Coalition of legit clans
Comments
-
-
The link to the page is broken, this works for uk servers only??
We do not play on these servers, our ping is high 150/200, We play in the U.S. server ping 45/80 and in clan server ping 70/150
Bonecrusher 269 rank clan Latinoamericano
BUD abandoned it, it's currently dead. -
I've seen this for the first time lol.
A coalition for clans that's been already on for 8 months and I've known nothing about it. It's a bit strange isn't it? If the thread was more spoken about, more clans would join and more people will know about it ! -
I've seen this for the first time lol.
A coalition for clans that's been already on for 8 months and I've known nothing about it. It's a bit strange isn't it? If the thread was more spoken about, more clans would join and more people will know about it !
It was spread. I even tried to reiterate it, but was unable to. It's been dead since the remodel and failure of said remodel. -
-
-
Same, they're kicking my members, calling them hackers. We're on the list and even brutal knows us.
I know, right? They knew full well who I was, I stated several times that it was an alt and even told them my main IGN. If it wasn't for the other forumers (<3 Vu and Kat) they'd probably have been raging until I got kicked.. -
-
-
Why would we need a sticky then? We don't want every single clan to come, it would be too hard to manage, just 5-10 clans. Maybe send a message to clans who have a recruitment thread on the forums.
Instead of making it so complicated why not st make it about one thing, we don't need a website or anything, just the awareness. That's the problem, everyone wants it to be fancy but that will cause more work.
I will bump the new thread everyday to make people aware of it, I don't need no sticky! -
I'll see if I can talk to brutal again tomorrow.
Why talk someone who failed and denied your request? Just remake a new one. Proof shows the Brutal himself broke the main rule plenty of times, what's a leader who breaks his own rules?
I have nothing against Brutal but we need someone who is active in being this kind of leader. Having WAL make a new one would be the smartest move for now. (philosophy is a bit.. Dramatic) -
FrozenSyther wrote: »Why talk someone who failed and denied your request? Just remake a new one. Proof shows the Brutal himself broke the main rule plenty of times, what's a leader who breaks his own rules?
I have nothing against Brutal but we need someone who is active in being this kind of leader. Having WAL make a new one would be the smartest move for now. (philosophy is a bit.. Dramatic)
Well then if I'm so dramatic, good luck WAL on making the new one. Which they already attempted and didn't go through. Frozen, I never made a new one, so I never failed to make a new one.
Good bye now. -
Well then if I'm so dramatic, good luck WAL on making the new one. Which they already attempted and didn't go through. Frozen, I never made a new one, so I never failed to make a new one.
Good bye now.
I have nothing against you but you have to look ahead. If you make one I will support you 98% and I know you never made one. -
FrozenSyther wrote: »I have nothing against you but you have to look ahead. If you make one I will support you 98% and I know you never made one.
So don't say he denied my request.
I was getting request for WAL. I was helping Taylor make a new LCC.
I do look ahead. Why do you think I'm eh about making a new one. Because I know I won't be so into unless if a bunch of clans actually want to. -
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 715 CrossFire Announcements
- 714 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 322 Community
- 12 Modes
- 393 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 73 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 524 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 37 CrossFire Off Topic