bandicam

Is it possible for someone to have bandicam running capturing crossfire.exe but not capture if someone is using cheats? I strongly suspect this is possible. I tried to google search this and I found that it's supposedly possible with some cheats in other games, but I never really thought about people bypassing bandi for CF. But I looked at a couple of bandis on youtube (not gonna call anyone out) and I think they were able to bypass bandi and record CF without their cheats showing up. I mean, seriously, I bet the dude was seeing boxes or colored bodies or whatever on his screen but we don't see that on the youtube video.

If so, then what is the meaning of recording with bandi anymore?

The only possible solution I can see to this is to make people capture their full screen instead of just crossfire.exe. Discuss away.

Comments

  • aimbot could pass, seen few aimbotters that don't spin
  • SmasherX wrote: »
    aimbot could pass, seen few aimbotters that don't spin

    Yeah, same. (Tastylimes M700 is legendary lol). But covered up wallhacks would be pretty crazy.
  • 1nsomniac wrote: »
    Yeah, same. (Tastylimes M700 is legendary lol). But covered up wallhacks would be pretty crazy.

    his aimbot did 360's
  • I think it takes time cause u have to edit your video in order to hide walls and aimbots . so in tourneys if they asked for bandicam u have to post it in 25 mins or sth I guess like LPK Cup if you cant upload it fast teamview is the only option lol so you cant edit your video.
  • SmasherX wrote: »
    his aimbot did 360's

    Yeah, but he's still legendary lol
  • no, you guys dont get it. What i mean is, with wallhacks, the hack is one layer, and cf is a layer underneath it. Or something like that. You don't have to edit it out because bandicam doesnt capture the layer with the chams in the first place. It only captures crossfire.exe. For example, when I run bandicam. And change the brightness on my screen. The little sunny symbol shows up even while I'm in cf, but the symbol doesnt show up on Bandicam. The wallhacks are like the brightness symbol; they can go by undetected by a screen recorder that is targeted to capture just crossfire.exe. At least, that's what I think.

    just wondering if anyone can confirm this suspicion. I mean srsly, i strongly believe that there are ppl in this community right now who use this type of premium cheat that is undetectable by screen recorder, and get away with it because they say, "oh here's my bandi, you can see im not looking at ppl thru the walls"
  • PTSLAPPER wrote: »
    no, you guys dont get it. What i mean is, with wallhacks, the hack is one layer, and cf is a layer underneath it. Or something like that. You don't have to edit it out because bandicam doesnt capture the layer with the chams in the first place. It only captures crossfire.exe. For example, when I run bandicam. And change the brightness on my screen. The little sunny symbol shows up even while I'm in cf, but the symbol doesnt show up on Bandicam. The wallhacks are like the brightness symbol; they can go by undetected by a screen recorder that is targeted to capture just crossfire.exe. At least, that's what I think.

    just wondering if anyone can confirm this suspicion. I mean srsly, i strongly believe that there are ppl in this community right now who use this type of premium cheat that is undetectable by screen recorder, and get away with it because they say, "oh here's my bandi, you can see im not looking at ppl thru the walls"

    I'd like to know too.
  • I get what your saying PTSLAPPER, but I really doubt it is possible. I don't know much about cheats but the wallhack uses an injector to alter the game code no? So technically that would mean it is affecting CF it is not just a program ontop of it. So screen recorders should be able to capture wallhacks.

    Now no recoil and what not people would actually have to look at and watch the spread on the video. I've seen a couple of people get busted for that tho, and it is pretty easy to tell in game when you feel like your getting 1 shot across the map non stop.
  • PTSLAPPER wrote: »
    Is it possible for someone to have bandicam running capturing crossfire.exe but not capture if someone is using cheats? I strongly suspect this is possible. I tried to google search this and I found that it's supposedly possible with some cheats in other games, but I never really thought about people bypassing bandi for CF. But I looked at a couple of bandis on youtube (not gonna call anyone out) and I think they were able to bypass bandi and record CF without their cheats showing up. I mean, seriously, I bet the dude was seeing boxes or colored bodies or whatever on his screen but we don't see that on the youtube video.

    If so, then what is the meaning of recording with bandi anymore?

    The only possible solution I can see to this is to make people capture their full screen instead of just crossfire.exe. Discuss away.

    Do you know who razzlez his?You seen his sniper montage, UNBELIEVABLE! Has to be something like this , great idea!
  • headbolt wrote: »
    do you know who razzlez his?you seen his sniper montage, unbelievable! Has to be something like this , great idea!

    looooooool
  • Sort of skimmed through what you're saying, but every wall hack I've used is shown on bandicam.

