldn't be there but we also know that ace gaming shouldn't of been in finals either. They broke the rules twice and have yet to be punished. And if you haven't heard yet we were just DQ'd for being "immature, and disrespectful" when we weren't the team talking shiit in lobby, in game, and on the forums, we were not the team teabagging or spraying bullets into the other teams bodies when they were dead. And once again let me state that we Trio don't believe we should be in finals, but what we do believe is that ace gaming shouldn't.
I just want to say something to Ace Gaming. Who the fawk are you to say we are a representing Trio's name in a bad way. -
Umm.... I really don't appreciate you saying I "Threw" the match when I had one bad half in that match... Making it seem like I threw it on purpose kind of ****es me off, when I for a fact didn't. If you're gonna say something, have the story correct. Or else keep your mouth shut.
I could say the same thing about Reid and the match vs LPK, considering we ran basically the same strat everyround, and he alone costed over 3 rounds by being caught alone, along with bad decision calls for the team to react to things. So I could say that we lost to LPK because we played 5v3+1sub+1thrower. But unlike you I don't go around saying that. We played our hearts out and thats all that matters.
So next time Jordan, have your facts straight before you bring up false information. Or better yet, just don't talk about things that didn't concern you.
You can come sub for my team and watch us r4pe undaunted again if we see them in a match if that would make you feel better.
In all seriousness, one person doing bad can not be put at fault for losing a match. That is just ignorant when people say that. And i'm pretty sure thornz didn't do the worst during that match.
@erick i'll destroy you at cs:go dweeb -
mateuszsweg wrote: »You can come sub for my team and watch us r4pe undaunted again if we see them in a match if that would make you feel better.
In all seriousness, one person doing bad can not be put at fault for losing a match. That is just ignorant when people say that. And i'm pretty sure thornz didn't do the worst during that match.
@erick i'll destroy you at cs:go dweeb
That wouldn't make me feel better. They don't deserve to r4ped. Thats kinda extreme. + I'm not into that kinky stuff. -
I love how people keep thinking the whole armor situation in their last game is a big deal.
10-6 is the score not adjusted from that map where Roth wore armor for 2 rounds. One of the rounds they lost, one of the rounds they won. So, let's say we do what the community "called for" in giving the other team the rounds he wore armor. That would be.... one round? Considering they lost one of those rounds already.
Adjusted score would be 9-7 (with the round given to the other team) as everyone kept complaining about for us to do. Still looks like Ace Gaming would have won the map regardless. In no way ever did we list anywhere that an illegal item/weapon was a total DQ. It was a rounds adjustment. So now that we've discussed the result with the actions the community wanted it, it's still favoritism though right? Since Ace Gaming still won?
The shadows they had on? We allowed shadows in ESG Spring. I believe there's a screen shot somewhere of us saying in a support ticket that shadows were allowed, it hasn't changed or we would have said something. So, still favoritism there I suppose........
The Trio vs Ace Gaming match? Even logic reported a screen shot of their 4 players (from Ace Gaming) being readied up to play at 9:17 PM. Purvis was in the room the entire time and has stated numerous times there were 4 players in the room before 9:15 PM. One of the players had to relog in order to get on the ESG AC. We decided it would be better to allow a MOMENT of time to let the player get back in game and see these two teams play out a semi-finals match fairly, rather than one team trying to slide their way into the finals on a technicality. Our job is to field the best teams forward, so we made a judgment call to allow both teams to play it out. It's not like Ace Gaming just didn't show up. They were there to play and Trio knew it. If that's what you call favoritism, fine. We're guilty. Happy? -
It would be 8-8. According to your rules that is.[MOD]Polleus wrote: »I love how people keep thinking the whole armor situation in their last game is a big deal.
10-6 is the score not adjusted from that map where Roth wore armor for 2 rounds. One of the rounds they lost, one of the rounds they won. So, let's say we do what the community "called for" in giving the other team the rounds he wore armor. That would be.... one round? Considering they lost one of those rounds already.
Adjusted score would be 9-7 (with the round given to the other team) as everyone kept complaining about for us to do. Still looks like Ace Gaming would have won the map regardless. In no way ever did we list anywhere that an illegal item/weapon was a total DQ. It was a rounds adjustment. So now that we've discussed the result with the actions the community wanted it, it's still favoritism though right? Since Ace Gaming still won?
The shadows they had on? We allowed shadows in ESG Spring. I believe there's a screen shot somewhere of us saying in a support ticket that shadows were allowed, it hasn't changed or we would have said something. So, still favoritism there I suppose........
