[GoCS]Match Reports and Disputes

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

Im not sure why Source is allowed to play this clan tourney when all they do is bring well known competitive players such as zezo, exquisite, nisi, july, etc to every match.

scumbags.

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

scumbags.

I was going to put sinatra on the list too but he sucks so it's whatever

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

scumbags.

I just realized you guys are using snitch lol

Scumbags

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

I just realized you guys are using snitch lol

Scumbags

smurfing is wrong and shouldn't be done in any context

Dark Beast

They'll allow anyone to play. Which is why this tourny is a waste of time for any real clan server clan. All this seems to be is a battle on who can have the most competitive players on one clan at a time.

lionwcyd

Dark Beast wrote: »

They'll allow anyone to play. Which is why this tourny is a waste of time for any real clan server clan. All this seems to be is a battle on who can have the most competitive players on one clan at a time.

Just because they play competitively doesn't mean they are any good.

2fastSNITCH

AKApope wrote: »

I just realized you guys are using snitch lol

Scumbags

snitch as in snitchez?

if so, wtf? lol

Dark Beast

lionheartban wrote: »

Just because they play competitively doesn't mean they are any good.

Maybe not, but regardless they would be better than most of the regular people in Clan Server. Last game I played in this tourny was like playing ASCEND.

AKApope

2fastSNITCH wrote: »

snitch as in snitchez?

if so, wtf? lol

hi _LoSt

2fastSNITCH

AKApope wrote: »

hi _LoSt

Again, what? lol

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

I just realized you guys are using snitch lol

Scumbags

and honestly we would still beat everybody without the likes of __LoSt, whoever that is

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

and honestly we would still beat everybody without the likes of __LoSt, whoever that is

Pretty sure you guys would have lost to veracity without Ha, wizdom, and snitch considering it was a pretty close game with those three smurfing for you guys

2fastSNITCH

AKApope wrote: »

Pretty sure you guys would have lost to veracity without Ha, wizdom, and snitch considering it was a pretty close game with those three smurfing for you guys

1) Why would I want to smurf with wizdom
2) If I was playing it wouldn't have been close

sorry

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

Pretty sure you guys would have lost to veracity without Ha, wizdom, and snitch considering it was a pretty close game with those three smurfing for you guys

1) only wizdom and lost were playing
2)we are much better than veracity and have proved that many times by winning
3)they fragged just as much as anyone else

AKApope

2fastSNITCH wrote: »

1) Why would I want to smurf with wizdom
2) If I was playing it wouldn't have been close

sorry

People from trix already told me so you might as well stop.

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

1) only wizdom and lost were playing
2)we are much better than veracity and have proved that many times by winning
3)they fragged just as much as anyone else

So you're telling me that ANT isnt Ha? Lol...I played with him on that alt before.

Also, lost carried the sh1t out of that match

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

So you're telling me that ANT isnt Ha? Lol...I played with him on that alt before.

Also, lost carried the sh1t out of that match

http://imgur.com/a/olmpP

forget anthony was playing lol

and getting 1/2 more frags than other people is not a carry

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

http://imgur.com/a/olmpP

forget anthony was playing lol

and getting 1/2 more frags than other people is not a carry

If you guys are much better than veracity, why did you use three smurfs who are obviously above average competitive players?

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

If you guys are much better than veracity, why did you use three smurfs who are obviously above average competitive players?

they play when we don't have our 5 on

which is a lot

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

they play when we don't have our 5 on

which is a lot

Lol im done


See you guys tomorrow

2fastSNITCH

AKApope wrote: »

People from trix already told me so you might as well stop.

lol I just got back from Honduras but ok

whatever floats your boat

AKApope

2fastSNITCH wrote: »

lol I just got back from Honduras but ok

whatever floats your boat

Nice, I just got back from the himalayas.

2fastSNITCH

AKApope wrote: »

Nice, I just got back from the himalayas.

That's cool .

HyunMinKim

Fast_wind wrote: »

http://imgur.com/a/olmpP

forget anthony was playing lol

and getting 1/2 more frags than other people is not a carry

Lost2stronk

Fast_wind

AKApope wrote: »

Lol im done


See you guys tomorrow

you can ask them, i've only asked them to play when absolutely necessary

HyunMinKim wrote: »

Lost2stronk

how exactly do you consider that a carry?

and all of you, if you think the games we've smurfed in would have had a different outcome, i beg you, play us again

HyunMinKim

Fast_wind wrote: »

you can ask them, i've only asked them to play when absolutely necessary


how exactly do you consider that a carry?

" and getting 1/2 more frags than other people is not a carry "

Just wanted to show it wasn't really 1/2 more frags then others.

Fast_wind

hyunminkim wrote: »

" and getting 1/2 more frags than other people is not a carry "

just wanted to show it wasn't really 1/2 more frags then others.

9 + 2 = 11

droppnBOWS

smurfing is not good

Fast_wind

and sean, must i bring up that not only did you smurf for wal a few days ago, but also asked to join our roster as well?

food for thought

AKApope

Fast_wind wrote: »

and sean, must i bring up that not only did you smurf for wal a few days ago, but also asked to join our roster as well?

food for thought

Shocker was getting offline so I decided to step in. Also, what's worse; having a player from a team that went to wcg or a player from another clan smurf for another team?

food for thought