You prefer...?

DenxiBanned

This is just for my own reference, mind you.

Would you prefer 1 map of 9 round halves or 2 maps of 7?

J/w.

ZOOMishere

I'd prefer one map, but that's not the 'norm' in this game I guess.

My vote is on one map though. 9 rounds.

Ghost_47

2 maps of 7.

moch_D

one map of 9.

phubez

3 maps of 5.

cryfacee

phubez wrote: »

3 maps of 5.

OMG it's JAY. I like this idea^

wolveslol

bo3

first to 32 wins

yaDiglett

5 maps, 13 rounds.

ba_dll

6 Maps, best out of 3 rounds. So if one team wins 2 rounds, the other team has to leave.

Falloutt

i think 2-3 maps (depending on if a team wins 2 straight games)

(7 rounds each half)

1 map isn't enough to show the full extent of a team, it's easy for a team to outplay a team on one map but than get their ass kicked on a different. It's only fair if a team plays on at least 2 different maps. The best way to know if a team is better is if they win on at least 2 maps.

Godsm4ck

2 maps of 7

sLOLpoke

1 of 9, until semi's or good prized quarters, best of 3 maps, still 9 rounders.

QuemQerZPalt

9 rounds so u can get to know the strats

Ghost_47

QuemQerZPalt wrote: »

9 rounds so u can get to know the strats

Yeah , but when you already lost 3 rounds..

falloutttt wrote: »

i think 2-3 maps (depending on if a team wins 2 straight games)

(7 rounds each half)

1 map isn't enough to show the full extent of a team, it's easy for a team to outplay a team on one map but than get their ass kicked on a different. It's only fair if a team plays on at least 2 different maps. The best way to know if a team is better is if they win on at least 2 maps.

Exactly ,I love you.

I wouldn't put everything on the line -in a tourney- for one map/chance -.-'

aSnipe wrote: »

1 of 9, until semi's or good prized quarters, best of 3 maps, still 9 rounders.

That makes sense.

DrixGod

2 of 7
m2sg 2 sexy

D1G1TS

1 Map of 9 rounds. I personally wouldn't enjoy switching map after map, but thats just my opinion.

im_szym3n

how about 13 maps, 1 round each?

Ghost_47

SZYMEN wrote: »

how about 13 maps, 1 round each?

There is not enough maps ;P

im_szym3n

K_Baleog wrote: »

There is not enough maps ;P

throw in a bunch of gm and td maps

ChocDrizzle

1 Map . =D

RuSTalt

Maybe to mix it up between tournaments?
Like ESL is 1 map,11 rounds.
Another tournie could be 2 maps,7 rounds etc etc.
Would make each tournament different in another way i guess.

delNSnee

2 maps of 7.

like fallout said, the full extent of a team can't be shown in one map.

a team could be extremely familiar with one map, know all the spots and correct calls. then the next map, they just get wiped out.

MyAWM

TASTYLEMONNN wrote: »

2 maps of 7.

like fallout said, the full extent of a team can't be shown in one map.

a team could be extremely familiar with one map, know all the spots and correct calls. then the next map, they just get wiped out.

the full extent of a team cannot be shown with 2 maps either

delNSnee

MyAWM wrote: »

the full extent of a team cannot be shown with 2 maps either

that depends on the team.

example5

I like 1 map, 9 rounds because then it just gets confusing for the team leaders to count every round on each map. On one map, you get one chance to prove yourself.

DenxiBanned

eX_ampLe wrote: »

I like 1 map, 9 rounds because then it just gets confusing for the team leaders to count every round on each map. On one map, you get one chance to prove yourself.

SSes do the counting job.

And it's would be round total over the 2 maps, not individual map wins.

Lumic

2 of 7

badll wrote: »

6 Maps, best out of 3 rounds. So if one team wins 2 rounds, the other team has to leave.

3 rounds = not enough

IT_Aero

2 / 7