New League?
I am thinking of starting a new league (as if there isnt enough already 
)
It would be a single man (or woman) league so no teams.
There would be a ranking system and a league champion.
Each player has their own rank and choose each week or biweek who they would challenge. Each player would have a certain amount of points their match is worth.
Here would be an example of the top 5 in the ranking system:
1.) Player A
2.) B
3.) C
4.) D
5.) E
So player E would choose to challenge players B-D
Each win gives points to move up in the standings.
It would need a lot of work but i think it is capable of being done
Thoughts?
Please try not to trash the idea too much
So as told to me by countless people this is a bad idea, i was thinking it was pretty cool, maybe just meant for the pub section then?....
Anyways, please read my last post on this thread. There is an apology there that i would like everyone that ive trashed talked to, to read it.
)It would be a single man (or woman) league so no teams.
There would be a ranking system and a league champion.
Each player has their own rank and choose each week or biweek who they would challenge. Each player would have a certain amount of points their match is worth.
Here would be an example of the top 5 in the ranking system:
1.) Player A
2.) B
3.) C
4.) D
5.) E
So player E would choose to challenge players B-D
Each win gives points to move up in the standings.
It would need a lot of work but i think it is capable of being done
Thoughts?
Please try not to trash the idea too much
So as told to me by countless people this is a bad idea, i was thinking it was pretty cool, maybe just meant for the pub section then?....
Anyways, please read my last post on this thread. There is an apology there that i would like everyone that ive trashed talked to, to read it.
Comments
-
Is it just me or is the competitive side of CF not open to new ideas?
It wouldnt bother me so much that this isnt a well liked idea if people would state a logical REASON as to why not.
Also im not saying i would be in charge of this either, as i do not feel i am suitable to lead it. And im sure if it was a liked idea alot of people would agree that i am not the suitable person to run it. -
Its_Maverick wrote: »Is it just me or is the competitive side of CF not open to new ideas?
It wouldnt bother me so much that this isnt a well liked idea if people would state a logical REASON as to why not.
Also im not saying i would be in charge of this either, as i do not feel i am suitable to lead it. And im sure if it was a liked idea alot of people would agree that i am not the suitable person to run it.
New ideas? They're still rejecting the current ones, lul. But that's because what's around and what has been suggested aren't quality. -
Its_Maverick wrote: »Is it just me or is the competitive side of CF not open to new ideas?
It wouldnt bother me so much that this isnt a well liked idea if people would state a logical REASON as to why not.
Also im not saying i would be in charge of this either, as i do not feel i am suitable to lead it. And im sure if it was a liked idea alot of people would agree that i am not the suitable person to run it.
Competitive players are open to new ideas from people who have good ideas. I attempted to steer you clear in your tournament thread with some of your awful ideas, but you refused to listen, so now I'm done babying you. Your ideas are dumb and you should feel bad about them. -
Competitive players are open to new ideas from people who have good ideas. I attempted to steer you clear in your tournament thread with some of your awful ideas, but you refused to listen, so now I'm done babying you. Your ideas are dumb and you should feel bad about them.
Oh.. is this LK? If so, i stated why i didnt listen to your ideas, and your lack of reasoning and understanding baffles me, LK or not. -
-
Its_Maverick wrote: »Oh.. is this LK? If so, i stated why i didnt listen to your ideas, and your lack of reasoning and understanding baffles me, LK or not.
No, I'm Ryangi. The guy who ran the 1st league for cf, designed the first anticheat, created the ruleset that has been used since wogl, made ocg what it is today, created the format that all the leagues now use, created ocg's (now butchered) playoff system. The guy you should really be listening to.
But your ideas of playing up to 10 was ******ed, as was your idea to turn off the ability to join after a game has started. Your reasoning was that it would mimic the clan system, when you failed to realize that we don't use the clan system for how awful all those ideas are. -
No, I'm Ryangi. The guy who ran the 1st league for cf, designed the first anticheat, created the ruleset that has been used since wogl, made ocg what it is today, created the format that all the leagues now use, created ocg's (now butchered) playoff system. The guy you should really be listening to.
But your ideas of playing up to 10 was ******ed, as was your idea to turn off the ability to join after a game has started. Your reasoning was that it would mimic the clan system, when you failed to realize that we don't use the clan system for how awful all those ideas are.
I have admitted that i didnt know everything, and yes the intrusion rule was revoked, but what still you dont understand is that the playing up to ten rule, was taken straight from the WCG ruleset... Two halves, 9 round halves, so the first team to 10 wins... -
Its_Maverick wrote: »I have admitted that i didnt know everything, and yes the intrusion rule was revoked, but what still you dont understand is that the playing up to ten rule, was taken straight from the WCG ruleset... Two halves, 9 round halves, so the first team to 10 wins...
The wcg ruleset, which is not actually used, was a misinterpretation in the original Chinese translation for the ruleset. The only time it has actually been used was in the finals lan of this year (Even though its been there since the start) and even then wasn't used in the "correct" function that the ruleset says. The only reason it was used at the lan was a time saving mechanism. -
Ok, well since i plan to join the competitive community, i will apologize for my actions. I am known to be stubborn and hard headed. But what you just did is all i ask for. Just a simple realistic explanation of things and why they should or shouldnt be rather than just saying this is dumb ect...
