Post all your Screenshots / Winnings here!
Comments
-
Ohhh I see...
Kukri RD is rare, shall I too start to brag now?
Not really rare. I see at least 10 times a day. And GK is different from the other permanent ZP weapons.. The katana was earned through a tournament where the winning team had to use skill in order to obtain it. However with the other melee weapons it was simple a matter of spending as much money as possible. -
Oww sorry my fault.
http://i45.tinypic.com/ku89i.jpg
Oh wait, I could brag with the M4CC which I got 1 year before it came out...
I don't really care, you can go ahead and waste all the money you want on this game. I on the other hand will only spend a little bit here and there.lol Zero I can show you if you want that the knife beats the katana.
In your opinion it may be, but in my opinion the katana is better than the knife. -
-
U have to forgive Zero, he doesn't have anything to show off except gold kat xD
Don't get mad at me bro, cause it's true
Maybe that's because I don't care about showing off..? If I did I'd sink a lot more money into this game. I pretty much go for weapons that I'll use, and only weapons that I'll use. -
Contradiction...
Not really a contradiction, I only post that when someone calls me a hacker. That's not showing off at all.That is Zero being Zero.
He applies his own definitions to things.
Just VATAV being VATAV, making false assumptions. -
RequiemZero wrote: »Not really a contradiction, I only post that when someone calls me a hacker. That's not showing off at all.
Just VATAV being VATAV, making false assumptions.
Your using "assumptions" when you mean "statements".
Thus you self-demonstrated what I said in your counter statement, which also disproves mine being false. -
Your using "assumptions" when you mean "statements".
Thus you self-demonstrated what I said in your counter statement, which also disproves mine being false.
You assume that I would rather apply my own meaning to things than use the actual meaning, hence you prove my right once again. Now will I need to say this multiple times before you actually understand it like before?
And why is it I can get along with Gods just fine, but whenever you enter the picture you always seem to have to find a way to try to get at me. -
RequiemZero wrote: »You assume that I would rather apply my own meaning to things than use the actual meaning, hence you prove my right once again. Now will I need to say this multiple times before you actually understand it like before?
And why is it I can get along with Gods just fine, but whenever you enter the picture you always seem to have to find a way to try to get at me.
To assume is to declare without proof or evidence.
You posted proof against yourself in your last post and the one before that, thus what I said wasn't a assumption because there is proof of it.
You keep using the words "assume" and "assumption" incorrectly.
This is proof alone that you aren't using their standard definitions.
So if your not using their standard definition, then my statement "He applies his own definitions to things." is true because you ARE applying your own definition.
You keep saying I "assume things" when all I'm doing is stating arguments based on what you say and show. To assume would be to simply say things without basing it on anything.
Edit: And "Prove me right once again"?
Last time we debated, 3 mods and over a dozen other people declared you were incorrect, not one person agreed with your viewpoint. So when were you right? Or are you talking about debates with everyone in general and not just me? -
To assume is to declare without proof or evidence.
You posted proof against yourself in your last post and the one before that, thus what I said wasn't a assumption because there is proof of it.
You keep using the words "assume" and "assumption" incorrectly.
This is proof alone that you aren't using their standard definitions.
So if your not using their standard definition, then my statement "He applies his own definitions to things." is true because you ARE applying your own definition.
You keep saying I "assume things" when all I'm doing is stating arguments based on what you say and show. To assume would be to simply say things without basing it on anything.
Edit: And "Prove me right once again"?
Last time we debated, 3 mods and over a dozen other people declared you were incorrect, not one person agreed with your viewpoint. So when were you right? Or are you talking about debates with everyone in general and not just me?
On second though nevermind, I'm not going to pointlessly argue with someone of such condescending arrogance. Even though you'll call this a victory, which by all means if it helps you sleep at night do, I just don't feel like spending all day explaining the same thing to you ten times over again before you seem to understand. -
ChickenBoss wrote: »
Was playing the whole morning with it. Now breaking my spas-12. Spas is actually decent in gm, got some good scores with it. 2304 gp to repair, so it's broken soon.
Good 'ole Type-89. That's on my list of weapons to buy eventually. -
RequiemZero wrote: »Once again your logic fails to have any real basis. I do not use the terms incorrectly, because you have no real proof of any of your claims. I do not contradict what I say, nor does what I say prove you or anything you've claimed to be correct. To think so is simply ignorant. I don't apply my own definitions, I go by the real definitions. You lack and substantial proof to back your claims therefor they're categorized as assumptions, nothing more.
And you and I know full well that you only had more backing because you're better liked throughout the community than I am. I do not kiss up to the MODs or any of the other people in the community. I simply state what I see, how I see it.
You make the claim "My logic fails".
I quoted the proof that is from your posts and explained it. Also, you're basing whether or not you use terms incorrectly based on if I have prove to support my claims?RequiemZero wrote: »I do not use terms incorrectly, because you have no real proof of any of your claims
My claims do NOT factor into whether you're using terms correctly or incorrectly, they are two separate issues.
I never said anything about contradictions, don't change the subject.RequiemZero wrote: »I do not contradict what I say, nor does what I say prove you or anything you've claimed to be correct.
My claims are based on what you do, that means all proof I show in essence is going to have to come from what you say or do.
Then explain the definitions you are going by. If you are using the real definitions then you are simply miss using them and my statement of you using different ones is disproven.RequiemZero wrote: »I don't apply my own definitions, I go by the real definitions.
I already quoted you miss using words. Either your not recognizing you are using them incorrectly or you are applying a different definition to them.RequiemZero wrote: »You lack and substantial proof to back your claims therefor they're categorized as assumptions, nothing more.
You are making a claim with out any posting any evidence. You demanding I post evidence (Which I already have) when you won't even bother doing the same? This is a double standard, a form of contradiction.RequiemZero wrote: »And you and I know full well that you only had more backing because you're better liked throughout the community than I am. I do not kiss up to the MODs or any of the other people in the community.
Reread this sentence a few times. It is admitting your using your view exclusively and no one elses.RequiemZero wrote: »I simply state what I see, how I see it. -
-
RequiemZero wrote: »On second though nevermind, I'm not going to pointlessly argue with someone of such condescending arrogance. Even though you'll call this a victory, which by all means if it helps you sleep at night do, I just don't feel like spending all day explaining the same thing to you ten times over again before you seem to understand.
condescending?
I'm talking to you as a equal.
I'm still waiting for you to actually explain your argument rather then just insult and change the subject. -
-
-
-
Why I do it? It great extra credit for my composition class. Why Zero does it? You would have to ask him.
Helping your classes through arguments with Zero? VATAV you silly goose.. (:
I request you both drop it now and go either in-game or PMs/VMs about it.
< Spent tons of GP morning of patch.. <..< 
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2K CrossFire
- 590 CrossFire Announcements
- 592 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 160 Community
- 12 Modes
- 280 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 38 CF Competitive Forum
- CFCL
- 14 Looking for a Team?
- 542 CrossFire Support
- 64 Suggestion
- 12 CrossFire Guides
- 33 CrossFire Off Topic