So whats going on?

iiMaGiK

Can we have an official statement by saidin or juice, im tired of listening to these mods who blatantly favorite ace.

only 3 options I see is.
-ban malte and roth
-unban carbon because if you think about it both didnt have concrete proof off them actually ghosting, it was just someone admitting it. So why just punish one team?
-Or whats gonna happen because its fawking crossfire is malte and roth get a warning and nothing happens.

THANKS

Edit: please if you are an esg admin and thinking about posting don't.

ryokashoot

Why would you ban someone without legit proof?

iiMaGiK

ryokashoot wrote: »

Why would you ban someone without legit proof?

i guess carbons was legit proof.
Because you know we actually heard david ghost for carbon.

ryokashoot

iiMaGiK wrote: »

i guess carbons was legit proof.
Because you know we actually heard david ghost for carbon.

But you heard him admitting to it.

Unless Roth, malte or ice admit to it, no one can do anything about it.

[MOD]Zzxq

Without more evidence nothing can be proven, only assumed. To condemn someone right now we would have to assume one side is completely lying, while that may or may not be true, its still not a valid way of deciding if they are guilty.

iiMaGiK

ryokashoot wrote: »

But you heard him admitting to it.

Unless Roth, malte or ice admit to it, no one can do anything about it.

you heard sketch admit 2 it.

ryokashoot

iiMaGiK wrote: »

you heard sketch admit 2 it.

So if you have a job and you get fired because an employee told your boss you were slacking (when you know you weren't) BUT he said you were...


Would it be justifiable?
No, because that person did not have evidence.

h0nesttt

ryokashoot wrote: »

So if you have a job and you get fired because an employee told your boss you were slacking (when you know you weren't) BUT he said you were...


Would it be justifiable?
No, because that person did not have evidence.

he doesn't have a job so i don't see how that makes any sense

iiMaGiK

h0nesttt wrote: »

he doesn't have a job so i don't see how that makes any sense

tyyy h0nest ;]

Daniel_25

h0nesttt wrote: »

he doesn't have a job so i don't see how that makes any sense

it's an analogy

zedw0w

iiMaGiK wrote: »

Can we have an official statement by saidin or juice, im tired of listening to these mods who blatantly favorite ace.

only 3 options I see is.
-ban malte and roth
-unban carbon because if you think about it both didnt have concrete proof off them actually ghosting, it was just someone admitting it. So why just punish one team?
-Or whats gonna happen because its fawking crossfire is malte and roth get a warning and nothing happens.

THANKS

Edit: please if you are an esg admin and thinking about posting don't.

my final statement is


BAN ALL OF ACE GAMING!

ThePurv

I ghosted for Prime a few months ago. Can we ban all of them?

[MOD]Zzxq

thepurv wrote: »

i ghosted for prime a few months ago. Can we ban all of them?

shut up =d

ThePurv

Zzxq wrote: »

shut up =d

I said it so it must be true.

doop51

ThePurv wrote: »

I ghosted for Prime a few months ago. Can we ban all of them?

you get a ban too



thank goodness, we can get rid of both sets of garbage

AprilHotNess

zedw0w wrote: »

my final statement is


BAN ALL OF ACE GAMING!

ban all of them and give juice his wogl jersey that he hasn't received yet

michealdrkk

AprilHotNess wrote: »

ban all of them and give juice his wogl jersey that he hasn't received yet

go to sleep

iiMaGiK

man i put the pu55y on the chainwax.

djfiusdhfiuh

someone tell erick to talk to sketch via mumble and interrogate him and polleus ur a idiot, you can't just say carbon admitted to ghosting because they didn't not one word is left out of any of the carbon members mouths saying we ghosted, as for david ARE U LIKE DUMB? UNKNOWINGLY ADMITTING HE GHOSTED FOR CARBON? well shjt purvis come on mumble let me "unknowingly" record you saying you ghosted for prime I'm sure that works, well then how would you decide whether it was unknowingly or knowingly how do decide because carbon didn't say anything after the incident happened. You literally have to have solid proof.

as for "you better not be on the phone with andrej" well what does that mean? maybe there just saying hi to each other that is not clear enough that they were ghosting.

imERICK

djfiusdhfiuh wrote: »

someone tell erick to talk to sketch via mumble and interrogate him and polleus ur a idiot, you can't just say carbon admitted to ghosting because they didn't not one word is left out of any of the carbon members mouths saying we ghosted, as for david ARE U LIKE DUMB? UNKNOWINGLY ADMITTING HE GHOSTED FOR CARBON? well shjt purvis come on mumble let me "unknowingly" record you saying you ghosted for prime I'm sure that works, well then how would you decide whether it was unknowingly or knowingly how do decide because carbon didn't say anything after the incident happened. You literally have to have solid proof.

as for "you better not be on the phone with andrej" well what does that mean? maybe there just saying hi to each other that is not clear enough that they were ghosting.