    If there were cheats that bypassed bandi, it'd be pretty frustrating.
  • PTSLAPPER wrote: »
    no, you guys dont get it. What i mean is, with wallhacks, the hack is one layer, and cf is a layer underneath it. Or something like that. You don't have to edit it out because bandicam doesnt capture the layer with the chams in the first place. It only captures crossfire.exe. For example, when I run bandicam. And change the brightness on my screen. The little sunny symbol shows up even while I'm in cf, but the symbol doesnt show up on Bandicam. The wallhacks are like the brightness symbol; they can go by undetected by a screen recorder that is targeted to capture just crossfire.exe. At least, that's what I think.

    just wondering if anyone can confirm this suspicion. I mean srsly, i strongly believe that there are ppl in this community right now who use this type of premium cheat that is undetectable by screen recorder, and get away with it because they say, "oh here's my bandi, you can see im not looking at ppl thru the walls"

    Ask snitcheloff, he'd know. He's legit.

    EDIT: Oh look, he already posted.
  • Ask snitcheloff, he'd know. He's legit.

    I already answered

    slowwwwwwwwwwwww

    btw, thanks for acknowledging that I'm legit.
  • MiKEYYYYz wrote: »
    I already answered

    slowwwwwwwwwwwww

    btw, thanks for acknowledging that I'm legit.


    You're not legit. You're a known cheater, and yet you still talk like you're good. When in actuality you're not. And you've proven it at WOGL, and CSN. Can't play on client. I WONDER WHY?!?!?!

    P.S. Go ahead call me bad, dumb, stupid, iq of a brick, pubstar or whatever else you're gonna come up with. idgafffffffffffffffff.
  • P.S. Go ahead call me bad, dumb, stupid, iq of a brick, pubstar. idgafffffffffffffffff.


    Ok, you are very stupid.
    You're not legit. You're a known cheater, and yet you still talk like you're good. When in actuality you're not. And you've proven it at WOGL, and CSN. Can't play on client. I WONDER WHY?!?!?!
    I've never choked on a client. I'm a "known cheater" from cheating a year ago, now people just mad because they suck.

    WOGL- 18 frags on cheaters
    CSN- Like 3-4 20's or close to it on winout, 14-2 vs nds, sht on standout (too lazy to check my score)
    WCG- Got stomped by HT but I did decent and got the opening pick on tyler almost every round, sht on exempt.

    other random cups on bandi: 20's

    I don't know why you try talking crap when you're clueless and ignorant, but ok.

    Eh659.png
  • MiKEYYYYz wrote: »
    Ok, you are very stupid.

    I've never choked on a client. I'm a "known cheater" from cheating a year ago, now people just mad because they suck.

    WOGL- 18 frags on cheaters
    CSN- Like 3-4 20's or close to it on winout, 14-2 vs nds, sht on standout (too lazy to check my score)
    WCG- Got stomped by HT but I did decent and got the opening pick on tyler almost every round, sht on exempt.

    other random cups on bandi: 20's

    I don't know why you try talking crap when you're clueless and ignorant, but ok.

    Eh659.png

    Point proven. Thanks!
  • Point proven. Thanks!

    Point proven, you're an idiot.

    bye, have fun in destructive
  • qygxo4.jpg

    I think they were able to bypass bandi and record CF without their cheats showing up. I mean, seriously, I bet the dude was seeing boxes or colored bodies or whatever on his screen but we don't see that on the youtube video.

    Think the guy was just ...good..?
  • Whoa, there. Calm down, Host and Snitch :P Go smoke a bowl together and become best buddies :D

    Anyway, no one is going to either post a bandicam of themselves cheating where it does show up or a bandicam of themselves cheating where it doesn't show up to help prove the point to us either way, unfortunately. I did find just a couple of google links on forums for other games (e.g. MW3, Sudden Attack) where people claim that kind of cheat exists. Not sure what differentiates those games from CF, but I certainly hope we can still rely on bandi...
  • You're not legit. You're a known cheater, and yet you still talk like you're good. When in actuality you're not. And you've proven it at WOGL, and CSN. Can't play on client. I WONDER WHY?!?!?!

    P.S. Go ahead call me bad, dumb, stupid, iq of a brick, pubstar or whatever else you're gonna come up with. idgafffffffffffffffff.

    Snitchez is legit. He used to be a known cheater, and he is good. He played well on various clients.
  • Garret mentioned something about seeing shoe laces through walls?
  • Theoretically it is possibly to create a cham that can be hidden under bandi, coding it would be awful however and would be comparable to water boarding. It most likely would require a edited Bandi itself in the sense of decompiling it and making changes. (Which is fairly hard ,since chances are its encrypted, to do plus illegal)