Before you play deVote.

2»

Comments

  • Second one looks as though he unscopes and immediately sees an enemy run past the window in which he tries to quickscope?
  • Luxury wrote: »
    Second one looks as though he unscopes and immediately sees an enemy run past the window in which he tries to quickscope?

    Well think about it like this, if you're walling you cannot see the players through the wall while scoped. So he un-scoped to see where the player was, and realized he was closer than he thought and he scoped right back in right before the player peeked. Which the player never peeked until he rescoped right before he peeked. If you have never cheated in a game with walls you probably wouldn't understand that.
  • RHlNO wrote: »
    Well think about it like this, if you're walling you cannot see the players through the wall while scoped. So he un-scoped to see where the player was, and realized he was closer than he thought and he scoped right back in right before the player peeked. Which the player never peeked until he rescoped right before he peeked. If you have never cheated in a game with walls you probably wouldn't understand that.
    Didn't know a hack doesn't work while scoped. My input in now void lol.
  • Luxury wrote: »
    Didn't know a hack doesn't work while scoped. My input in now void lol.

    Yeah, it's whatever though. It's CF.
  • There's literally hundreds of ways to get a kill through smoke, especially with an awp. First of all it's a replay, so the smoke probably looked nothing like that and knowing you you probably had the smoke bloom a few times to make it seem illegitimate. Regardless, he could be on 16bit color, the smoke could have split, he could have smoke goggles, he could have weird monitor settings, he could have seen a muzzle or a nade, the smoke might not have bloomed yet, or, the most likely, it could have just been luck. But then again, he could be cheating. He'd have to be really bad to only get two semi-decent shots while walling.

    Regarding the second shot, it wasn't some blatant-wall-hack-uber-pro-quickscope-awp-kill. It was a below average shot in general, with some awkward scope timing. His story that he scoped out once his teammate left barn so he could see more is highly believable, and thr right decision to make. He gave himself FAR more room and time to react than a top tier player would need, let alone a cheater, seeing as his scope was placed as far to the right as possible. It also wasn't even placed at the correct aim level, but I guess that's probably irrelevant. It wasn't even a quick scope, if you can see him scoping in on a damn replay, odds are it was an even slower scope-in time in game.

    Like I said, neither one of these videos is anywhere nea being a bust.
  • oLOGIC wrote: »
    There's literally hundreds of ways to get a kill through smoke, especially with an awp. First of all it's a replay, so the smoke probably looked nothing like that and knowing you you probably had the smoke bloom a few times to make it seem illegitimate. Regardless, he could be on 16bit color, the smoke could have split, he could have smoke goggles, he could have weird monitor settings, he could have seen a muzzle or a nade, the smoke might not have bloomed yet, or, the most likely, it could have just been luck. But then again, he could be cheating. He'd have to be really bad to only get two semi-decent shots while walling.

    Regarding the second shot, it wasn't some blatant-wall-hack-uber-pro-quickscope-awp-kill. It was a below average shot in general, with some awkward scope timing. His story that he scoped out once his teammate left barn so he could see more is highly believable, and thr right decision to make. He gave himself FAR more room and time to react than a top tier player would need, let alone a cheater, seeing as his scope was placed as far to the right as possible. It also wasn't even placed at the correct aim level, but I guess that's probably irrelevant. It wasn't even a quick scope, if you can see him scoping in on a damn replay, odds are it was an even slower scope-in time in game.

    Like I said, neither one of these videos is anywhere nea being a bust.

    Thank you for putting thought into your answers, and no. I did not tamper with the replay as that is how it showed for me. Thanks, Logic.
  • RHlNO wrote: »
    Thank you for actually making a good post instead of flaming me for my opinion. I have taken your opinion and though about it, but his teammate already rotated and there was no way that he could of heard him from that far away (his teammate).

    there are headphones that work magic xD
  • ThePurv wrote: »
    I believed toonie fake bust more than this.

    I'll take that as a compliment.

    @Rhino, you might not have tampered it but let's say you fast foward to a certain point in that round the replay itself would have already been altered. When I sometimes edit videos I have smokes in my face from a couple rounds ago that I have to get rid of.
  • RHlNO wrote: »
    Well think about it like this, if you're walling you cannot see the players through the wall while scoped. So he un-scoped to see where the player was, and realized he was closer than he thought and he scoped right back in right before the player peeked. Which the player never peeked until he rescoped right before he peeked. If you have never cheated in a game with walls you probably wouldn't understand that.

    Is it difficult for you to blink on a daily bases?
    HEADsucks wrote: »
    I'll take that as a compliment.

    @Rhino, you might not have tampered it but let's say you fast foward to a certain point in that round the replay itself would have already been altered. When I sometimes edit videos I have smokes in my face from a couple rounds ago that I have to get rid of.

    You're most welcome. Had me fooled.
  • Luxury wrote: »
    Didn't know a hack doesn't work while scoped. My input in now void lol.

    It does work while scoped but you can barely see anything because you're scoped lol. If you're unscoped you see much more wall coverage.
  • HEADsucks wrote: »
    It does work while scoped but you can barely see anything because you're scoped lol. If you're unscoped you see much more wall coverage.

    That is the reasoning of my theory why he unscoped.
  • It would be easier to tell if you just posted the whole replay so we could watch his decision making/etc. One shot or one decision doesn't mean he's cheating, especially since both shots are easily doable for a legit player.

    He's most likely cheating, but your evidence can't convince me
  • RHlNO wrote: »
    That is the reasoning of my theory why he unscoped.

    Unscoping at angles like that is fairly common.
  • Unscoping at angles like that is fairly common.

    Yea common for cheaters. Coming from a cheater. Who got busted and claims he wasn't cheating.



    I know nothing....... duhhhh #wizdumb
This discussion has been closed.