Nvidia GTX 560 TI

2»

Comments

  • well man i didnt understand your message, but thats okay, im sorry if i insulted you or something like that. we can be friends if u want =)
  • OOOOHH now i understand, sorry im slow. Im not anyone of those guys my ign is *Today*. I just started reading the forums i dont wanna fight with anyone though. take care bro
  • I'm so getting this card for my birthday! :D
  • KimiKelKu wrote: »
    200fps, u cant get more then that.

    You can defiantly get more than 200.
    NiceKDboi wrote: »
    My ATI radeon 5650 along with my i5 intel core gives me 220 fps in 4v4 and about 180 fps in 8v8, I think ur card is a lil better so yeah...

    Ahaha I also have a ATI 5056 with 1gb dedicated and a intel core i5 processor :) Buttt mines in a 18.4inch laptop lol. Mine likes to hover around the 200fps mark in 8v8. I also get 34-40ping.
  • badboy051 wrote: »
    35, 400 , 4000 FPS... You guys beat yourself up over FPS. Your eyes can not see beyond 50 FPS..... Although 30fps is fluid, 50 fps seems to be the limit to the eye's perception. Anything over 50fps is virtually impossible to notice... So if your game is running @ 30 to 50 FPS your fine...

    My mouse starts lagging hardly when I have less than 60 FPS in Crossfire. When I have less than 30 I cannot turn my char when I move my arm across my whole table (~2meters) :P

    So more FPS change something. I don't care about what my eyes see. I only need 15 FPS to see a smooth movement.
  • Seriously, this game could run on the cheapest card available, my card isn't that dear and i can get 120\150 FPS no problem.
  • okie i play on laptop with touch and only get about 30 - 120 ( it varies "/ ) get 12-30 ping and it works fine no need for this 200 fps nonsence but you seriously wanna waste 250 on increasing fps? "/ crazy i rather spend it on something more constructive.
  • TASTYLIME wrote: »
    This kid is so stupid. He has absolutely no clue about computer hardware.

    Dude you really need to growup and stop calling people names, when you have no clue what your talking about. Like I said this game will run fine at 40Fps. CF is more dependent on CPU then Video.... [I bet he will have something smart to say on that one too] If you have 40 FPS with a good CPU that can run the game, your fine... You can have to much FPS for this game.. This game code can cause you to lag with very high FPS... But what do I know ? Im to stupid to know anything about hardware...lmao
  • badboy051 wrote: »
    Dude you really need to growup and stop calling people names, when you have no clue what your talking about. Like I said this game will run fine at 40Fps. CF is more dependent on CPU then Video.... [I bet he will have something smart to say on that one too] If you have 40 FPS with a good CPU that can run the game, your fine... You can have to much FPS for this game.. This game code can cause you to lag with very high FPS... But what do I know ? Im to stupid to know anything about hardware...lmao
    you're to stupid to know that a human can see past 50 fps.
  • GoMavs wrote: »
    you're to stupid to know that a human can see past 50 fps.

    Pretty much anything over 30 fps is interpreted as a fluid motion...
    Any framerate over the refresh rate of your monitor is wasted
    (because it never gets displayed)... 70 fps on a monitor refreshing at 60 hz
    Keep in mind also that graphics cards are shooting for higher and higher framerates,
    so that they can sustain 30 fps under the most demanding operating conditions
    Although 30fps is "fluid", 50 fps seems to be the limit to the eye's perception.
    So if you look at a pic at 3000 FPS... did you see 3000 FPS ? Why do you think movies
    are shot at 24 to 30 FPS ?
  • badboy051 wrote: »
    Pretty much anything over 30 fps is interpreted as a fluid motion...
    Any framerate over the refresh rate of your monitor is wasted
    (because it never gets displayed)... 70 fps on a monitor refreshing at 60 hz
    Keep in mind also that graphics cards are shooting for higher and higher framerates,
    so that they can sustain 30 fps under the most demanding operating conditions
    Although 30fps is "fluid", 50 fps seems to be the limit to the eye's perception.
    So if you look at a pic at 3000 FPS... did you see 3000 FPS ? Why do you think movies
    are shot at 24 to 30 FPS ?

    You are so right bro! =DD
  • MrMe33 wrote: »
    You are so right bro! =DD
    no he isn't. there is a minimum of how much fps is needed for movies to be smooth, but there is no max to how many fps a human can see.
  • GoMavs wrote: »
    no he isn't. there is a minimum of how much fps is needed for movies to be smooth, but there is no max to how many fps a human can see.

    Oh thats so sad then =(
  • DO NOT BUY THIS CARD FOR JUST PLAYING CF. If you are playing some other games that require of GPU juice, than this card is overkill.
  • Speaking of Video Cards, I recently got an HD 5450. Yes, it's a budget card, big whoop want to fight about it?

    After installing it, I played Crossfire once! trying to play again after that has been somewhat difficult as I would get kicked out of the loading screen and a small window telling me an external program is preventing the game from functioning properly.

    I was wondering if this video card had something to do with it, because this is the first time this is happening to me. The precise name for the card is EAH5450 SILENT 512M DDR2. It's an ASUS type. Don't know if that makes a difference but when discussing this over another game that I was fortunate to play, I was told that ASUS is bad or in other words *****ty* I was wondering if this was true for any former/current ASUS users.

    I currently cannot play the game, still waiting on replies.
  • In order to play in CF do not need this kind of graphics. Poor investment
  • kan666 wrote: »
    In order to play in CF do not need this kind of graphics. Poor investment

    I don't believe he said that he was ONLY playing Crossfire. I have an arsenal of games, and Crossfire happens to be in it, but not for the time being because of technical errors.