Gameplay or Graphics??

graphics really don't mean anything if the game sucks so gameplay

both, but mostly gameplay.


it adds to the game if the world is nice, like skyrim.
but if the gameplay is good, graphics doesn't really bother me.
i'll just take a walk in my gallery if the graphics aren't satisfying.

For a game to really be any good, I find story, music and gameplay the most important things. Those three should always go before anything else, really.

So gameplay I guess.

I_LoveTheUSA wrote: »

Which one do u prefer?? To me i prefer gameplay, i choose whichever that fits my style. That is why i choose Crossfire over AVA, MW3 over BF3...

lol.

I'm not too bothered really. If a game has amazing graphics and gameplay then sure but it has to be something that will keep my attention span, a game can be great to play but if it's not particularly interesting or challenging then it's boring. Although if it's the 7th or so incarnation of a game and nothing's changed then I can't really be bothered with it.

NotCookz wrote: »

Tight FOVs
Horrible reg
Cheaters galore
Terrible players
Fake 'competitive' scene
Over-powered guns
Played by fatties
QQ
Money-grabbing devs
Boring after 10 minutes of play


Yup, CF and MW3 sure are different huh?


OT: Gameplay. As dot said, it's nice if there's a good combination of both, but I've seen beautiful games that have been unplayable due to the fact the game's trash, i.e. Flatout 3

Only an idiot would even bother comparing a f2p to a p2p

And I'm not saying by any means crossfire is a good game, Off the top ava is better in every aspect and it's f2p as well but comparing f2p with p2p?

You'll have to go back as far as delta force for crossfire to even be able to remotely compare decently

Gameplay and if the game has good graphics its an added bonus.

graphics make gameplay better

gameplay does not make graphics better


you're asking people on a CROSSFIRE FORUM which they prefer. people here do not know what art is.

Gameplay for sure. Graphics are just an additional bonus. ( Well, I think)

TruthHurtsU wrote: »

graphics make gameplay better

gameplay does not make graphics better


you're asking people on a CROSSFIRE FORUM which they prefer. people here do not know what art is.

Graphics don't mean anything in-terms of how the game is played. The facts you stated are not true at all. Graphics simply makes the game look better, but does not really matter to people who play hardcore games. The only reason some people consider graphics over game play is because they think that the game will be only good if it has good graphics like mw3. For me, I would prefer great game play and decent graphics.

You know CF suks when Saidin plays more LoL matchs then he does CF (total).




That look on [MOD]Hi's face.

/priceless.

MarkChub wrote: »

why would you ask this question if the answer is so obvious?

Well, the answer is more individual than obvious.

Kids who sit with their crossfire'd-latest-edition graphic cards probably care more about the game looking good than feeling good.
The same people who plays trash games like Crysis because THEY SO PRETTY and such.

as long as there is kfc