How CF could get rid of "some" of the hacks
Comments
-
I don't quite understand you. If you mean it wont prove anything having a screenshot... you're wrong. Every hack I can think of is visible with a screenshot apart from speedhacking which doesn't exist any more. The space required to store the screenshots wouldn't be a problem, the resolution could be loads smaller and doesn't need to be stored on CF servers, you could store it on your own computer and upload it to a file hosting site.Maybe I'm missing something here cause I skimmed through the thread, but...
(if I got it right)
You have to be out of ur mind to think that some RANDOMLY generated STATIC screen shots can be of any use to bust a SIGNIFICANT fraction of the hacking user base.
Unless you allocate enough server space to those screen shots to fill the US Library Of Congress (if it was a server)
And I'm not even talking about the staff needed to REVIEW them =p
I'm sure more people would report hackers too if they had 100% proof that they hacked because you know you're actually going to get them banned, not just wasting your time. -
You don't understand lul...I don't think so.
It's hard enough to tell a hacker from a review (sometimes)
Unless the guy hacking takes a SS of himself, of course :rolleyes:
The game would auto take the screen shot and display it at the end so you can see for yourself if another player hacks. similar to the replay system but you see from their view in a screen shot
-
All right heres the deal.
We get what other versions of CF get.
Other versions don't have it, we don't get it.
Second of all, theres over 3 million CF players. Who is gonna review them? Out of the 3 million about 500,000 of them use a hack, another 2.5 million ss's are just gonna waste time.
Third of all, Performance decrease. If this will ever happen expect your FPS decrease in half.
Conculion is we don't need this, couple of x-trap updates and you get the same result.
You gotta think real before suggesting -
-
-
Most hackers don't get kicked just because of the "BR" in their name, or they have friends in the room. I get kicked more than 5 times on a good day. Does that mean I hack? No.Grzegrzolka wrote: »I've got another idea.
Player, that is kicked by other players more than 5 times in 24h for hack/illegal program gets 7 days ban for account. This would make hackers hack less or create new accounts all the time, so it makes their life a bit harder.
It would just steer me away from this game. -
WaffleMunzta wrote: »what if the person is in lobby, and the screenshot takes place. and they have hacks, but arent ingame yet... answer me this fool
Stop trolling alex. Well In-game and lobby are two different things. I specifically intended to get the point across of an "in-game" screenshot. While you pew pew. k? 
BlindEagle wrote: »All right heres the deal.
We get what other versions of CF get.
Other versions don't have it, we don't get it.
Second of all, theres over 3 million CF players. Who is gonna review them? Out of the 3 million about 500,000 of them use a hack, another 2.5 million ss's are just gonna waste time.
Third of all, Performance decrease. If this will ever happen expect your FPS decrease in half.
Conculion is we don't need this, couple of x-trap updates and you get the same result.
You gotta think real before suggesting
The replay system "most likely" lowers fps dramatically. A replay is a shadow copy of the game you we're in which updates rapidly (off of your pc). What do you think would be more effective and frames savvy? I'd say one screenshot wont hurt...Replays dwindle fps a hell of alot more.
No, YOU don't understand.
Only me can take a SS of MY computer :rolleyes:
Why would you care about a screenshot? Seems like someone needs to come out the m.p.g.h closet.
-
What would you all rather have?
A Full-Proof Screenshot System.or
A Mediocre Hard to Determine Replay System?
Also remember this you might say "Oh well aimbot can't be seen from a screenshot!"
Yes it can. Lets be honest because when someone Aimbots, The majority of the time Chams. Wallhack or Boxframe are involved. Fullproof. -
That's ridiculous, I have been kicked 10+ times in a row before...Grzegrzolka wrote: »I've got another idea.
Player, that is kicked by other players more than 5 times in 24h for hack/illegal program gets 7 days ban for account. This would make hackers hack less or create new accounts all the time, so it makes their life a bit harder.
Being kicked is bad enough but you want to add a 7 day ban on top of it? Think before you post.
Aimbotting alone is still visable, they usualy have ESP which means the players nametags show up -
good idea but i think maybe my cure for aimbot will also work, i made a thread but realy cant be bothered finding it sowwyaPimpNameOoO wrote: »What would you all rather have?
A Full-Proof Screenshot System.or
A Mediocre Hard to Determine Replay System?
Also remember this you might say "Oh well aimbot can't be seen from a screenshot!"
Yes it can. Lets be honest because when someone Aimbots, The majority of the time Chams. Wallhack or Boxframe are involved. Fullproof. -
Maybe I'm missing something here cause I skimmed through the thread, but...
(if I got it right)
You have to be out of ur mind to think that some RANDOMLY generated STATIC screen shots can be of any use to bust a SIGNIFICANT fraction of the hacking user base.
Unless you allocate enough server space to those screen shots to fill the US Library Of Congress (if it was a server)
And I'm not even talking about the staff needed to REVIEW them =p
they get deleted after 5 minutes upon first reviewing, so it allows ample time to see whether not they are hacking, and it doesn't take up too much space.
i already +1 this idea. -
Sorry I don't really have the time to read all through this atm, but I scanned through to see if it was already said.(If it was already said and I missed it.. eh w/e just call me noob.)
The biggest question here imo is how would this work? Unless it actually tells your computer to take the SS and then upload it automatically. The only thing the SS would get is a picture of the players view. Not a SS of what he has modified his PC to see.
Like when you watch the replay or are spectating, just because you are looking through there eyes doesn't mean you see there hacks. -
Why would z8 want to go threw all them screenshots?
But I like the idea.
horrible question...
Answer: because thats the point of the system so they ban the hack-er with Full Bright/Wall Hack/Chams/Boxes/Crosshair Hacks... really I thought that you were smarter. -
aPimpNameOoO wrote: »What would you all rather have?
A Full-Proof Screenshot System.or
A Mediocre Hard to Determine Replay System?
Also remember this you might say "Oh well aimbot can't be seen from a screenshot!"
Yes it can. Lets be honest because when someone Aimbots, The majority of the time Chams. Wallhack or Boxframe are involved. Fullproof.
QFTW because this is a great idea but we got a failure smilegate devs that won't add it in, so its another GREAT IDEA gone to the drain.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.1K CrossFire
- 601 CrossFire Announcements
- 603 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 164 Community
- 12 Modes
- 287 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 39 CF Competitive Forum
- CFCL
- 14 Looking for a Team?
- 550 CrossFire Support
- 64 Suggestion
- 14 CrossFire Guides
- 33 CrossFire Off Topic