More detail over more maps?

SuxuS

Anybody else think we should have more details in a map over more maps, if anybody played Combat Arms im sure you can see what im talking about. Different landscape levels, rocks for cover etc etc

[dot]

I haven't played Combat Arms, but this game feels way too fast paced for this to be useful.

MyAWM

something like that forest map in warrock?(forgot what it was called) where snipers are all over the place and a few riflers running around/rushing. good times good times

FnC[Dhalia

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!

gbg112

Peaple who say crossfire is to fast pace for this haven't used it.

I have used cover in game and its a amazing thing to do.

eeeeeeeeeev

I think it's good enough.

[dot]

gbg112 wrote: »

Peaple who say crossfire is to fast pace for this haven't used it.

I have used cover in game and its a amazing thing to do.

I've most likely played this game longer then you.


My point was merely that any cover you use - you use based on what you see, not from the minimap.

IamRag

crossfire is an URBAN fps. they will not change this two soon, they keep detail to a minimum so we can download the game faster and start it up. Im sure im not the only one who doesnt want to wait 5 minutes just to use a gilli suit. sorry to disapoint you fellas

DoctorBee

I cant see crossfire with a forest or jungle map. It's more like town stuff, buildings etc.

IamRag

daniel8u wrote: »

I cant see crossfire with a forest or jungle map. It's more like town stuff, buildings etc.

exactly what i said. URBAN u understand that? URBAN

MrLondon

dot1 wrote: »

I haven't played Combat Arms, but this game feels way too fast paced for this to be useful.

fast pace? try playing combat arms lol