[CFSA] Top 10 Highlights 2013

Comments

  • ...The announcer is legit...seriously...he talks SO FAST...like they are playing Football!
    Good Video, the plays are wow.

    Respect +1

    Also interesting how other versions of CF have some very awesome backers for it while the NA version is getting left in the dust.
  • ...The announcer is legit...seriously...he talks SO FAST...like they are playing Football!

    CFNA casters are terrible. No doubt about it. The way they talk is very dull (monotone) and anyone would not watch the stream in an instant. CFAL casters are more energetic, they get the audience's attention instantly.


    On another note, its pretty funny ( and somewhat ironic ) how CFAL's competitive leagues/community is more organized than CFNA . CFNA is lagging behind compared to their counterpart down in Latin America.
  • xHAMSTERRR wrote: »
    CFNA casters are terrible. No doubt about it. The way they talk is very dull (monotone) and anyone would not watch the stream in an instant. CFAL casters are more energetic, they get the audience's attention instantly.


    On another note, its pretty funny ( and somewhat ironic ) how CFAL's competitive leagues/community is more organized than CFNA . CFNA is lagging behind compared to their counterpart down in Latin America.

    Instead of just calling the casters terrible, give some constructive feedback on what could be done better.

    The fact that the Latin American competitive scene is bigger than the North American scene isn't because of "tournament organization." It is because Latin America naturally has a larger population which then automatically correlates to the popularity of the game. The North American scene is dominated by a plethora of FPS titles that are played competitively (CS:GO, TF2, Quake, etc), which yield higher interest. As such, Crossfire is inherently left behind.
  • envsnn wrote: »
    Instead of just calling the casters terrible, give some constructive feedback on what could be done better.

    The fact that the Latin American competitive scene is bigger than the North American scene isn't because of "tournament organization." It is because Latin America naturally has a larger population which then automatically correlates to the popularity of the game. The North American scene is dominated by a plethora of FPS titles that are played competitively (CS:GO, TF2, Quake, etc), which yield higher interest. As such, Crossfire is inherently left behind.

    I like the way NA casts their matches, not perfect BUT not as bad as the WCG casters that obviously weren't familiar with crossfire.

    ._. I wish CF weren't so left behind...then again I could just pick up another shooter. Just crossfire is interesting.
  • envsnn wrote: »
    Instead of just calling the casters terrible, give some constructive feedback on what could be done better.

    Just did, I said they were monotone and needed to be a tad bit more energetic. (L2R?)
    The fact that the Latin American competitive scene is bigger than the North American scene isn't because of "tournament organization." It is because Latin America naturally has a larger population which then automatically correlates to the popularity of the game.

    USA and Canada combined population on estimate is 348.78 million people (source: Google) These two countries have a HUGE population number, with what you said, this TOTALLY AUTOMATICALLY IS A HIGH POSITIVE CORRELATION!~ I can assure you that what you said is ALSO true about CF North America and United Kingdom.

    As you said, our country is over-saturated with a HUGE amount of First Person Shooters that are played competitively EVERY year. We can all agree that Call of Duty is played the most, and is very rewarding if you win MLGs. Which TOTALLY yields a higher interest, but however CrossFire yields interests FAR GREATER than any other FPS because the fact as YOU stated. Which is that our country has a high population which CERTAINLY correlates to high yields of interest and popularity of this title.