Can we put a signature ?
Hi,
Only a quickly question. All member there can put any signature picture ?
So yes or not, if not why ?
if not why? in my opinion any member here can put any signature if this is a forum. I think member,mod,gm can put picture signature this is the first forum i see whit no picture signature.
What do you think about that ?. Can you put back it for all member of this forum can put any signature ? if not why?.
Just think about it.
PS: My english grammar is bad.
Only a quickly question. All member there can put any signature picture ?
So yes or not, if not why ?
if not why? in my opinion any member here can put any signature if this is a forum. I think member,mod,gm can put picture signature this is the first forum i see whit no picture signature.
What do you think about that ?. Can you put back it for all member of this forum can put any signature ? if not why?.
Just think about it.
PS: My english grammar is bad.
Comments
-
Hi,
Only a quickly question. All member there can put any signature picture ?
So yes or not, if not why ?
if not why? in my opinion any member here can put any signature if this is a forum. I think member,mod,gm can put picture signature this is the first forum i see whit no picture signature.
What do you think about that ?. Can you put back it for all member of this forum can put any signature ? if not why?.
Just think about it.
PS: My english grammar is bad.
Mods/GMs get Picture signatures.
We don't. -
Hi,
Only a quickly question. All member there can put any signature picture ?
So yes or not, if not why ?
if not why? in my opinion any member here can put any signature if this is a forum. I think member,mod,gm can put picture signature this is the first forum i see whit no picture signature.
What do you think about that ?. Can you put back it for all member of this forum can put any signature ? if not why?.
Just think about it.
PS: My english grammar is bad.
Well, for one, we don't get pictures in our signatures because our Community could abuse it easily. It's not really necessary for us anyways, it's only for looks, so we should be pretty fine without it.
Only MODS/GMS can currently use pictures.
In my opinion I don't mind whether we have it or not.
-
Quote from another thread -[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »Manpower isn't really the issue, save the the ability to enforce. There's more involved than just saying 'approved', since if people have a rotator like I do, they could simply change it later without such.
Then we run into the problem of moderation, not being able to edit or remove signatures is a heavy problem that the current boards are not capable of handling.
I'm sure with time, more privileges will come once its possible.
They may make it available if the MODs are given powers to edit people signatures and maybe not. I can understand why they dont allow sigs because alot of this community are quite young and can lead to immature pictures. -
Hi,
Only a quickly question. All member there can put any signature picture ?
So yes or not, if not why ?
if not why? in my opinion any member here can put any signature if this is a forum. I think member,mod,gm can put picture signature this is the first forum i see whit no picture signature.
What do you think about that ?. Can you put back it for all member of this forum can put any signature ? if not why?.
Just think about it.
PS: My english grammar is bad.
As stated above, only [MOD]s and [GM]s are able to have pictures in their signatures. -
Gh0st_Slay3r wrote: »Quote from another thread -
They may make it available if the MODs are given powers to edit people signatures and maybe not. I can understand why they dont allow sigs because alot of this community are quite young and can lead to immature pictures.
Hum, all forum have some law about this, so normally all forum have rule.
Well if some kid put immature picture ban them of the forum thats all mod/gm is there for that. I think is simple and if some people abuse ban them for 1 day of the forum i dont know. Well what do you think about it ? its time for kid to being more mature anyway so. -
Yeah its maybe for looks but this is awsome i mean this is helpful if you wont to put a link inside (hypertexte) and more.. i can said alot about itWell, for one, we don't get pictures in our signatures because our Community could abuse it easily. It's not really necessary for us anyways, it's only for looks, so we should be pretty fine without it.
Only MODS/GMS can currently use pictures.
In my opinion I don't mind whether we have it or not.
-
Hum, all forum have some law about this, so normally all forum have rule.
Well if some kid put immature picture ban them of the forum thats all mod/gm is there for that. I think is simple and if some people abuse ban them for 1 day of the forum i dont know. Well what do you think about it ? its time for kid to being more mature anyway so.
