More detail over more maps?

SuxuS · November 2009

Anybody else think we should have more details in a map over more maps, if anybody played Combat Arms im sure you can see what im talking about. Different landscape levels, rocks for cover etc etc

[dot] · November 2009

I haven't played Combat Arms, but this game feels way too fast paced for this to be useful.

MyAWM · November 2009

something like that forest map in warrock?(forgot what it was called) where snipers are all over the place and a few riflers running around/rushing. good times good times

FnC[Dhalia · November 2009

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!

gbg112 · November 2009

Peaple who say crossfire is to fast pace for this haven't used it.

I have used cover in game and its a amazing thing to do.

eeeeeeeeeev · November 2009

I think it's good enough.

[dot] · November 2009

gbg112 wrote: »

Peaple who say crossfire is to fast pace for this haven't used it.

I have used cover in game and its a amazing thing to do.

I've most likely played this game longer then you.

My point was merely that any cover you use - you use based on what you see, not from the minimap.

IamRag · November 2009

crossfire is an URBAN fps. they will not change this two soon, they keep detail to a minimum so we can download the game faster and start it up. Im sure im not the only one who doesnt want to wait 5 minutes just to use a gilli suit. sorry to disapoint you fellas