15oEdit

found a few clips saved today, dunno from when

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww_y91ucVy8





watched his ballsack 3 video, so i threw them together with the same style

Comments

  • Can you explain to me how this is an edit? Slowing down kills doesn't make it an edit.

    Nice frags tho
  • B_N wrote: »
    Can you explain to me how this is an edit? Slowing down kills doesn't make it an edit.

    Nice frags tho

    Editing a video makes it an edit..
  • WhyDoICare wrote: »
    Editing a video makes it an edit..

    What he makes are not edits.
  • B_N wrote: »
    What he makes are not edits.

    It's more like a fragshow.
  • B_N wrote: »
    What he makes are not edits.
    lol what are you getting at ?
  • B_N wrote: »
    What he makes are not edits.

    i think you're over thinking this
  • i think you're over thinking this

    Not really. Do you know the definition of video editing? I clearly don't seeing how all of you think slowing down frags is considered an edit.

    I thought edits consist of colors,effects,transitions,and smooths.

    idk just my personal opinion
  • B_N wrote: »
    Not really. Do you know the definition of video editing? I clearly don't seeing how all of you think slowing down frags is considered an edit.

    I thought edits consist of colors,effects,transitions,and smooths.

    idk just my personal opinion

    your personal opinion sucks
  • jG0NZ wrote: »
    your personal opinion sucks

    What is your opinion on "video editing"? Since you think my opinion sucks.
  • B_N wrote: »
    What is your opinion on "video editing"? Since you think my opinion sucks.

    you cant really put a single definition on "video editing"

    technically cutting a video into different parts is editing


    putting a song over the video is also technically editing
  • 4nStudent wrote: »
    you cant really put a single definition on "video editing"

    technically cutting a video into different parts is editing


    putting a song over the video is also technically editing

    I explained what I thought video editing was on the other page.

    What you "best?" make , aren't considered edits and if you look at what x0tek,xfamous ,suko and yourself make really aren't edits.

    Look at duck/monotox/the3n19ma/and myself make are considered "video editing".

    I see where you're coming from but I'll just leave it alone. Everyone else is right. I'm wrong. eos
  • B_N wrote: »
    I explained what I thought video editing was on the other page.

    What you "best?" make , aren't considered edits and if you look at what x0tek,xfamous ,suko and yourself make really aren't edits.

    Look at duck/monotox/the3n19ma/and myself make are considered "video editing".

    I see where you're coming from but I'll just leave it alone. Everyone else is right. I'm wrong. eos

    thanks for your opinion but by the technical defintion of "video editing", the people listed above all edit their videos.
  • B_N wrote: »
    I explained what I thought video editing was on the other page.

    What you "best?" make , aren't considered edits and if you look at what x0tek,xfamous ,suko and yourself make really aren't edits.

    Look at duck/monotox/the3n19ma/and myself make are considered "video editing".

    I see where you're coming from but I'll just leave it alone. Everyone else is right. I'm wrong. eos

    Your "opinion" on "video editing" is not all that important. If you had 1 mil+ subscribers on YT from edits, then maybe your opinion would make a difference.

    His video is an edit. The whole purpose of an edit is to make the video better, if he just uploads the raw clip, then it just looks bad. Editing the clip makes the video a lot better.

    Ex:

    Raw clip - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYf-exJuBuM
    (notice after I get the first 2k and I push up B long, I spray and miss a couple shots)

    Edited clip - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQy9EuLzVKE
    (but now in this clip I take away the spray, and just add in the 2 click, 1 click, 2 deag, 1 deag. It makes it look a lot better)
  • B_N wrote: »
    I explained what I thought video editing was on the other page.

    What you "best?" make , aren't considered edits and if you look at what x0tek,xfamous ,suko and yourself make really aren't edits.

    Look at duck/monotox/the3n19ma/and myself make are considered "video editing".

