@Saidin & every1 about MotG II

13»

Comments

  • NotBeast wrote: »
    Actually, it is the players problem that they lost to a hac.ker clan.

    They should have checked the clan's history and record before they played them like we did.

    ALL of these clans complaining now could have done what we did. We didn't care if we dodged others, we wanted to win.

    Now everyone is just mad and regret all that trash talking they did to us in the whole month of March.

    hahah you are quite funny. players problem that they lost to a hacker clan? check clan's history and record before playing? isnt this z8 job to prevent hacker from game? since when it changed to players job? Plus, no one can tell if they are playing against hacker clans or not so please stop making these trash talk. come up with better arguments then maybe the other 6 clans would stop complaining.
  • ONEPlECE wrote: »
    hahah you are quite funny. players problem that they lost to a hacker clan? check clan's history and record before playing? isnt this z8 job to prevent hacker from game? since when it changed to players job? Plus, no one can tell if they are playing against hacker clans or not so please stop making these trash talk. come up with better arguments then maybe the other 6 clans would stop complaining.

    How am I trash talking?

    Anyways, I'm off.

    Good night, and remember, that we are the SMARTEST gm clan.
  • dooplpk wrote: »
    that sucks


    we never have these problems in S&D events.

    Probably because it's not Z8 organizing them.
  • iDagnasty wrote: »
    Probably because it's not Z8 organizing them.

    Hint hint, nudge nudge.
  • ONEPlECE wrote: »
    hahah you are quite funny. players problem that they lost to a hacker clan? check clan's history and record before playing? isnt this z8 job to prevent hacker from game? since when it changed to players job? Plus, no one can tell if they are playing against hacker clans or not so please stop making these trash talk. come up with better arguments then maybe the other 6 clans would stop complaining.

    When you see a team composed of corporals, who all have 100+ Kdr in GM, it's pretty suspicious you know... (I won't talk about the language and country of these clans)
  • Alright guys. Let's calm down.
    I'm going to point out a few things about this tourney that many haven't taken into consideration.

    -Time constraints.
    Z8 needed the tourney done by the end of March, no if ands or buts. Save for the finals. This was unavoidable. As many know if they go into businesses, schedules are usually pretty tight and need to be kept on track to keep things running.
    Given that it was only 1 month, its not alot of time even for a bracket style tournament unless it was small or rushed. Especially considering the number of clans out there, thats nigh impossible.
    The results had to be set in stone by the date, and as much as it pains, there isn't anything that can be done about it now.

    -Size
    As noted before, keeping track of that many people is rather hard, especially in such a short timeframe. I know its not the most ideal or fair scenario that clans suffered losses due to some illegitimate instances or just bad luck. 30 games per clan is alot to track and investigate for god knows how many clans participated in only 30 days. I'm sure the games were ridiculously high just for one day. Would take quite alot of people to tear through that in the restrictive timeline.

    -The system
    Yes, its not perfect. Few rarely are. This was an attempt to try something new. It didn't work out flawlessly this time, with things such as the timing and size of the tournament that happened and others. But thats where trial and error comes in. I'm sure they will keep this in mind for when the next tournament happens. It was an experiment, whether it was a success or failure.

    Even though many are quite unhappy with the results, I should say that this wasn't the first, nor will it be the last tourney they host. There's chances to get your game on in the future.

    Flaming won't change the results and nor will bashing. Constructive criticism on how to improve is what helps things. And being respectful to those that did make it, even if you disagree with it. That's what sportsmanship is about after all.
    It may not have been the ideal tournament for some, but it was nonetheless a tournament. A finished tournament at that.

    So let's be mature about this and instead of raging on about how it how disappointing it was.
    Let's not ruin any future opportunities with spite, that kills any chance of there being other chances of things being improved.

    Granted, I'm probably missing a few things, especially with how late it is. But I will have to close this. If you would like to discuss this further, please do it amongst yourselves privately.

    Thanks.
This discussion has been closed.