Power of LT´s to kik member....

fail_a_lot

the support told me that i suggest it here...

to the story...

2 days ago a guy gets the login information of an LT account from our clan.
and he was able to kik all (80!) members at once...

in the old system LT´s are only allowed to kik 5 members per day. now its unlimited. thats too much power for an LT.
please change it back to the old rules...

and the support are not able to help me / change this for the security of all clans...











how i told. that is definitv too much power for LT´s and can destroy a 100 member clan...

aWmgasm

80 seems excessive, but I think 10 should be fine. You obviously need to reevaluate who you want as LTs... Definitely shouldn't be people who share accounts.

fail_a_lot

aWmgasm wrote: »

80 seems excessive, but I think 10 should be fine. You obviously need to reevaluate who you want as LTs... Definitely shouldn't be people who share accounts.

thx for your agree.
accounts can be scammed too... (nadebots/freezb websites/keyloggers...)

Creative_E

"It is because of players like you that make us enjoy what we do" :rolleyes:



I never knew that we had a new rules (limits) as LT's

aWmgasm

fail_a_lot wrote: »

thx for your agree.
accounts can be scammed too... (nadebots/freezb websites/keyloggers...)

Accounts cant just magically be scammed. Your LT was unfortunately dumb enough to do what you listed.

He probably tried to hack, got keylogged. Either way, you still need to choose better LTs, not people who are dumb enough to get their accounts scammed, keylogged or just share accounts.

[dot]

5 sounds like a decent level, I'm sure it was just overlooked (or not possible to implement) in the transfer.

Letting people who aren't reliable be lieutenants is also a problem, someone who falls for keyloggers or scamsites shouldn't have such a position.
Hard to know in advance of course, so the only one to blame is him.

Werdna88

That's unsettling.

Totally needs to be a cap on that. As stated we need to trust who we put into the lt positions... But dang

Brb denoting half my lts .. oh wait I can't get in the game >.<

komperativ

[MOD]Andrew wrote: »

That's unsettling.

Totally needs to be a cap on that. As stated we need to trust who we put into the lt positions... But dang

Brb denoting half my lts .. oh wait I can't get in the game >.<

I've a question :V what's a permenantly blocked clan's leader situation ?

i mean how the leaderity can be switched to another member ?

Jlu4HocTb

There is no need for any caps... an LT is 2nd in command....


They have added many other "LT like" options. So you can give other people the power to add or remove people from clan.

There is the secretary that can accept or kick, but not sure if those other options are able to also kick an unlimited amount of people.

The LT should stay as is, but the rest should have a cap...

My 2 cents.

If you want to try some one out for LT make them a secretary for a while 1st

Werdna88

komperativ wrote: »

I've a question :V what's a permenantly blocked clan's leader situation ?

i mean how the leaderity can be switched to another member ?

I think in the clan guide they state after a certain amount of inactivity the master position will be passed on to a lt.

AmHopeless

[MOD]Andrew wrote: »

I think in the clan guide they state after a certain amount of inactivity the master position will be passed on to a lt.

Yea but the Lt must send a ticket into support as well asking for it to be transferred