There is still the fact that the MODS cant remove the sig. Even if a person is banned their past posts are still shown and I'm guessing so is their sig.
Anyway I actually like it the way it is, it makes it easy to spot out who the MODs and GMs are in the mass of posts. -
No,Hi,
Only a quickly question. All member there can put any signature picture ?
So yes or not, if not why ?
if not why? in my opinion any member here can put any signature if this is a forum. I think member,mod,gm can put picture signature this is the first forum i see whit no picture signature.
What do you think about that ?. Can you put back it for all member of this forum can put any signature ? if not why?.
Just think about it.
PS: My english grammar is bad.
why? Because if the community players have the power of have a BB code image, players willing to have disturbing images. Having to block or ban people with disturbing images it's a other more work to add. Just regular players is willing to put disturbing images in their sig & avatar(which i encounter).
MOD's are more likely to have more responsibility based on the Avatar & sig rules & is easy to keep an eye out who violates the rules then having Millions of people violating the rules. -
Gh0st_Slay3r wrote: »There is still the fact that the MODS cant remove the sig. Even if a person is banned their past posts are still shown and I'm guessing so is their sig.
Anyway I actually like it the way it is, it makes it easy to spot out who the MODs and GMs are in the mass of posts.
They could still delete the post (or the entire thread if it's the OP's post).
I personally think getting pictures in everyone's signature would just make most of the threads very tiring to read. Think about it, every thread would be like the "post your screenshot" one, with pictures everywhere. Plus it'd be a huge pain for those with a slow internet connection.
PS : Epic sig my Gh0st! -
Mods is here for do this job. For ban them of forum looks if all is good and more things.DynoDragon wrote: »No,
why? Because if the community players have the power of have a BB code image, players willing to have disturbing images. Having to block or ban people with disturbing images it's a other more work to add. Just regular players is willing to put disturbing images in their sig & avatar(which i encounter).
MOD's are more likely to have more responsibility based on the Avatar & sig rules & is easy to keep an eye out who violates the rules then having Millions of people violating the rules. -
MisterMunzta wrote: »They could still delete the post (or the entire thread if it's the OP's post).
Well imagine I put something offensive in my sig and they ban me... They would still have to go through and delete all 3000 posts I've made to get rid of the problem lol xDPS : Epic sig my Gh0st!
Just amazing right? hehe -
Gh0st_Slay3r wrote: »Well imagine I put something offensive in my sig and they ban me... They would still have to go through and delete all 3000 posts I've made to get rid of the problem lol xD
Add an option : "delete all users posts".
Seriously, it'd be very problematic indeed, and you're right about the fact that the community isn't mature enough to get such a dangerous option. -
Mods is here for do this job. For ban them of forum looks if all is good and more things.
Banning everyone on sight who does something that violates the rules because of a signature we can't remove is not something we do. Instead, it's easier to deny it altogether rather than worry about that problem.
Secondly, we already have people violating the simple text version of signatures. If people manage to mess that up, its quite clear that alot of the community can't be trusted with it. -
Indeed,Mods is here for do this job. For ban them of forum looks if all is good and more things.
throwing of a MOD to look for many people who has 2 things, Disturbing avatar & Signatures is a major job. 1 can't do it all, we are a BIG community, if all is needed we need to have a MOD to keep an eye out those who are flaming, spamming, making post based on a member directy, etc....
It's a good thing we don't have that permission to use image bb coding. It can get off hand if people have the privilege on having image sig. -
Secondly, we already have people violating the simple text version of signatures. If people manage to mess that up, its quite clear that alot of the community can't be trusted with it.
^^^^^
Yes i have overcome them. is what i said on my previous comment. Since i spot certain people violating the rules of Image in Avatar or & Sig, then simple...is their trust in our community?No. Is why there would be to much extra work on that prospective side & it will get out of hand. -
Hum,
Well i thinks all mod have to know how to delete a sig and ban a people in a forum because this is important if someone violated a rule.
