What will you be doing

135

Comments

  • read on the concept of "free will" and you will understand why those things are there

    You just said that our bodies required the knowledge of a designer. Yet our actions are unbound. And btw, many respectable number of Cardinals, Bishops, Etc. believe in Evolution.
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    You just said that our bodies required the knowledge of a designer. Yet our actions are unbound. And btw, many respectable number of Cardinals, Bishops, Etc. believe in Evolution.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will

    and also

    23swsir.png

    This is the verb ‘to thank’, with a direct object ‘you’.

    In fact, you will know that this is two separate words, if you use the full sentence which is hidden underneath – ‘I thank you.’

    From this comes the shortened version which we hear daily – ‘thank you’. It is always two words.
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    You just said that our bodies required the knowledge of a designer. Yet our actions are unbound. And btw, many respectable number of Cardinals, Bishops, Etc. believe in Evolution.
    Contradicted once again.

    You really can't huh sir?

    And if you want me to quote, i will.
    lol Einstein even said it was impossible for there to be no god
    Right after I said
    lol Einstein even said it was impossible for there to be no god
    So you're implying that atheists thinking that there is no god is false, which clearly saying that I'm wrong, because you bring up Einstein and assumes it is immposible to have no god, JUST BECAUSE EINSTEIN HIMSELF SAID SO. So you're using the name of Einstein trying to prove something that is not logically or philosophically proven correct.

    Honestly, I don't know how you comprehend with anything you say with that many contradictions and bias.
  • Contradicted once again.

    You really can't huh sir?

    And if you want me to quote, i will.

    Right after I said

    So you're implying that atheists thinking that there is no god is false, which clearly saying that I'm wrong, because you bring up Einstein and assumes it is immposible to have no god, JUST BECAUSE EINSTEIN HIMSELF SAID SO. So you're using the name of Einstein trying to prove something that is not logically or philosophically proven correct.

    Honestly, I don't know how you comprehend with anything you say with that many contradictions and bias.


    again i stated my reason for my post, you're just assuming now, continue to do so lol, it has nothing to do whether he is right or wrong or whether i believe him or not.. lmao, i am not sure if you are a troll or just can't read or something, honestly humanity has no hope...
  • My Favourite Pro God Argument to counterpoint is free will.

    Point : Free-Will
    Counterpoint : God can make you have free will, but only up to not actually doing anything bad. It's God, no limits.

    Whooo Philosophy G101!


    Anywho, I will be partying like it's 1999. PS1 GAMES AND CHEETOS.
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will

    and also

    23swsir.png

    This is the verb ‘to thank’, with a direct object ‘you’.

    In fact, you will know that this is two separate words, if you use the full sentence which is hidden underneath – ‘I thank you.’

    From this comes the shortened version which we hear daily – ‘thank you’. It is always two words.
    Correcting on something completely irrelevant and totally uneccessary for the spelling through the internet that someone may care more about your points and reason rather than the time for spelling because you cannot back up your own faults with any reasonable points yourself. And using a wikipedia link on how your mind works for no reason, like it is totally relevant to what your saying about how a god exist through Einsteins words.

    Seems Legit.
    Made my sentence way too long.
  • Who the **** cares about this whole controversy. Get over yourself. You believe something different then someone else, no big deal.
  • There is being Atheist and Agnostic, however I think atheists are just ignorant. Things don't just come out of nowhere.
  • The greatest way to figure out if there is a god or not is to kneel down. And pray. If god is so powerful and all-encompassing, he would reveal himself to the world.

    Statistically, 0% of people that pray have ever come in contact with god. Hmmm...
  • There is being Atheist and Agnostic, however I think atheists are just ignorant. Things don't just come out of nowhere.

    Then how did god come from nothing? Especially considering the fact that there is scientific proof that time is finite.
  • There is being Atheist and Agnostic, however I think atheists are just ignorant. Things don't just come out of nowhere.

    Big Bang Theory?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    The greatest way to figure out if there is a god or not is to kneel down. And pray. If god is so powerful and all-encompassing, he would reveal himself to the world.

