What will you be doing
Comments
-
AwfulFallout wrote: »read on the concept of "free will" and you will understand why those things are there
You just said that our bodies required the knowledge of a designer. Yet our actions are unbound. And btw, many respectable number of Cardinals, Bishops, Etc. believe in Evolution. -
You just said that our bodies required the knowledge of a designer. Yet our actions are unbound. And btw, many respectable number of Cardinals, Bishops, Etc. believe in Evolution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will
and also
This is the verb ‘to thank’, with a direct object ‘you’.
In fact, you will know that this is two separate words, if you use the full sentence which is hidden underneath – ‘I thank you.’
From this comes the shortened version which we hear daily – ‘thank you’. It is always two words. -
You just said that our bodies required the knowledge of a designer. Yet our actions are unbound. And btw, many respectable number of Cardinals, Bishops, Etc. believe in Evolution.
You really can't huh sir?
And if you want me to quote, i will.AwfulFallout wrote: »lol Einstein even said it was impossible for there to be no godAwfulFallout wrote: »lol Einstein even said it was impossible for there to be no god
Honestly, I don't know how you comprehend with anything you say with that many contradictions and bias. -
aTastyCookii wrote: »Contradicted once again.
You really can't huh sir?
And if you want me to quote, i will.
Right after I said
So you're implying that atheists thinking that there is no god is false, which clearly saying that I'm wrong, because you bring up Einstein and assumes it is immposible to have no god, JUST BECAUSE EINSTEIN HIMSELF SAID SO. So you're using the name of Einstein trying to prove something that is not logically or philosophically proven correct.
Honestly, I don't know how you comprehend with anything you say with that many contradictions and bias.
again i stated my reason for my post, you're just assuming now, continue to do so lol, it has nothing to do whether he is right or wrong or whether i believe him or not.. lmao, i am not sure if you are a troll or just can't read or something, honestly humanity has no hope... -
My Favourite Pro God Argument to counterpoint is free will.
Point : Free-Will
Counterpoint : God can make you have free will, but only up to not actually doing anything bad. It's God, no limits.
Whooo Philosophy G101!
Anywho, I will be partying like it's 1999. PS1 GAMES AND CHEETOS. -
AwfulFallout wrote: »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will
and also
This is the verb ‘to thank’, with a direct object ‘you’.
In fact, you will know that this is two separate words, if you use the full sentence which is hidden underneath – ‘I thank you.’
From this comes the shortened version which we hear daily – ‘thank you’. It is always two words.
Seems Legit.
Made my sentence way too long. -
-
taeyeoNNNNN wrote: »There is being Atheist and Agnostic, however I think atheists are just ignorant. Things don't just come out of nowhere.
Then how did god come from nothing? Especially considering the fact that there is scientific proof that time is finite. -
The greatest way to figure out if there is a god or not is to kneel down. And pray. If god is so powerful and all-encompassing, he would reveal himself to the world.
Statistically, 0% of people that pray have ever come in contact with god. Hmmm...
it is written that god will reveal himself in the second coming
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics
still doesn't answer his questionThen how did god come from nothing? Especially considering the fact that there is scientific proof that time is finite.
god wouldn't be god if he came from something, the creator being created does not make any sense at all -
AwfulFallout wrote: »again i stated my reason for my post, you're just assuming now, continue to do so lol, it has nothing to do whether he is right or wrong or whether i believe him or not.. lmao, i am not sure if you are a troll or just can't read or something, honestly humanity has no hope...
Are you serious this guy....
i'm not gona go highlight for you anymore.
I'm not assuming anything. I'm referring back to what you have said. I use sheer evidence, I don't jump to conclusions just because some genius in the world said it's true bro. The only reason why I'm saying Einstein is wrong is because no one has proven god to exist.
I'm really not sure if you're trying to convince me or anyone that there is a god or not, or just trying to tell me that having no god is impossible, as you have said, because Einstein said so himself. Look what you've posted. I'm just referring back to what you've said. I don't know what you're consuming right now, but go back and have a look.
Honestly dude there is no point in trying to educate someone like you anymore.....just go back and read. -
Then how did god come from nothing? Especially considering the fact that there is scientific proof that time is finite.
Hmmm.
The way I see it.
Concept > Einstein
No meaning of concepts, no Einstein.
It's not workin on this guy.
I'm out. Hopeless forum. -
Because cars and electronics were developed over a period of 100 years and our bodies are the cumulative result of billions of years of evolution.
Look I don't have anything against you believing in god or not. In fact, it's scientifically impossible to prove at the moment that he doesn't exist.