Sigs is important for alot of thing.
Big job... yea i know but this is a job of mods.
Moderator is supposing to be there so support and help the (GM).
Help him for do alot of thing. -
I understand,Hum,
Well i thinks all mod have to know how to delete a sig and ban a people in a forum because this is important if someone violated a rule.
Sigs is important for alot of thing.
Big job... yea i know but this is a job of mods.
Moderator is supposing to be there so support and help the (GM).
Help him for do alot of thing.
i would love to use my signature. but i won't because let say i get to use it right? then everyone would want to use it, then certain one will use it correctly wise & other & most will violate the rules. -
Give us a chance a last chance can be nice for us anyway.
all of us can have a second chance thats the life.
If alot of people put alot of bad sigs then put it back to that.
Well this is only weird no one mod here know this jobs.
I dont talk about all Mods. -
Well i thinks all mod have to know how to delete a sig and ban a people in a forum because this is important if someone violated a rule.
Sigs is important for alot of thing.
It's not a matter if we know how to or not.
It's the fact we CAN'T delete signatures. We simply do not have that capability. Even the text based ones we can't edit or remove. -
In your sigs you are supposed to put your forum name or name in game.DynoDragon wrote: »I understand,
i would love to use my signature. but i won't because let say i get to use it right? then everyone would want to use it, then certain one will use it correctly wise & other & most will violate the rules.
Why other people need your sigs if inside of them you had your forum name or the name in game... ?.
All supposed to create a own sigs and being creatif for make it. -
Hum,
Well i thinks all mod have to know how to delete a sig and ban a people in a forum because this is important if someone violated a rule.
Sigs is important for alot of thing.
Big job... yea i know but this is a job of mods.
Moderator is supposing to be there so support and help the (GM).
Help him for do alot of thing.
Sigs aren't that important. If you're thinking of an image that shows your stats (kinda like Talon's) then I'll have to be honest : most people don't care, and with a simple line of text giving your IGN out, the ones who do cares will be able to go to your profile page.
MODs already have a tough job. Moderating is indeed their self imposed duty, but it's not a reason to give them a lot more work.
This is a game's forum, there are lots of children, allowing such an option could be shocking for some. And I don't think it's actually true (can someone tell me?), but there could be a some legal issues if inappropriate pictures slip through the MOD's attention and stay on the forum. -
Okay.[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »It's not a matter if we know how to or not.
It's the fact we CAN'T delete signatures. We simply do not have that capability. Even the text based ones we can't edit or remove.
But in the oldest time did you had this capacity to remove it?
When alot of people using it ?
_____________________________________________________
I think if you ban someone else in a forum whit sigs thats remove all of his post (auto).
(In all general forum) -
You going on behalf what other are doing. It's not a "you need to do it", it's more like people set their IGN so who they are In Game. Other don't have that, some have something funny or a quote that a famous guy said.In your sigs you are supposed to put your forum name or name in game.
Why other people need your sigs if inside of them you had your forum name or the name in game... ?.
All supposed to create a own sigs and being creatif for make it.
We & i do me & other who agree, just trying to avoid a other issue to the community. Once again there has been people violating in Signature & avatar.
Like the old saying...."if it happen once, second time...it'll happen again".. -
MisterMunzta wrote: »Sigs aren't that important. If you're thinking of an image that shows your stats (kinda like Talon's) then I'll have to be honest : most people don't care, and with a simple line of text giving your IGN out, the ones who do cares will be able to go to your profile page.
MODs already have a tough job. Moderating is indeed their self imposed duty, but it's not a reason to give them a lot more work.
This is a game's forum, there are lots of children, allowing such an option could be shocking for some. And I don't think it's actually true (can someone tell me?), but there could be a some legal issues if inappropriate pictures slip through the MOD's attention and stay on the forum.
Well if here have alot of children in this forum why you dont see one immature child in this thread.
