Teams to play PDF this weekend
Comments
-
Speaking for winout - I enjoy playing against harvey, he has consistently been giving us trouble all the way back to izgangster days. Unfortunately one of our players is still in Portugal and I will be leaving tonight to go to my cottage.
Look forward to some challenging scrims the day we complete our roster and start practicing.
Hopefully that happens befor wcg is over. -
bLackOOOut wrote: »everFrag might do it. we gotta talk it over with the team tonight
and for the record, winout agreed to cast vs us this weekend. dont know why they cant play PDF...
I have no clue who you are and when you or anyone from everfrag has ever contacted me... -
RAWRsMitch wrote: »Your best bet would most likely be one of those crazy Asian clans. However chances are they have armor and would do terrible on client.
i carried those crazy asian clans.
It kinda depressing that none of the taker would be somewhat of a challenge for them. -
MyAnticheat wrote: »
When are you going to post the logs? -
I won't be, for several reasons.
1.) Most people won't know what they are looking at. So this wouldn't do anything for them.
2.) The people who have doubts, will still have the same doubts after the logs are released. They might say the logs are fake, the client messed up, etc etc. When in reality, everyone wanted this client because there are so many cheaters. When it actually catches a cheater, nobody wants to believe it. I'm sure there are many more people who cheat that you wouldn't suspect.
3.) The people who actually know what they are looking at, are the people who are coding cheats trying to bypass the client. It would be extremely foolish for me to spoon feed them information on how we detect cheats. I would be handing them a great weapon to use against MyAnticheat/ESG.
I have already explained how we detected him, which is more than enough for everyone here to understand what happened. I will post what happened once more for everyone else who has not read it.
We detected a manually mapped/injected dll without a PE header within the CrossFire application.
We detected several hooks, the first and most obvious hook was a hook made on the PlayerEntity base address, this is the address in memory that is the start of the player array. It contains information used by cheats to know what is going on with each player. There is no legitimate reason this would be hooked by any application such as XFIRE or Mumble.
The user also made calls to SetCursorPos from the memory we determined to be a cheat. This function is built into windows to move the cursor to a set X and Y coordinate on the screen.
Some other people also think the player was banned for CF Eternia, this is not true. While he may have had CF Eternia on his PC, it was not what we found.
There is no discussion if this player will be unbanned, he was given a set of rules and conditions to use the MyAnticheat client during beta and he broke them. He has been given an IP ban as well as a hardwareID ban. He will not play in ESG ever. Normally the ban would be shorter, but due to his attitude and the problems he has caused on these forums, his ban will never be lifted.
You guys asked for this system, don't complain when it does what it was built to do. Play legit if you don't want to be banned. -
-
MyAnticheat wrote: »I won't be, for several reasons.
1.) Most people won't know what they are looking at. So this wouldn't do anything for them.
2.) The people who have doubts, will still have the same doubts after the logs are released. They might say the logs are fake, the client messed up, etc etc. When in reality, everyone wanted this client because there are so many cheaters. When it actually catches a cheater, nobody wants to believe it. I'm sure there are many more people who cheat that you wouldn't suspect.
3.) The people who actually know what they are looking at, are the people who are coding cheats trying to bypass the client. It would be extremely foolish for me to spoon feed them information on how we detect cheats. I would be handing them a great weapon to use against MyAnticheat/ESG.
I have already explained how we detected him, which is more than enough for everyone here to understand what happened. I will post what happened once more for everyone else who has not read it.
We detected a manually mapped/injected dll without a PE header within the CrossFire application.
We detected several hooks, the first and most obvious hook was a hook made on the PlayerEntity base address, this is the address in memory that is the start of the player array. It contains information used by cheats to know what is going on with each player. There is no legitimate reason this would be hooked by any application such as XFIRE or Mumble.
The user also made calls to SetCursorPos from the memory we determined to be a cheat. This function is built into windows to move the cursor to a set X and Y coordinate on the screen.
Some other people also think the player was banned for CF Eternia, this is not true. While he may have had CF Eternia on his PC, it was not what we found.
There is no discussion if this player will be unbanned, he was given a set of rules and conditions to use the MyAnticheat client during beta and he broke them. He has been given an IP ban as well as a hardwareID ban. He will not play in ESG ever. Normally the ban would be shorter, but due to his attitude and the problems he has caused on these forums, his ban will never be lifted.
You guys asked for this system, don't complain when it does what it was built to do. Play legit if you don't want to be banned.
ripped . -
http://news.esea.net/index.php?s=news&d=comments&id=9159
http://news.esea.net/index.php?s=news&d=comments&id=11199
ESEA doesn't have to justify the evidence through which they ban people, for cheats or otherwise for unsportsmanlike conduct. Their players trust the anti-cheat. You guys asked for an Anti-Cheat client and that's what we're providing. Now when it's finally here you're going to turn on it and say it doesn't work? Not going to happen. If you don't like it, then move along and go play in CSN. Are you guys going to pull out the torches and pitch forks when someone gets banned there too? -
You're going to ban someone longer for having an "attitude" on the forums. I would have an attitude too if i were him, but i suppose you don't have to show "proof." Now i suppose i'm going to be banned from ESG for posting this on these forums.
Cheating during the MyAnticheat beta is not tolerated, we conduct internal tests using cheats. If you have a private cheat you would like checked out on the client, feel free to email it to admin@myanticheat.com. If you are caught cheating during beta, you will receive a minimum 2 year ban. You are supposed to be trusted enough to get an early preview and report any issues with the client, trying to bypass the client is a breach of that trust.
Do not discuss the MyAnticheat client on external websites, we will have a forum set up for beta users to report issues and discuss the client with other beta members. You will also be able to find scrims on client there, however you are free to advertise you will be scrimming on client on the z8games website, irc, or any other external website.
I'd like to point out these two rules that are for the MyAnticheat beta, everyone playing last weekend was given a link to this page with the complete set of rules and the instructions on how to obtain the client. By downloading and running the client, he agreed to these rules. Sheepbacon did not follow these two rules, and as such he will not be unbanned. -
You're going to ban someone longer for having an "attitude" on the forums. I would have an attitude too if i were him, but i suppose you don't have to show "proof." Now i suppose i'm going to be banned from ESG for posting this on these forums.
Don't be an idiot brandon, he was caught cheating and then made a big deal about it saying it was rigged which caused extra problems.
-Mini -
[MOD]Polleus wrote: »http://news.esea.net/index.php?s=news&d=comments&id=9159
http://news.esea.net/index.php?s=news&d=comments&id=11199
ESEA doesn't have to justify the evidence through which they ban people, for cheats or otherwise for unsportsmanlike conduct. Their players trust the anti-cheat. You guys asked for an Anti-Cheat client and that's what we're providing. Now when it's finally here you're going to turn on it and say it doesn't work? Not going to happen. If you don't like it, then move along and go play in CSN. Are you guys going to pull out the torches and pitch forks when someone gets banned there too?
you compare those esea bans to this...... -
![[MOD]Polleus](https://forum.z8games.com/uploads/customavatars/7/navatar_8918107.gif){kind=avatar}
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.6K CrossFire
- 746 CrossFire Announcements
- 745 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 333 Community
- 12 Modes
- 400 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 89 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 17 Looking for a Team?
- 537 CrossFire Support
- 10 Suggestion
- 16 CrossFire Guides
- 38 CrossFire Off Topic