So, since i now know the reasoning for the round rule, do you have a suggestion as to what it should be? -
Its_Maverick wrote: »Ok, well since i plan to join the competitive community, i will apologize for my actions. I am known to be stubborn and hard headed. But what you just did is all i ask for. Just a simple realistic explanation of things and why they should or shouldnt be rather than just saying this is dumb ect...
So, since i now know the reasoning for the round rule, do you have a suggestion as to what it should be?
The default of 2 9 rounds halves like it has been for the last 4 years? -
Its_Maverick wrote: »That is exactly what i have!! lmao Two nine round halves which would result in the first team to win ten rounds.
No, no it would not.
what you imply is that if one team would win a half 9 to 8, then they would only need to win 1 round the next half. That is incorrect good sir. -
Its_Maverick wrote: »Ok so if im understanding what you're saying correctly, you are saying that each half is counted rather than each individual round, correct?
uhhhh no? Do I really need to break this down for someone whos running a tournament? Really?
Half 1
Team a: 9 rounds won
Team b: 6 rounds won
Half 2:
Team a needs 7 rounds to win the game and has to hold team b to 8 rounds
Team b needs 9 rounds to win the game and has to hold team a to 5 rounds. -
uhhhh no? Do I really need to break this down for someone whos running a tournament? Really?
Half 1
Team a: 9 rounds won
Team b: 6 rounds won
Half 2:
Team a needs 7 rounds to win the game and has to hold team b to 8 rounds
Team b needs 9 rounds to win the game and has to hold team a to 5 rounds.
because i dont know anything about running a tournament like this, hence why i stuck to the simpler version, as still as you laid it out for me, my mind isnt comprehending why they would play it out after team a would win 10 rounds, which would put them in a secure win. As team B would not have a chance at catching up. -
Its_Maverick wrote: »because i dont know anything about running a tournament like this, hence why i stuck to the simpler version, as still as you laid it out for me, my mind isnt comprehending why they would play it out after team a would win 10 rounds, which would put them in a secure win. As team B would not have a chance at catching up.
Soooooo.....
1st half
Team a: 9 rounds won
Team b: 5 rounds won
Overall score is 9 to 5
What your saying is:
2nd half
Team a: 1 round won = they win the game?
So if...
2nd half
Team a: 1 round won
Team b: 9 rounds won
Overall score is 10 to 14 with team b winning the game.
What you just said is that team b has no chance of catching team a even though they won more rounds then them. -
Soooooo.....
1st half
Team a: 9 rounds won
Team b: 5 rounds won
Overall score is 9 to 5
What your saying is:
2nd half
Team a: 1 round won = they win the game?
So if...
2nd half
Team a: 1 round won
Team b: 9 rounds won
Overall score is 10 to 14 with team b winning the game.
What you just said is that team b has no chance of catching team a even though they won more rounds then them.
I understand now. Ok so two nine round halves would equal a total number of 17 possible rounds per half.
so 34 total maximum game rounds.
I understand this now as what you said was true, i was stuck on the Clan War match simulation.
Why i chose the CW match style is due to the fact that this is a 1 day tourney, nor is it a LEAGUE tournament. Thats what people arent understanding. This was a tournament made for FUN and has nothing to do with League or Competitive play. That is why i chose this style after thinking about it. Rather than my reasoning being i took it straight from the the WCG rules.
And after thinking it over i plan to keep it how it is, as it will speed up the tournament process.
Sorry for my ignorance. But even after understanding what you are saying the rule will stay as it is. Now if there is anything else you would like to point out i would be more than happy to listen. -
I don't see this ending well. If I were you, I'd bury this idea and go find something else to do.
Just to clarify, i would not be hosting this nor organizing it, i just believe it would be a good idea, kind of like a one man champions series. -
Its_Maverick wrote: »Oh.. is this LK? If so, i stated why i didnt listen to your ideas, and your lack of reasoning and understanding baffles me, LK or not.
Kid, please you dont even know ryangi. Stop coming to the comp section, your idiotic is just amusing, go back to clan section or barrack, nobody in comp section have time for you.
You lack of knowledge in competitive, go learn abt it be4 making statement. Lack of reasoning ? Your stupidity is just too damn high for me to explain lmao. Im still laughing that ryangi has been explaining a rule to you over 3 posted and you somehow still dont understand.
Your skill level is below a average player in alpha, go improve if u want to play e8. It is not that ppl dont open to new ideas, but we dont open to new ideas come from a pub kid that dont know anything and keep talking. Just shut up and go back to your place.
And ryangi good luck in CS GO lan
, you can stop wasting your time with this guy now =_=, your brain cell should be working for something better than this.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 715 CrossFire Announcements
- 714 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 322 Community
- 12 Modes
- 393 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 73 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 524 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 37 CrossFire Off Topic