Can we put a signature ?

DynoD

Monstah99 wrote: »

Sorry just looks other comment and i see they talkin' about immature people. But i am sure if they have a second chance no one gonna broken the rule i see alot of thread and no one looks immature i mean i think no one gonna put bad sigs. Second chance is fine we can proof all of us is mature in this forum.
_____________________________________________________________

Hum,

You dont need to put your IGN inside the sigs only your forum name is fine. Hypertexte is fine for put inside the sigs.

It's okay dear friend,

I clearly understand you. but think about those who broken the rules already. not a fair look if the MOD or & GM give them a opportunity on have a image as a signature right?

Monstah99

DynoDragon wrote: »

It's okay dear friend,

I clearly understand you. but think about those who broken the rules already. not a fair look if the MOD or & GM give them a opportunity on have a image as a signature right?

Yea i know what you are talking about seriously is not fun to open it back and some people broke the fun of it. Well we can maybe try 1 week and if this is not work stop it. Think about it

MrVu1

Monstah99 wrote: »

Delete forum is not a hard jobs this is easy. Well i thing alot of immature forumers here is left because in like 3-4 year i never saw a immature thread. Dont think so also one is gonna broken the rule of sigs if sigs is cool. Why broken a rule if you like it, I know the sigs is not edited by mods. Mods dont have thats job you need to make your own sigs whit paint.net or a $ version like mine photoshop.

Deleting 2000 posts from the same user takes a lot of time, it may not be mentally challenging, I agree, but it's still a pain. Plus if you consider the fact that it'd take 2 minutes for the user to create another account.
There's already one guy, the whatever-his-name-is-censored guy, who just spams the barracks from time to time.

Maybe the forumers are quite responsible right now, but new ones always come, and we never know when someone just comes to ruin the party.

Monstah99

MisterMunzta wrote: »

Deleting 2000 posts from the same user takes a lot of time, it may not be mentally challenging, I agree, but it's still a pain. Plus if you consider the fact that it'd take 2 minutes for the user to create another account.
There's already one guy, the whatever-his-name-is-censored guy, who just spams the barracks from time to time.

Maybe the forumers are quite responsible right now, but new ones always come, and we never know when someone just comes to ruin the party.

If someone make to much trouble and dont understand to stop IP ban him. Well i dont think about someone had 2k post is a long time to delete it yea. But i think if you ban a man this is delete all of his post in same time.
(general forum)

Talonblaze

Monstah99 wrote: »

If someone make to much trouble and dont understand to stop IP ban him.

Because we never thought of that. :rolleyes:

Monstah99

[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »

Because we never thought of that. :rolleyes:

Yea i know and dont IP ban me i dont make any trouble lol.

DynoD

[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »

Because we never thought of that. :rolleyes:

hahaha nice

MrVu1

Monstah99 wrote: »

If someone make to much trouble and dont understand to stop IP ban him. Well i dont think about someone had 2k post is a long time to delete it yea. But i think if you ban a man this is delete all of his post in same time.
(general forum)

Here, posts from banned forumers stay, and MODs have to manually delete them one by one (I don't think there's a delete all option), or delete threads.

Changing your IP isn't such a hard challenge

Monstah99

MisterMunzta wrote: »

Here, posts from banned forumers stay, and MODs have to manually delete them one by one (I don't think there's a delete all option), or delete threads.

Changing your IP isn't such a hard challenge

Oh god yea dont thinking of that ;o

Monstah99

just looks that awsome sigs