The Trio vs Ace Gaming match? Even logic reported a screen shot of their 4 players (from Ace Gaming) being readied up to play at 9:17 PM. Purvis was in the room the entire time and has stated numerous times there were 4 players in the room before 9:15 PM. One of the players had to relog in order to get on the ESG AC. We decided it would be better to allow a MOMENT of time to let the player get back in game and see these two teams play out a semi-finals match fairly, rather than one team trying to slide their way into the finals on a technicality. Our job is to field the best teams forward, so we made a judgment call to allow both teams to play it out. It's not like Ace Gaming just didn't show up. They were there to play and Trio knew it. If that's what you call favoritism, fine. We're guilty. Happy?
"- NO VARIANTS ALLOWED
- NO VIP WEAPONS CAN BE EQUIPPED OR IN YOUR EXTRA BAGS
- FOR EVERY ROUND YOU HAVE AN ILLEGAL WEAPON/ITEM, ONE ROUND WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM YOUR FINAL SCORE"
http://esportsgenesis.com/forums/showthread.php?1459-Weapon-Item-Availability
So in a support ticket you allow something, but in an official statement you don't allow something.
"Non-standard game settings or third party applications that provide an advantage over other players as well as adversely affects game play are NOT permitted."
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?t=265113
"Modified In-Game Textures - This includes any modification to weapons, in-game HUD, character models, environment textures"
I) Players and teams are required to read and understand the rules set forth below. Ignorance will not be an excuse when the time comes to enforce rules for a given situation.
players and teams, but not admins. right?
oh yea, black hawks suck -
[MOD]Polleus wrote: »The Trio vs Ace Gaming match? Even logic reported a screen shot of their 4 players (from Ace Gaming) being readied up to play at 9:17 PM. Purvis was in the room the entire time and has stated numerous times there were 4 players in the room before 9:15 PM. One of the players had to relog in order to get on the ESG AC. We decided it would be better to allow a MOMENT of time to let the player get back in game and see these two teams play out a semi-finals match fairly, rather than one team trying to slide their way into the finals on a technicality. Our job is to field the best teams forward, so we made a judgment call to allow both teams to play it out. It's not like Ace Gaming just didn't show up. They were there to play and Trio knew it. If that's what you call favoritism, fine. We're guilty. Happy?
0/5 players on my team saw REQ (their 4th player) enter the room at all before 9:15, its really just purvis that said that, i guess its his word against ours. Except we had a screenshot to prove it. There 4th player wasnt in the room til after 9:15. You were misinformed on that aspect, and there shouldn't have been a 50 minute delay for our match. I can't say we beat ACE so putting us in the finals wouldn't have been a good solution. But there should have been some penalty for them showing up late to a match. Not only that but we only argued our dispute, we did not talk any trash to ACE gaming while they disrespected and attacked us throughout the entire match and right here on the forums. Yet we get DQ'd for disrespect? C'mon now. I think we have the right to be a little upset with the way things happened.
We don't sit there and wait for the 15minute mark every match, especially if we would have seen 4. I know if i saw a 4th player get in the room and leave to relog i would have told my team the dispute is unnecessary. Its over with now anyways, we will continue to be participating in future tournaments. -
kingdooper wrote: »It would be 8-8. According to your rules that is.
"- NO VARIANTS ALLOWED
- NO VIP WEAPONS CAN BE EQUIPPED OR IN YOUR EXTRA BAGS
- FOR EVERY ROUND YOU HAVE AN ILLEGAL WEAPON/ITEM, ONE ROUND WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM YOUR FINAL SCORE"
http://esportsgenesis.com/forums/showthread.php?1459-Weapon-Item-Availability
So in a support ticket you allow something, but in an official statement you don't allow something.
"Non-standard game settings or third party applications that provide an advantage over other players as well as adversely affects game play are NOT permitted."
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?t=265113
"Modified In-Game Textures - This includes any modification to weapons, in-game HUD, character models, environment textures"
Easiest solution would just be to fix the rules then, and add in a bolded 'SHADOWS ARE ALLOWED' thing.
Can't even claim favouritism there, it's just a flaw in the rules that should be corrected, as they had already told a previous team shadows were allowed.
![[MOD]Polleus](https://forum.z8games.com/uploads/customavatars/7/navatar_8918107.gif){kind=avatar}
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 711 CrossFire Announcements
- 712 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 320 Community
- 12 Modes
- 393 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 73 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 524 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 37 CrossFire Off Topic