I know mod have alot of jobs, have children, but they supposed to watch the forum 1,3 hours this is important anyway mod supposed to be ative jsut looks at the mods list they had what 12-10 mods around it. I think all mod can give 10% each of the time for it and maybe 5% because here have alot of mod. -
No one can write the rest of year, maybe this is not gonna happen again. No one know anyway why dont give an other chance. Why not? we dont have time to lost so.. we can try in 5-4 year i being in this forum dude i never saw some immature people here so ?. If you find a immature thread send it here then.DynoDragon wrote: »You going on behalf what other are doing. It's not a "you need to do it", it's more like people set their IGN so who they are In Game. Other don't have that, some have something funny or a quote that a famous guy said.
We & i do me & other who agree, just trying to avoid a other issue to the community. Once again there has been people violating in Signature & avatar.
Like the old saying...."if it happen once, second time...it'll happen again".. -
Not sure if you understand me, but i never mention something about immature.No one can write the rest of year, maybe this is not gonna happen again. No one know anyway why dont give an other chance. Why not? we dont have time to lost so.. we can try in 5-4 year i being in this forum dude i never saw some immature people here so ?. If you find a immature thread send it here then.
I'm saying is people has been founded using bad avatar pictures. If the community has been caught having bad avatar & signature, then why give a chance to those who has broken the rules?
if we give chance to those who has never broken the rules, then it won't be fair to others. -
Well if here have alot of children in this forum why you dont see one immature child in this thread.
I know mod have alot of jobs, have children, but they supposed to watch the forum 1,3 hours this is important anyway mod supposed to be ative jsut looks at the mods list they had what 12-10 mods around it. I think all mod can give 10% each of the time for it and maybe 5% because here have alot of mod.
MODs don't just lock threads, they do lots of stuff (I hope so, at least). You can't expect them to delete all the posts made. Gh0st wrote it earlier, and Talon explained it as well, the signatures can't be edited by mods, and it stays on all the posts made y the user.we can try in 5-4 year i being in this forum dude i never saw some immature people here so ?. If you find a immature thread send it here then.
I don't know if you're saying you're on this forum since 2008 (which is obviously not true), but anyway : most immature content was removed by MODs, and most immature forumers were banned or left. I'm talking about "immature" in a harmful way, not just trolling lightly or such. -
Sorry just looks other comment and i see they talkin' about immature people. But i am sure if they have a second chance no one gonna broken the rule i see alot of thread and no one looks immature i mean i think no one gonna put bad sigs. Second chance is fine we can proof all of us is mature in this forum.DynoDragon wrote: »Not sure if you understand me, but i never mention something about immature.
I'm saying is people has been founded using bad avatar pictures. If the community has been caught having bad avatar & signature, then why give a chance to those who has broken the rules?
if we give chance to those who has never broken the rules, then it won't be fair to others.
_____________________________________________________________
Hum,
You dont need to put your IGN inside the sigs only your forum name is fine. Hypertexte is fine for put inside the sigs. -
Delete forum is not a hard jobs this is easy. Well i thing alot of immature forumers here is left because in like 3-4 year i never saw a immature thread. Dont think so also one is gonna broken the rule of sigs if sigs is cool. Why broken a rule if you like it, I know the sigs is not edited by mods. Mods dont have thats job you need to make your own sigs whit paint.net or a $ version like mine photoshop.MisterMunzta wrote: »MODs don't just lock threads, they do lots of stuff (I hope so, at least). You can't expect them to delete all the posts made. Gh0st wrote it earlier, and Talon explained it as well, the signatures can't be edited by mods, and it stays on all the posts made y the user.
I don't know if you're saying you're on this forum since 2008 (which is obviously not true), but anyway : most immature content was removed by MODs, and most immature forumers were banned or left. I'm talking about "immature" in a harmful way, not just trolling lightly or such.
![[Seashore]](https://forum.z8games.com/uploads/customavatars/39/navatar_12098639.gif){kind=avatar}
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 951 CrossFire Announcements
- 942 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 600 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 702 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 28 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic