Decrease the # of servers

DizcQ

that are rarely used.

Independency

DizcQ wrote: »

that are rarely used.

Some of them are used to competitive matches / 1o1 or players that have low ping in those servers. They could improve those servers but they won't delete them.

DizcQ

YouMadMate wrote: »

Some of them are used to competitive matches / 1o1 or players that have low ping in those servers. They could improve those servers but they won't delete them.

I'm pretty sure UK 1/2/3/4/5 w/e are really used.

i]MaGeS

DizcQ wrote: »

I'm pretty sure UK 1/2/3/4/5 w/e are really used.

There are some players who use other servers cuz they have lower ping on them.

[dot]

Fast individual servers with low load (few users per server) means a higher server FPS, meaning better reg.

If anything you should ask for more.

K4ZR4G0R3

I have a question
Less servers doesnt mean less maintainance costs?
So g4box could close 1-2 servers and save money to spend them fix/improve important things

MRain202

Maybe he has a point... If they re-sold the servers that are not commonly used and build a better one, then turn that into Alpha... Then turn alpha into Bravo and Bravo can go to hell, (really the lag there is incredible) and yay!

Really, are you guys really going to keep rather inactive servers (other than delta and echo) just so 10 people get to play their 1v1's?