    Statistically, 0% of people that pray have ever come in contact with god. Hmmm...

    it is written that god will reveal himself in the second coming
    Delaco1 wrote: »

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics

    still doesn't answer his question
    IzConcept wrote: »
    Then how did god come from nothing? Especially considering the fact that there is scientific proof that time is finite.

    god wouldn't be god if he came from something, the creator being created does not make any sense at all
  • again i stated my reason for my post, you're just assuming now, continue to do so lol, it has nothing to do whether he is right or wrong or whether i believe him or not.. lmao, i am not sure if you are a troll or just can't read or something, honestly humanity has no hope...

    Are you serious this guy....
    i'm not gona go highlight for you anymore.
    I'm not assuming anything. I'm referring back to what you have said. I use sheer evidence, I don't jump to conclusions just because some genius in the world said it's true bro. The only reason why I'm saying Einstein is wrong is because no one has proven god to exist.
    I'm really not sure if you're trying to convince me or anyone that there is a god or not, or just trying to tell me that having no god is impossible, as you have said, because Einstein said so himself. Look what you've posted. I'm just referring back to what you've said. I don't know what you're consuming right now, but go back and have a look.

    Honestly dude there is no point in trying to educate someone like you anymore.....just go back and read.
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    Then how did god come from nothing? Especially considering the fact that there is scientific proof that time is finite.

    Hmmm.

    The way I see it.

    Concept > Einstein

    No meaning of concepts, no Einstein.

    It's not workin on this guy.



    I'm out. Hopeless forum.
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    Because cars and electronics were developed over a period of 100 years and our bodies are the cumulative result of billions of years of evolution.

    Look I don't have anything against you believing in god or not. In fact, it's scientifically impossible to prove at the moment that he doesn't exist.

    You believe in god, that's cool and all. But why is it that you worship him? I mean, didn't god create everything, ins't he aware of everything at any given moment.

    If he is, then why should I worship someone who created poverty, war, genocide, terrorism, starvation, cancer, AIDs, disparity, global warming, WMDs, ETC. if this is all Gods' doing, then why should we be worshiping him.
    God CREATED all things that are good in the universe(the earth,the sun, the moon,vegetation,animals,planets,MAN,ect)He did not create evil or things that are bad(death,poverty,terrorism,cancer,AIDS,global warming,ect). When MAN sinned in the Garden of Eden and gave into the devil, THAT is what brought EVIL into the world. After MAN had sinned God cursed MAN and the earth. Because of this God allowed all the disasters in the world to happen. There are consequences for your actions.

    Basically, God did not create the EVIL or the disasters in the world, but He allowed them to happen because of MAN's sin of giving into the devil and disobeying the one thing that God told MAN not to do. Which was not to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of GOOD and EVIL.

    This is what I believe. Just my opinion on the topic of Creation/Evolution.
  • th?id=H.4711717377344697&pid=15.1








    No one wants to hear bout religion on a f2p fps forum. Please everyone go to bed.
  • still doesn't answer his question

    Not sure how it doesn't. I gave a theory that says something always existed because it just does.

    "God always existed because he always existed"

    "The universe always existed because it always existed"

    If the justification is that God is all powerful, then I apply the same thought to the universe existing. Except it does not have any additional factors outside of always existing.

    Also, for M4A1: God is all powerful, and nothing stopped him from creating Man with willpower along with the ability to not do evil. He is God, therefore it is within his power.
  • soAnthony wrote: »
    th?id=H.4711717377344697&pid=15.1








    No one wants to hear bout religion on a f2p fps forum. Please everyone go to bed.

    too much fun rustling people's jimmies, i could honestly care less if someone believed in god or not lol
  • too much fun rustling people's jimmies, i could honestly care less if someone believed in god or not lol

    The ego in this community is powerful young one.
  • Delaco1 wrote: »
    Not sure how it doesn't. I gave a theory that says something always existed because it just does.

    "God always existed because he always existed"

    "The universe always existed because it always existed"

    If the justification is that God is all powerful, then I apply the same thought to the universe existing. Except it does not have any additional factors outside of always existing.

    Also, for M4A1: God is all powerful, and nothing stopped him from creating Man with willpower along with the ability to not do evil. He is God, therefore it is within his power.
    Are you adding to what I posted or going against something i said? Just wondering.


  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics

    still doesn't answer his question

    Ok first of all, the supposed "second law of thermodynamics" related to enthropy argument that people of faith use is not an argument against the creation of the universe. It's an argument for ID (intelligent design). This clearly demonstrates that you have very little knowledge of how these laws even support your point. But since you seem willing to argue, I'll give you a basic lesson.

    Basically, the second law of thermodynamics states that mass and energy inevitably becomes more an more chaotic over time thus making the creation of ordered things, like life, impossible without the help of a creator. However, this effect only applies to a "closed system". And since the solar system and all life on it is part of an open system, it does not create this effect.

    Hope that clears things up for you just incase you plan on playing the "second law of thermodynamics" hand again. At least next time you'll understand your own argument ;p
  • M4A1nAWM wrote: »
    Are you adding to what I posted or going against something i said? Just wondering.

    Just saying God could stop man doing anything. He's god.
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    Ok first of all, the supposed "second law of thermodynamics" related to enthropy argument that people of faith use is not an argument against the creation of the universe. It's an argument for ID (intelligent design). This clearly demonstrates that you have very little knowledge of how these laws even support your point. But since you seem willing to argue, I'll give you a basic lesson.

    Basically, the second law of thermodynamics states that mass and energy inevitably becomes more an more chaotic over time thus making the creation of ordered things, like life, impossible without the help of a creator. However, this effect only applies to a "closed system". And since the solar system and all life on it is part of an open system, it does not create this effect.

    Hope that clears things up for you just incase you plan on playing the "second law of thermodynamics" hand again. At least next time you'll understand your own argument ;p

    was just referencing that matter can not be created or destroyed
  • soAnthony wrote: »
    The ego in this community is powerful young one.

    You are 12, why even try to talk like you are older than anyone?
  • was just referencing that matter can not be created or destroyed

    That notion has nothing to do with the law of thermodynamics, that relates to the law of conservation of mass.
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    That notion has nothing to do with the law of thermodynamics, that relates to the law of conservation of mass.

    it goes along with entropy
  • it goes along with entropy

    Entropy is just a property that allows us to measure the energy in a CLOSED system since energy is not permitted to escape. Has nothing to with mass conservation, it's more like mass "containment".
  • IzConcept wrote: »
    Entropy is just a property that allows us to measure the energy in a CLOSED system since energy is not permitted to escape. Has nothing to with mass conservation, it's more like mass "containment".

    " heat energy is transferred from higher temperature components to lower temperature components."
  • soAnthony wrote: »
    th?id=H.4711717377344697&pid=15.1








    No one wants to hear bout religion on a f2p fps forum. Please everyone go to bed.
    Fair enough.
    Dam I was definately not the one who started this god existence.
    God damit.
    IzConcept wrote: »
    Ok first of all, the supposed "second law of thermodynamics" related to enthropy argument that people of faith use is not an argument against the creation of the universe. It's an argument for ID (intelligent design). This clearly demonstrates that you have very little knowledge of how these laws even support your point. But since you seem willing to argue, I'll give you a basic lesson.

    Basically, the second law of thermodynamics states that mass and energy inevitably becomes more an more chaotic over time thus making the creation of ordered things, like life, impossible without the help of a creator. However, this effect only applies to a "closed system". And since the solar system and all life on it is part of an open system, it does not create this effect.

    Hope that clears things up for you just incase you plan on playing the "second law of thermodynamics" hand again. At least next time you'll understand your own argument ;p
    Yeah. Like that'll ever happen.

    This guy man. Using complex theories out of his level of understanding from wikipedia trying to back up and relate to a topic that is completely irrelevant to the subject to make it seem like his point is valid.

    Thumbs UPPPPP.
    +1 to you AWFUL.