Bigger Map with more Player

FresYes

What about a Bigger map where there's more players? instead of 8v8 maybe a 10v10 or more ^^ it be Epic for S&D or Team Death Match..

R6Ranger

thats what iwas talking about nothing more just a bigger maps and in those maps we could have 10vs10
and n maps we already have 8vs8

kwevli

ppls fps will drop...

xiKaitox

Yeah, and think of what a huge A/B-Rush that would be.

iHATEz9

8v8 is already too much and it is the only thing people play. Go play Ground War on MW2 or something.

QHaXoRQ

Wont happen , our game engine doesn't support big maps and more then 8v8 .

theHI

This isn't CS:1.6 Only the graphics are similar.

TheProphet66

kwevli wrote: »

ppls fps will drop...

I run at 75 fps on an old 9600GT that's like 3 times the human eye speed and thats will all effects on


I doubt it would hurt on the fps, however building an entire new map of a different size with new stuff than finding all the bugs etc is timely and can prove costly.

MaypleSyrup

One Word,

Lagg!

IT_Tactical

Q***oRQ wrote: »

Wont happen , our game engine doesn't support big maps and more then 8v8 .

....it's called "Scalability"...all games engines have it (EXPECIALLLY the one we're using...-_-)

What they wan't is boring, repeat-styled gameplay so they can sucker money out of people with the same damn updates...

R4MM3R

FresYes wrote: »

What about a Bigger map where there's more players? instead of 8v8 maybe a 10v10 or more ^^ it be Epic for S&D or Team Death Match..

to bad wont happen

aPimpNameKirby

fresyes wrote: »

what about a bigger map where there's more players? Instead of 8v8 maybe a 10v10 or more ^^ it be epic for s&d or team death match..

yay a lag map!

jillzwut

TheProphet66 wrote: »

I run at 75 fps on an old 9600GT that's like 3 times the human eye speed and thats will all effects on


I doubt it would hurt on the fps, however building an entire new map of a different size with new stuff than finding all the bugs etc is timely and can prove costly.

Even though the human eye sees at 60 FPS, but okay... dumbass.

ChocDrizzle

Too laggy.
D=

newbzilla

FresYes wrote: »

What about a Bigger map where there's more players? instead of 8v8 maybe a 10v10 or more ^^ it be Epic for S&D or Team Death Match..

not so much snd but tdm egypt 12 min 12v12 = best game of the year O_O

Star15332

so you wanna see laggers lag even more?

SuperMunzta

Star15332 wrote: »

so you wanna see laggers lag even more?

naw too much fps lag man

AAc1d

NOO...
bad idea

maplestoryyy

that will be hard if u were playing 20 people in FREE FOR ALL

warth0g

Play MAG if you want big maps with many players... Wouldn't fit in CF.

SAULLL

100 vs 100 ppl.

yay

KoreyBee

No no no no no no no no
Hell Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
8 vs 8 is enough

tightful

super battle should be nice,
100vs100, armys instead of teams.

tooI

this bug-engine sometimes cant even take 6vs6. such a shame really.

sn1peyou

Oh.. my.. fking... FDSGDFG. I get 11 fps in an 8v8(suck it). The only way it's playable is a 4v4 or no more than a 5v5. Until I get another computer, but more on the point, if this game fail regs at a 5v5 game what makes you think it's going to be good at double or triple the max players?

dragoneye73

I'm all for bigger maps , farcry2 had large maps, the game play was a lot better. I don't think a lot of the older pc's could handle it , so yea the lag would suck and we would just have more to b!tch about

jujujustinsy

well i think of crossifire has a 100 vs 100 game, which crossfire will have to buy a whole new system for it, it will definetly get people's attention. plus it hink fps only affects those you see. you won't be able to see all 200 players. and people have the choice to play or not. there is a lot of hard core gamers with epic pc specs out there. you can fill like 12 100 vs 100 games. that's 2400 players. and you can also have an ping test and make ping restrictions. like one room can only have ping of 1-50 no more no less to keep everybody at the same level.

oh and to make this more interesting, players can leave anytime they want and still get exp and gp. like it's continous forever. it's like a battlefield. it's like TD but it never ends.

kiK0N

2billion vs 2billion
/threadclosed

Antaria_Luke

Just because SOME of you have low fps doesnt mean EVERYBODY has.
I like the idea. Especially if you consider that on most FPS there are servers with 16 - 24 - 36 - 44 players.

theHI

Excludable wrote: »

100 vs 100 ppl.

yay

This .

SideEff3cts

19 Brs in the same room as me..

Nty

15 is enough.