Hey, Polleus?

Polleus,

Once upon a time, Caliber1 asked for an extension passed the 15 minute grace period - because our 5th was having AC issues. He was in the room, and then got a game error. He restarted his AC, and it wouldn't run. He immediately went to your mumble, and talked with ERICK for 30 minutes trying to get the AC to run.

You told us "you have a 15 minute grace period. Kanata can make you play 4v5 at that point, or take a DQ win. Don't like it? Sorry, sucks."

Now, Kanata was nice enough in that situation to wait for us, and they nearly lost (it went to OT).

We then asked them to upload their screenshots for armour, since they delayed us a further 45 minutes through repetitive disconnects, and you also told us "Well, I'm invoking my powers as admin to say they don't have to upload screenshots when you request". The week before you'd DQ'd some Asian team for not uploading disputed screenshots.


Now, in this situation, when it's not even an AC issue - it's simply Kanata being slow...

They can take a few extra minutes to set up and get into the room? You can say "I'd give the same courtesy to every team"?

Compare those two situations. One is entirely a program's fault, and we got no additional time. One is entirely Kanata's fault, and they got additional time. Compare them again. Do you seriously think that this is how you should be making decisions? Yes? Compare those two situations again. And again, until your brain starts to work.


NOTE: For the record, I enjoy ESG. I often message Polleus with praise of one kind or another when I see he does something well. I have no problem admitting when someone does something right - in fact, I love seeing it. ESG has been doing a phenomenal job dealing with all of the issues and back-end work that needs to be done to keep things working, and I have thoroughly enjoyed participating in their events. But I similarly have no problem in pointing out when someone is being an idiot or making idiotic decisions. Which you are, Polleus.

You have been making consistently biased decisions when it comes to Kanata. I don't know what it will take for me to get you to see that, but it makes me incredibly sad to see such a promising league consistently making such absolutely ridiculous decisions.

Look at the only people who have supported you.

Ha.
JStaff.
Blackout.

There may be one or two others. But, the overwhelming consensus of the community was that you were making a biased decision in favor of Kanata. Yet you seem to be unaware of this. How can we reach you?

Comments

  • Ellustrial wrote: »
    Polleus,

    Once upon a time, Caliber1 asked for an extension passed the 15 minute grace period - because our 5th was having AC issues. He was in the room, and then got a game error. He restarted his AC, and it wouldn't run. He immediately went to your mumble, and talked with ERICK for 30 minutes trying to get the AC to run.

    You told us "you have a 15 minute grace period. Kanata can make you play 4v5 at that point, or take a DQ win. Don't like it? Sorry, sucks."

    Now, Kanata was nice enough in that situation to wait for us, and they nearly lost (it went to OT).

    We then asked them to upload their screenshots for armour, since they delayed us a further 45 minutes through repetitive disconnects, and you also told us "Well, I'm invoking my powers as admin to say they don't have to upload screenshots when you request". The week before you'd DQ'd some Asian team for not uploading disputed screenshots.


    Now, in this situation, when it's not even an AC issue - it's simply Kanata being slow...

    They can take a few extra minutes to set up and get into the room? You can say "I'd give the same courtesy to every team"?

    Compare those two situations. One is entirely a program's fault, and we got no additional time. One is entirely Kanata's fault, and they got additional time. Compare them again. Do you seriously think that this is how you should be making decisions? Yes? Compare those two situations again. And again, until your brain starts to work.


    NOTE: For the record, I enjoy ESG. I often message Polleus with praise of one kind or another when I see he does something well. I have no problem admitting when someone does something right - in fact, I love seeing it. ESG has been doing a phenomenal job dealing with all of the issues and back-end work that needs to be done to keep things working, and I have thoroughly enjoyed participating in their events. But I similarly have no problem in pointing out when someone is being an idiot or making idiotic decisions. Which you are, Polleus.

    You have been making consistently biased decisions when it comes to Kanata. I don't know what it will take for me to get you to see that, but it makes me incredibly sad to see such a promising lead consistently making such absolutely ridiculous decisions.

    Look at the only people who have supported you.

    Ha.
    JStaff.
    Blackout.

    There may be one or two others. But, the overwhelming consensus of the community was that you were making a biased decision in favor of Kanata. Yet you seem to be unaware of this. How can we reach you?

    is there a reason you added my name to this? please remove it i did not sign a petition saying i support polleus.

    thank you

    edit: you know the rules you cant create a thread directed to one person.... pm him
  • Ellustrial,

    Stop making your posts so long. Thanks.
  • you know why


    spoiler:
    8947_2025.gif

    You know what, they saving the prize for the 3rd place.

    Save your money is a better choice then save your reputation?
    Think again


    Thanks polleus for letting me know the strong power of MOD here.
  • Random Player 1 is one second late to match, DQ.
    Ace Gaming cheats twice, is in finals.
    Random Player 2 sprays a wall, DQ.

    and of all things Trio gets disqualified from the tournament, like seriously?
  • So part of your argument includes Kanata being nice enough to wait, then these guys won't?

    At least recognize that Trio tried to scumbag.

    And was that a finals match? (Not implying anything, just not sure)
  • MeepMerp wrote: »
    So part of your argument includes Kanata being nice enough to wait, then these guys won't?

    At least recognize that Trio tried to scumbag.

    And was that a finals match? (Not implying anything, just not sure)

    Yes. Our match was for a CFS qualifier semifinal - far more important than this event. Yet we had no extensions granted.
  • Please stop making public threads directed towards one person. You know how to reach me otherwise. Thank you.
This discussion has been closed.