You believe in god, that's cool and all. But why is it that you worship him? I mean, didn't god create everything, ins't he aware of everything at any given moment.
If he is, then why should I worship someone who created poverty, war, genocide, terrorism, starvation, cancer, AIDs, disparity, global warming, WMDs, ETC. if this is all Gods' doing, then why should we be worshiping him.
Basically, God did not create the EVIL or the disasters in the world, but He allowed them to happen because of MAN's sin of giving into the devil and disobeying the one thing that God told MAN not to do. Which was not to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of GOOD and EVIL.
This is what I believe. Just my opinion on the topic of Creation/Evolution. -
AwfulFallout wrote: »still doesn't answer his question
Not sure how it doesn't. I gave a theory that says something always existed because it just does.
"God always existed because he always existed"
"The universe always existed because it always existed"
If the justification is that God is all powerful, then I apply the same thought to the universe existing. Except it does not have any additional factors outside of always existing.
Also, for M4A1: God is all powerful, and nothing stopped him from creating Man with willpower along with the ability to not do evil. He is God, therefore it is within his power. -
Not sure how it doesn't. I gave a theory that says something always existed because it just does.
"God always existed because he always existed"
"The universe always existed because it always existed"
If the justification is that God is all powerful, then I apply the same thought to the universe existing. Except it does not have any additional factors outside of always existing.
Also, for M4A1: God is all powerful, and nothing stopped him from creating Man with willpower along with the ability to not do evil. He is God, therefore it is within his power. -
AwfulFallout wrote: »
Ok first of all, the supposed "second law of thermodynamics" related to enthropy argument that people of faith use is not an argument against the creation of the universe. It's an argument for ID (intelligent design). This clearly demonstrates that you have very little knowledge of how these laws even support your point. But since you seem willing to argue, I'll give you a basic lesson.
Basically, the second law of thermodynamics states that mass and energy inevitably becomes more an more chaotic over time thus making the creation of ordered things, like life, impossible without the help of a creator. However, this effect only applies to a "closed system". And since the solar system and all life on it is part of an open system, it does not create this effect.
Hope that clears things up for you just incase you plan on playing the "second law of thermodynamics" hand again. At least next time you'll understand your own argument ;p -
Ok first of all, the supposed "second law of thermodynamics" related to enthropy argument that people of faith use is not an argument against the creation of the universe. It's an argument for ID (intelligent design). This clearly demonstrates that you have very little knowledge of how these laws even support your point. But since you seem willing to argue, I'll give you a basic lesson.
Basically, the second law of thermodynamics states that mass and energy inevitably becomes more an more chaotic over time thus making the creation of ordered things, like life, impossible without the help of a creator. However, this effect only applies to a "closed system". And since the solar system and all life on it is part of an open system, it does not create this effect.
Hope that clears things up for you just incase you plan on playing the "second law of thermodynamics" hand again. At least next time you'll understand your own argument ;p
was just referencing that matter can not be created or destroyed -
-
Entropy is just a property that allows us to measure the energy in a CLOSED system since energy is not permitted to escape. Has nothing to with mass conservation, it's more like mass "containment".
" heat energy is transferred from higher temperature components to lower temperature components." -
No one wants to hear bout religion on a f2p fps forum. Please everyone go to bed.
Dam I was definately not the one who started this god existence.
God damit.Ok first of all, the supposed "second law of thermodynamics" related to enthropy argument that people of faith use is not an argument against the creation of the universe. It's an argument for ID (intelligent design). This clearly demonstrates that you have very little knowledge of how these laws even support your point. But since you seem willing to argue, I'll give you a basic lesson.
Basically, the second law of thermodynamics states that mass and energy inevitably becomes more an more chaotic over time thus making the creation of ordered things, like life, impossible without the help of a creator. However, this effect only applies to a "closed system". And since the solar system and all life on it is part of an open system, it does not create this effect.
Hope that clears things up for you just incase you plan on playing the "second law of thermodynamics" hand again. At least next time you'll understand your own argument ;p
This guy man. Using complex theories out of his level of understanding from wikipedia trying to back up and relate to a topic that is completely irrelevant to the subject to make it seem like his point is valid.
Thumbs UPPPPP.
+1 to you AWFUL.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.6K CrossFire
- 746 CrossFire Announcements
- 745 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 334 Community
- 13 Modes
- 401 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 89 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 17 Looking for a Team?
- 536 CrossFire Support
- 10 Suggestion
- 16 CrossFire Guides
- 38 CrossFire Off Topic