Charlie Hedbo Terrorist Attack ( France )

http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/jan/07/shooting-paris-satirical-magazine-charlie-hebdo


Because this satirical magazine draw some pictures of the prophet, islamists of Daesch killed 12 ppls.

What do you think of this ?

#jesuischarlie

Comments

  • C'est vraiment triste. Ces terroristes donnent une tres mauvaise impression de l'Islam.

    The world should expect these sorts of attacks as Muslim extremists become more and more numerous. It is important to note that these people do not represent the Islam religion, and that millions of muslims around the world denounce these types of violent actions.

    Pray for them, the dead, and their families.

    I'm also worried this will make France an even more religiously intolerant/deserted country. "In the face of so much hate, you can only respond with greater love".
  • seafrog wrote: »
    I'm also worried this will make France an even more religiously intolerant/deserted country. "In the face of so much hate, you can only respond with greater love".

    French citizens didn't make the difference between Islam and this kind of terrosrist. I was reading status on Facebook of my friend and some of them started to injure the muslim religion..

    After this terrorist attack, a lot of French want to send "arabs" to their respective country, the racism is growing very fast.
    Also, the extreme right political movement ( Front National ) get more than 25% of the votes cast at the last elections in 2014.

    I think we will get soon a revolution in France, no work, economical crisis, racism growing etc.. None of this is a good sign for us
  • Damiienn wrote: »
    I think we will get soon a revolution in France, no work, economical crisis, racism growing etc.. None of this is a good sign for us

    Current government doesn't help either, hopefully it won't go that far, but yeah, I was pretty shocked when I saw that his afternoon.
  • seafrog wrote: »
    It is important to note that these people do not represent the Islam religion

    I would argue that this is open for interpretation partly because the hadith and quran can be interpreted in various ways and hence you have different groups and sects. You have to consider that various interpretations subjugate various peoples under different laws based on whether or not they are muslim. In turn, treatment towards them is based on the interpretation of whether they are considered people or not. whether or not this is what the prophet had intended is also under questioning if you relate his actions to the texts recorded and to the various interpretations held by different groups. some can argue that the actions of extremist are warranted and justifiable through these interpretations, and generalizing that the majority of the people do not accept this is kind of dangerous when you consider that most terrorist come from the largest sect in islam and often are not protested against (as seen in the tribes of iraq). western interpretation of this religion is far from reality and is often sugar coated by the media in fear and to be politically correct, because if otherwise is done, it is clear as seen in yesterdays event, what could very well happen to anyone.
  • Mais pourquoi êtes vous, vous l'aisser m'anipuler par les médias! Mon dieu!
    J'ai honte pour vous !
  • I would argue that this is open for interpretation partly because the hadith and quran can be interpreted in various ways and hence you have different groups and sects. You have to consider that various interpretations subjugate various peoples under different laws based on whether or not they are muslim. In turn, treatment towards them is based on the interpretation of whether they are considered people or not. whether or not this is what the prophet had intended is also under questioning if you relate his actions to the texts recorded and to the various interpretations held by different groups. some can argue that the actions of extremist are warranted and justifiable through these interpretations, and generalizing that the majority of the people do not accept this is kind of dangerous when you consider that most terrorist come from the largest sect in islam and often are not protested against (as seen in the tribes of iraq). western interpretation of this religion is far from reality and is often sugar coated by the media in fear and to be politically correct, because if otherwise is done, it is clear as seen in yesterdays event, what could very well happen to anyone.

    Very well said, and I agree that Islam is already in trouble given that it's main text, the quran, has different versions. At the time these versions came out, there still wasn't a central authority figure in the Islamic world. People and tribes were allowed to pick and choose what they would believe based on their upbringing and personal standards.

    None of their actions are justifiable though. Even if you were to believe that the "true" quran says that apartheid and conversion by the sword are the correct ways to live, HUMAN REASON (which every person not afflicted by a mental illness is born with) dictates that if YOU, as a human, deserve to live, then so does any other human.

    You are right to say that this should have been expected, as the Charlie Hebdo magazine had been threatened numerous times in the past. The killers have been killed now, but I wish they had been caught alive. To help eradicate these extreme ideas, we need to learn how they think, at what point they began to think that way, and what tools of education were used to persuade them of this. This is a psychological and social distortion.