There was a lot more proof with the david/carbon scandal. Polleus is right, chat logs can be faked, and even though this chat log isn't fake(And sketch admitted it), there isn't enough proof until the other 2 players decide they want to come out and tell the truth.


Lol @ interrogate sketch.

xElijahx

iiMaGiK wrote: »

Can we have an official statement by saidin .

mfw have saidin not favor ace gaming




all seems a little SKETCHY




ha

mykLss

Zzxq wrote: »

shut up =d

only reason we beat the great undaunted

ip4me

ryokashoot wrote: »

But you heard him admitting to it.

Unless Roth, malte or ice admit to it, no one can do anything about it.

So if iI claim that I ghosted for ACE Gaming(which I didnt) then ill get banned and so will they?

BarneyF1fe

All I have to say is,,,,,,,,, AHHHahahahahahahahahaha!

bertman_1g

gonna drop kick these two goons

ESG_Mike

iiMaGiK wrote: »

Can we have an official statement by saidin or juice, im tired of listening to these mods who blatantly favorite ace.

only 3 options I see is.
-ban malte and roth
-unban carbon because if you think about it both didnt have concrete proof off them actually ghosting, it was just someone admitting it. So why just punish one team?
-Or whats gonna happen because its fawking crossfire is malte and roth get a warning and nothing happens.

THANKS

Edit: please if you are an esg admin and thinking about posting don't.

Please stop making threads about it then. Saidin can choose to ban a player from CrossFire, but he does not choose if they are banned from ESG. And without concrete evidence, they are not going to be banned. It's not a matter of favoring ace, because I don't even know anyone on that team. Here's your last warning though, make one more post about this issue and you will get a lifetime ban from ESG. We don't want toxic players in our community, and that's all you are.

[MOD]Polleus

djfiusdhfiuh wrote: »

someone tell erick to talk to sketch via mumble and interrogate him and polleus ur a idiot, you can't just say carbon admitted to ghosting because they didn't not one word is left out of any of the carbon members mouths saying we ghosted, as for david ARE U LIKE DUMB? UNKNOWINGLY ADMITTING HE GHOSTED FOR CARBON? well shjt purvis come on mumble let me "unknowingly" record you saying you ghosted for prime I'm sure that works, well then how would you decide whether it was unknowingly or knowingly how do decide because carbon didn't say anything after the incident happened. You literally have to have solid proof.

as for "you better not be on the phone with andrej" well what does that mean? maybe there just saying hi to each other that is not clear enough that they were ghosting.

He admitted that he accepted money to ghost. Did you even listen to the recording? It was basically like a wire tap on a phone. David didn't know mateusz was there, so there was no reason for him to say anything untruthful. There was solid proof. Add to the fact that after David knew he was caught, he came out and admitted it himself before we made a post about it. Can't get any more clear cut than that.

Now you've got two ex-teammates (one who said there was ghosting and one who said there wasn't ghosting). At this point, that's not solid proof for either side. Even with chat logs. Just being rational. Chill out.

"I was on the team. They ghosted, trust me." --- With chat logs.

That's your evidence right now. If it was that easy to ruin a team's reputation, I can't wait to see the next scandal.

mateuszsweg

ThePurv wrote: »

I ghosted for Prime a few months ago. Can we ban all of them?

id never ask a downy like you to do that for us, you'd fck something up

ryokashoot

232423452322 wrote: »

So if iI claim that I ghosted for ACE Gaming(which I didnt) then ill get banned and so will they?

With proof, yeah.
Like I said earlier, unless ice, blitzed or malte admit to it, there is not enough evidence.
Those are the people being accused. Unless ACTUAL evidence, not just someone saying they did it, is found and shown.

Doubt people would believe a random nobody.

Ryangi45

iiMaGiK wrote: »

i guess carbons was legit proof.
Because you know we actually heard david ghost for carbon.

Except that, the ghoster David Live admitted to it. There was a recording of Carbon talking about the time David Live ghosted for them, and then there was Carbon actually admitting to having David Live ghosting.

There is an insurmountable amount more evidence in Carbon's case then in this one. There is so little in this one its barley worth even talking about.

Ryangi45

ESG_Mike wrote: »

Here's your last warning though, make one more post about this issue and you will get a lifetime ban from ESG. We don't want toxic players in our community, and that's all you are.

How are you going to justify giving someone a lifetime ban over posting on a forum that has nothing to do with esg, on a matter not connected with esg, asking people who are not part of esg a question? This is like MEGA SUPER SIZE WOGL STATEMENT!