Clash of Clans Match Reporting Thread
Comments
-
Yes, but you didnt...You couldve played with any player and after the match you wouldve said the same.
I presumed I did send it, Konrad. It was my fault.do you really expect anything less of tyler besides making excuses??????
Nah, it's fine. If they actually do want to take the win like that it's K. I mean, we fooled around if they think they had a chance against us, it's a joke.
Move them on if you want, this tournament doesn't mean anything. -
1. Teamballs agreed to a 4v5 before the match and after the 15 minute mark (which we forgave)imEXQUISITEE wrote: »Who was Invictus playing on your guys' team? he has not been placed on LCAs roster, he was actually removed by Tyler your captain, therefore you'd be DQed for playing with a player who isn't on your roster ( Which in doubt could be smurfed ) .... that being stated, will look into this further before I update the brackets, mmkay?
Because this is the roster Tyler last gave to me
Clan Name: LCAs
Captain: HOLDINGHANDS || 18692140
Member 2: ColdBum ||
Member 3: ._. || 10863332
Member 4: Sparkee || 5548933
Member 5: Beefjercky || 13368632
Sub 1: .maW || 5617135
Sub 2: sG.Pride || 15783613
Sub 3: _*Vader*_ || 14796964
AS you can see This player http://clan.z8games.com/charstat_cf.aspx?usn=9540959
Was not on your roster at all, so I can either DQ you for playing with someone that was NOT on your roster, or give you the win, but only winning by 2 rounds? I'd say I'm leaning towards DQ. Just letting you know.
2. Sleaze came in the middle of the game after they just agreed to a 4v5
3. Sleaze had his name card the whole game since he joined. -
KnifePartyy wrote: »1. Teamballs agreed to a 4v5 before the match and after the 15 minute mark (which we forgave)
2. Sleaze came in the middle of the game after they just agreed to a 4v5
3. Sleaze had his name card the whole game since he joined.
From the screenshots that was given to me,
1. LCAs played with a player that WASN'T ON THEIR ROSTER.
2. SS's showed that player talking smack almost the ENTIRE GAME.
3. Even at the middle of a game ( Which halftime is presumed at middle of the game ) they are allowed to substitute a player in, that player happened to be Sleaze which is on their roster.
4. Namecards are irrelevant considering LCAs played with a player illegally the entire time, then that player trash talked as well.
LCAs might've won, and they might not of been trying, which is ALSO irrelevant, LCAs has been wrecking this entire tournament ( That is true ) but they knew the rules and disobeyed them ( On purpose or not ). That being stated, I'm obligated to give the win to Team Balls.
Tyler, I know this tournament means nothing,I just wanted to do something for the public community for a change, and for fun. I'm sure players had some fun playing, and others did not, but hey, you can't please everyone!
Great job to EVERYONE who has played in my tournament!
Brackets have now been updated. -
-
imEXQUISITEE wrote: »From the screenshots that was given to me,
1. LCAs played with a player that WASN'T ON THEIR ROSTER.
2. SS's showed that player talking smack almost the ENTIRE GAME.
3. Even at the middle of a game ( Which halftime is presumed at middle of the game ) they are allowed to substitute a player in, that player happened to be Sleaze which is on their roster.
4. Namecards are irrelevant considering LCAs played with a player illegally the entire time, then that player trash talked as well.
LCAs might've won, and they might not of been trying, which is ALSO irrelevant, LCAs has been wrecking this entire tournament ( That is true ) but they knew the rules and disobeyed them ( On purpose or not ). That being stated, I'm obligated to give the win to Team Balls.
Tyler, I know this tournament means nothing,I just wanted to do something for the public community for a change, and for fun. I'm sure players had some fun playing, and others did not, but hey, you can't please everyone!
Great job to EVERYONE who has played in my tournament!
Brackets have now been updated.
1.) I already answered that.
2.) SS's? Please send them to me, I'd like to see.
3.) 3/4 of the game, but I really don't care that he came in. It was insanely boring.
4.) You say namecards are irrelevant, yet you posted it as a rule, and I believe WAL went off a namecard win.
Obviously we didn't intend to break the rules, and as you stated previously, namecards is a rule. So if both teams did break the rules, it should either be played as a rematch, or both team's should be DQ'd..
Aaron, obviously it doesn't mean anything. If people like TriX were allowed to participate, this tournament would've ended with them finishing first no doubt about it. You say you wanted to do something for the public community, but you're still not abiding by your own ruleset. It's pretty much like the last public tournament, which was UGL I believe. Which as to what I remember, you hosted. lol.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 709 CrossFire Announcements
- 712 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 320 Community
- 12 Modes
- 392 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 74 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 523 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 38 CrossFire Off Topic