A item suggestion

Chien_1Q

I call it "Anti-Armor", and its basically in its name.


It shoots people like they have no armor once equipped. It's an item in Item shop and i think it should be 20k a-week.


The item appears on the screen while playing so people don't abuse it in Go4 (in European version Armor is allowed in Go4, I don't know about NESL).

I think it's a good item for profit because of "free armor" from achievements.

M4A1_Patriot

+1 Good.

Urkel2005

So you're suggesting an item that would make armor handed out for achievements and events pointless?
I don't think I need to point out how flawed that logic is...

Armor is there for a reason. I can totally understand you dislike it, but it is there and most of it is obtained through money (coupons or ZP). Accordingly, it's a source of income for the publisher (Z8games) and the devs (Smilegate) of the game. They would be mad if they introduced an item that basically cheats on all those who exchange their ZP or coupons for armor...

best regards,
Urkel

DextenAL

Urkel2005 wrote: »

So you're suggesting an item that would make armor handed out for achievements and events pointless?
I don't think I need to point out how flawed that logic is...

What about flash bang vs anti flash goggle things?

Think it is actually a good idea +1

Commissioner Gordon wrote:

We start carrying semi-automatics, they buy automatics. We start wearing Kevlar, they buy armor piercing rounds.

Plus, it will be a lot less cost effective then Armour. You buy Armour and it works against every player. You buy Armour piercing rounds which only has an effect against people wearing Armour.. which isn't the majority I am guessing, so you'll be wasting money against every day users.

Urkel2005

DextenAL wrote: »

What about flash bang vs anti flash goggle things?

There are some differences:
1. Most people get their Flash Guard as a byproduct of opening GP crates, so they don't actually buy it, much unlike the case of Armor.
2. The Flash Guard only reduces the effect of Flashbangs by reducing the time you're blinded, it doesn't make you immune to their effect.

The suggestion at hand, however, totally negates any benefit that armor is supposed to offer. You might as well remove armor from the game instead of introducing such a counter-item (which, luckily, will not happen).

I perfectly understand you guys want to play according to certain rules and are both desperately anxious and rageous about people breaking them or just giving you a hard time killing them.

However, you have absolutely no right to force other people into your standards of gameplay.

If you guys look down upon armor and refrain from using it, that is perfectly fine. However, don't try to impose the limitations you made to yourselves upon others. There is absolutely nothing that would ever justify that. No envy, no "skill", nothing.

best regards,
Urkel

DextenAL

Urkel2005 wrote: »

I perfectly understand you guys want to play according to certain rules and are both desperately anxious and rageous about people breaking them or just giving you a hard time killing them.

Desperately anxious and rageous? haha.. Just thought it was a good idea lol

iZeroChan

So you want armor piercing rounds.

How about no..

CFGu

I personally like the idea, but they would never put in something in which defeats the purpose of a ZP item.

SERAPH1C

CFGu wrote: »

I personally like the idea, but they would never put in something in which defeats the purpose of a ZP item.

I miss you

ChumY

Sounds nice.

[dot]

It's 42 000 GP and named AK-47..?

Might just be powerful enough to smack through head armor and HP, but not necessarily be ignoring armor altogether though.
Someone test.

Urkel2005

DextenAL wrote: »

Desperately anxious and rageous? haha.. Just thought it was a good idea lol

I wasn't referring to you in particular; it's just that judging from some posts you see about this topic here, one can conclude that some people are very... passionate about their anti-armor attitude. Hence my post.

best regards,
Urkel

R4M8ON3R

bad idea. bad concept, bad pricing,

20k gp or zp is TOOMUCH, think about it 90% of people who wear armor can afford it, (coupons,zp..etc) people who have it from badges or achievements and that dont put money in game or so on can't really afford even 20k gp for that item since they much rather keep that 20 000 to eventually buy a gun or try lucks on crates, so by implementing this idea into our game you make it so whoever has armor for long term may have a massive advantage against who can't.. i think VIP weapons already cause enough trouble for newbies and gp only player so yeah, let it be as is..

-1

googlett

Or allow it to make a room that u cant use armor. It would be like you cant play if you are wearing armor.
___________

IGN: G0LDENB00TY
DO YOU HAVE THE GOLDEN BOOTY!?!

Daniel_25

[MOD]dot wrote: »

It's 42 000 GP and named AK-47..?

Might just be powerful enough to smack through head armor and HP, but not necessarily be ignoring armor altogether though.
Someone test.

ak long range 90s

2RAGE2

its not A item its AN item