What rank do you consider to be "not noob"
I stopped playing a couple months ago but ive been active for a week or two now, back then i would consider sfc to be quiet high, but now i dont look at it like that. Not that i judge people on ranks but at first glance what do you see to be a high rank. For me its master sgt but only just.
So what do you consider to be "good rank".
PS: im 8k xp of Lt.
So what do you consider to be "good rank".
PS: im 8k xp of Lt.
Comments
-
-
slower than Lieutenent, i will check if he got the K/D ratio too high, especially in Ghost Mode
higher than Lieutenet, don't give a damn, usually you will judge people through their rank first
some stupid high ranks when they lose me they call me hack, and of course some idiots believe it, because they believe in HIGH RANKS more than SLOW RANKs -
Mohammedaa wrote: »Look at their scrim stats, thats how you can tell if there an overall good player and not just a pubestar.
lol i always think of that name too when i look at clan pages.
anyway good call, a repsectable rank is gold bar of course. it takes a while to get it.
some of them get their accounts ha.cked and then hac.ker tries to get them banned using auto aims, chams ect. all farming and maturity aside getting gold bar legit is respectable and shows they have passion for the game. -
Mohammedaa wrote: »Look at their scrim stats, thats how you can tell if there an overall good player and not just a pubestar.
I disagree, because to be honest I used to scrim when I was really bad and now my clan KDR is messed up, and now I'm usually positive in scrims so yeah, I just say judge the player, after you see them play. -
Rank dont mean jack im 1st lt but im ok joined server played against 2nd lts to have good game went 6-0 and the 2nd lts shouted hack, farming idiot noobs, so obviously they cryed,and yup u guessed it you have been kicked lmfao.thats why i hardly ever play this chit game now the noobs cant tell the difference between hacks and skill.Nothing personal but most of the cf players havn't got a clue so they hack,and most are still crap.i use to love this game and play regular but now ive reached 1st lt ive had enough, if gg stoped the noobs this game would be ok but thats never gona happen.So rank means nothing simple ive played against captains and higher and they were garbage.Some players will always be NOOB regardlees of rank.........
-
-
RadiantFire wrote: »I don't look at the "rank" to judge them as noob or pro
I look at their profile for KDR and the ratio of their kills with head shot kills.
lol even the profile where you have the K/D etc. does not mean big things if you consider it the way you see things.
A hacker`s profile will be a great one with even a low rank. same will it be for farmers, but with a high rank . -
NZkillingNZ wrote: »I stopped playing a couple months ago but ive been active for a week or two now, back then i would consider sfc to be quiet high, but now i dont look at it like that. Not that i judge people on ranks but at first glance what do you see to be a high rank. For me its master sgt but only just.
So what do you consider to be "good rank".
PS: im 8k xp of Lt.
doesnt matter because i had mroe then 1 account and i played as pfc and had 35 kills in gm
it just matters if ur good -
I think every one has farmed at least once!
Check my profile and the K/D and you will get a proof of what I am saying .
May be I am the ONLY one with a 2nd LT rank with a negative K/D . So if I would have farmed or hack ,how would it have been negative ? :rolleyes:
So you see , you should never put all the eggs in the same basket
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 736 CrossFire Announcements
- 730 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 333 Community
- 12 Modes
- 397 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 89 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 17 Looking for a Team?
- 530 CrossFire Support
- 8 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 38 CrossFire Off Topic