Bandicam/fraps considered "on client"?

Bipolar_kr

Would you consider it to be on-client even though it's not per se?


The user can't wallhack, speed, etc. and if the guy is aimbotting, the opposite team can save the replay of him 360'ing.

what do you guys think? i am just curious as to what the community thinks

IT_Aero

I believe it's a viable anti-cheat. People claim there are overlays and all that but I've never seen proof of it.

THEREALDAG

not on client but for most cases if a person plays on video they're prob legit

CFGu

IT_Aero wrote: »

I believe it's a viable anti-cheat. People claim there are overlays and all that but I've never seen proof of it.

I think someone once told me you can bypass Bandicam and Fraps using a second monitor to host the cheats and then run CrossFire on the first monitor while recording only the first monitor.

I don't have proof though.

vKonrad

CFGu wrote: »

I think someone once told me you can bypass Bandicam and Fraps using a second monitor to host the cheats and then run CrossFire on the first monitor while recording only the first monitor.

I don't have proof though.

How would that make sense, as Bandicam/Fraps just record what is displayed on the screen.

Sure it'd record CrossFire gameplay as normal, but it would be normal.

Ellustrial

definitely not


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgGO2RS6yrI

1nsomniac

Not 'on client,' but the next best thing. I like to run both concurrently when I play matches just for the hell of it.

DAPFAP

Not all aim cheats do 360s though.

2fastSTREAK

DAPFAP wrote: »

Not all aim cheats do 360s though.

Yes they do. Some may not 360 as much, but every once in a while they will 360.

AwfulFallout

just watch throne's growler

SmasherX

u can overlay on stream idk about bandi

2fastSTREAK

Never really tried finding a way to cheat while recording, but you can cham if you record with a logo (like zezo did)

theFOOB

^ Legit #reddotz.

mateuszsweg

IT_Aero wrote: »

I believe it's a viable anti-cheat. People claim there are overlays and all that but I've never seen proof of it.

Irman is an example in terms of bypassing bandicam. He busted himself not to long ago. Thanks to chubrub, xD.

ESG_Mike

Made this up for you guys, sorry about the bad quality. I recorded from a cell phone and showed the black text box that appears in the upper right corner is a form of undetectable drawing. I then run bandicam and open the recording to show that the black box with the text "www.myanticheat.com" are not visible on the bandicam recording.

http://youtu.be/A5mKOlMntmE

retrodeezy

MyAnticheat wrote: »

Made this up for you guys, sorry about the bad quality. I recorded from a cell phone and showed the black text box that appears in the upper right corner is a form of undetectable drawing. I then run bandicam and open the recording to show that the black box with the text "www.myanticheat.com" are not visible on the bandicam recording.

http://youtu.be/A5mKOlMntmE

^There is your answer.

CFGu

pope_banned wrote: »

No, what you said was possibly the dumbest thing I have ever read on the forums.

Its been proven. Its correct.

Bipolar_kr

CFGu wrote: »

Its been proven. Its correct.

Wrong, what you said is possible for OCG AC but not bandicam.

ALxian

itsHA wrote: »

Irman is an example in terms of bypassing bandicam. He busted himself not to long ago. Thanks to chubrub, xD.

He never busted me. He blows at this game and always will.

I admitted to cheating.

& there are cheats that don't show up on bandi, no bypass..

[Denxi]

Bandi and Fraps are not "on client."

In actuality Growler Guncam is more secure than bandi or fraps. From what I've heard, because bandi and fraps tie directly into DirectX, you can work around what they record and what is actually displayed. Growler just straight records your screen though, so any visual stuff won't work.

No real confirmation on that though, just theories.

warhawkEGEBT

It's good but many cheats will still be unseen such as:

Radar
No spread
Nade reduction (not fully no nade)
Player skeletons (I'm not too sure about this one)

Bipolar_kr

Creative_S wrote: »

It's good but many cheats will still be unseen such as:

Radar
No spread
Nade reduction (not fully no nade)
Player skeletons (I'm not too sure about this one)

1.Pretty sure your bandi would show any red dots on your radar lmao..
2. No spread can be identified by looking at the crosshair
3. Arent skeletons like chams? It would be obvi then

warhawkEGEBT

pope_banned wrote: »

1.Pretty sure your bandi would show any red dots on your radar lmao..
2. No spread can be identified by looking at the crosshair
3. Arent skeletons like chams? It would be obvi then

Nope

Nope, I can't remember what one it was but no spread itself does not change crosschair size, that's no recoil. No spread stops the gun from moving left,right,up,down when the trigger is held, there is recoil its just reduced and almost un-noticed.

No its not, its less than 1mm thick and can't be seen from far range (its like a thin line on the spine,head,and legs) but I don't know if it can be seen on bandi/fraps... Go ask a cheater.

Throne_LK

I think it is easy to by pass bandi like ^ this guy said mr Warhawk, the wide spread and recoil, I mean for ppl that recording at 10 fps 10 quality we cant really see anything .