    I see where you're coming from but I'll just leave it alone. Everyone else is right. I'm wrong. eos

    petergriffinomgwtfcares.gif

    Why get caught up in the semantics? The point of a video is to entertain. You could call it an 'edit' or a 'tide' or a 'ballsack' and it wouldn't make a difference. Reid's frag videos are entertaining and that's all that matters. Frags make up the substance of a frag video (duh) and colors and transitions are just trivial stylistic choices, IMO, unless your style is actually unique, say like Denxi's or something.
  • Hanthony1 wrote: »
    Your "opinion" on "video editing" is not all that important. If you had 1 mil+ subscribers on YT from edits, then maybe your opinion would make a difference.

    His video is an edit. The whole purpose of an edit is to make the video better, if he just uploads the raw clip, then it just looks bad. Editing the clip makes the video a lot better.

    Ex:

    Raw clip - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYf-exJuBuM
    (notice after I get the first 2k and I push up B long, I spray and miss a couple shots)

    Edited clip - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQy9EuLzVKE
    (but now in this clip I take away the spray, and just add in the 2 click, 1 click, 2 deag, 1 deag. It makes it look a lot better)
    The 2nd link you posted is considered an edit. The first one is a tide or ballsack like x0teks 15otideorballsack
    1nsomniac wrote: »
    petergriffinomgwtfcares.gif

    Why get caught up in the semantics? The point of a video is to entertain. You could call it an 'edit' or a 'tide' or a 'ballsack' and it wouldn't make a difference. Reid's frag videos are entertaining and that's all that matters. Frags make up the substance of a frag video (duh) and colors and transitions are just trivial stylistic choices, IMO, unless your style is actually unique, say like Denxi's or something.

    Iight i'll start calling his "edits" tides or ballsacks.
  • B_N wrote: »
    I explained what I thought video editing was on the other page.

    What you "best?" make , aren't considered edits and if you look at what x0tek,xfamous ,suko and yourself make really aren't edits.

    Look at duck/monotox/the3n19ma/and myself make are considered "video editing".

    I see where you're coming from but I'll just leave it alone. Everyone else is right. I'm wrong. eos
    B_N wrote: »
    What he makes are not edits.

    Then what are they?

    See, to me, you can look at the term "Video Editing" in two ways in this context; technically, or with implications.

    Do x0tec's videos fit the term technically? Yes, there's no argument there. He is taking video footage and editing it, it is a video edit.

    Do x0tec's videos fit the implications of the term? The real question here is, what are those implication? What's the spirit of the word being used?

    All I can say is that if your definition of a video edit is rooted in whether or not they use certain technique when editing, I would hope that you'd rethink that. To me, a something qualifies as a "video edit" as long as the creator had a goal of creating some kind of atmosphere/flow/feeling to it. However, regardless of how you define what is and isn't a video edit, it doesn't really make much sense to me to post solely for the purpose of questioning the videos qualifications. Labels shouldn't really matter to people who do things for the right reasons, and it's always better to just offer some advice on improvement.
  • [MOD]Denxi wrote: »
    Then what are they?

    See, to me, you can look at the term "Video Editing" in two ways in this context; technically, or with implications.

    Do x0tec's videos fit the term technically? Yes, there's no argument there. He is taking video footage and editing it, it is a video edit.

    Do x0tec's videos fit the implications of the term? The real question here is, what are those implication? What's the spirit of the word being used?

    All I can say is that if your definition of a video edit is rooted in whether or not they use certain technique when editing, I would hope that you'd rethink that. To me, a something qualifies as a "video edit" as long as the creator had a goal of creating some kind of atmosphere/flow/feeling to it. However, regardless of how you define what is and isn't a video edit, it doesn't really make much sense to me to post solely for the purpose of questioning the videos qualifications. Labels shouldn't really matter to people who do things for the right reasons, and it's always better to just offer some advice on improvement.

    I like how you do shit around here, and the way you respond to "trolls or haters" .

    To answer your question " Then what are they?"

    they are ballsacktides.
  • B_N wrote: »
    I like how you do shit around here, and the way you respond to "trolls or haters" .

    To answer your question " Then what are they?"

    they are ballsacktides.

    .... -facepalm-