heres an idea how to stop hackers

This belongs under "Suggestions".

Also, this would not stop people from hacking.

U_U wrote: »

I must have an IQ of 3.

Actually, you have an IQ of "3s".

Seriously...150 Kills?

Why don't we just all download aimbots and just shoot ourselves in the foot while we're at it?

Post it under suggestions... and changing the mission's objectives to one singular objective doesn't really make hackers go away, it just reorganizes them to use a particular hack now.

The problem is not the mission, it is with the X-trap bypasses that are used along with the hacks. Patch the bypass and the hack is worthless for the time-being.

A personal note: You don't have to do the daily mission if you are slaughtered by SOOO many hackers as such. Pubbing is another great way of getting your EXP & GP. Or start clan warring with other members.

Daily missions are here, not just for RF, but to also keep us occupied when people don't know what to play or if they need that extra 1000 EXP for 5 missions done... or any other reward.

Thanks for the "suggestion" but you should have posted there, not here

warhawkqq wrote: »

if there was a bypass i would have had one by now and i would be farming.

sad .

cazxc wrote: »

instead of having monthly "WINNING" rounds on a retarrded map
lets try to do "150 kills"
and if you have a IQ of 5 you should understand what i mean. unfortunately you guys know who has IQ of 3s

If the hacker has an IQ of 5, what exactly would stop him from joining an "150 kill' room? You said something like "oh no, he's gonna steal my kills...." or so. What? I'm sorry, I don't hack, so obviously I don't have the necessary 5 IQ points. Or, you have no idea what you are writting.

alkiroth225 wrote: »

That is the dumbest idea I've heard since.. peanut butter an jelly(who in his right mind would..).

More kills for a single mission only mean matches will last longer and hackers will have more kills.

It has happened to me before. I joined a match and it was a total loss. 32-64(100) until a hacker showed up and along with our kills, we won the match and nobody in my team gave a flying fluff. I know I didn't. I just wanted to finish that stupid mission so I could go back to playing legit and kicking hackers.

Blow yourself, dik.
Not even trying to kick a hacker.

>.>............

alkiroth225 wrote: »

That is the dumbest idea

VS.

alkiroth225 wrote: »

I joined a match and it was a total loss. 32-64(100) until a hacker showed up and along with our kills, we won the match and nobody in my team gave a flying fluff. I know I didn't. I just wanted to finish that stupid mission so I could go back to playing legit and kicking hackers.

No, the stupidest idea around here is not kicking the hackers because you'd have lost without him...>__>

Terribad idea,
just deal with it.

Chimpzz wrote: »

Good idea, one just need full faculties to realize it.

I don't see how this could be considered a "good idea". Sure, people may get annoyed that the hacker is getting the majority of the kills, but that doesn't mean that they'll kick the hacker either. The majority of players won't/don't kick hackers, regardless of the situation (although there's usually 1-3 people who do, although it wouldn't guarantee a kick).

Chimpzz wrote: »

Because it removes the incentive to keep an hacker for 'wins' because it is wins required currently.

People for example trying to do a 45 kill S&D mission are not going to allow a shoot through the wall hacker to mow down the enemy at spawn time each round for 13 rounds, and just sit there like lemons for a 'win' they do not need.

I realize that, but even so, a lot of players have the mindset that a hacker is beneficial to them, despite the fact that they may be reducing their chances of completing the daily mission. Most people want to win just because of the potential satisfaction that it could bring.

I suppose this idea could work, but I don't see it drastically changing what people do about hackers in-game in the future.

Caspah12354 wrote: »

how bout z8 just do silent patches every week.

seems pretty reasonable. everytime z8 patches they have to make new hacks, so why not keep them so busy towhere they just give up?

Z8 is nothing more than a portal/website.

X-TRAP is the hack detection system that needs to be patched in order to prevent old hacks from being used. And X-TRAP does so "silent patches", since they patch randomly without any warning, although they aren't done "every week."

Caspah12354 wrote: »

seems like "every month"

Yeah, pretty much.

Chimpzz wrote: »

Good idea, one just need full faculties to realize it.

Agreed, If the mission Stated that we have to "WIN" then we have to win, which is virtually impossible.
But with Kills, we're able to save those statistics and have a chance to complete our daily mission,
WAS A 3, Now a 5

one_9 wrote: »

The idea probably behind this "suggestion" is because people are "wanting" to win those winning missions... therefore create exceptions to allow hackers on their side to ensure that win.

I personally don't see the necessity of having a hacker on my team cause I lose the fun as it is into accomplishing the mission...

Classic example... Complex wins as GR. Get a walling hacker... POOF Game over. 5 rounds of waiting frozen in place while the hacker turns his character to the left (or right) and just starts spraying the general area where the BL ghosts are when they spawn in a new round.

*YAWN* Guess I should do my hw while CF is on... it's not like I'm gonna get any better with all these hackers ruining my fun gameplay experience.

Conclusion. I kick hackers not just to keep things fair between both sides, but to ensure that I get my continued dose of fun for me.

Also agreed
Although the contend is basically a Hack war
So Good point, but yea... it's the hackers that made us all to suggest some sort of an ultimatum which is quite a shame