Weapon reliability

AWish

Well this was just a thought. After every game you weapon gets damaged and needs to be repaired. But in rl the ak is way cheaper to keep compared to the m16 .Im not saying that me ak wouldnt be less acurate when damaged .But i do think the ak should a take less damage each round or b not be afectad as much by being damaged.
But on the flip side the m16 is known ro break down easier (and jamm frequently)so wouldnt its acuracy be afected more by being damaged?.I know weapons are affected by how much their fierd each round but shouldnt an ak be less afected

Another instance is the p90 as the bullets are loaded sideways in the top mounded magazine it never jams .Not saying it wont be affected by damage but it should be less affected than the cheap uzi.

I thing something like this would ad another dimension to how you chose your weapons

what do you think?

lbrettl

No offence but if you want realism dont play games...

AWish

lbrettl wrote: »

No offence but if you want realism dont play games...

i never said anything about realism
it was just an idea that all

eZyKillQQ

New ideas should be posted in the Suggestions section.

Envyy

The ak-47 is hella reliable in real life.

RendoRazor

and cheap to repair..... there is so many of them floating around after the fall of the soviet union you can't hardly walk "10 preverbial feet" with out tripping over parts for one.

headcrazy1oo

Dude, The AK is to most solid of guns. Some models example the Bulgarian one can pass under a tank and still work. M16 if you put a little bit of Sand and the gun blocks.

Kripz

Pentcho wrote: »

Dude, The AK is to most solid of guns. Some models example the Bulgarian one can pass under a tank and still work. M16 if you put a little bit of Sand and the gun blocks.

ROFL... aww

ELITE13

One of the main reasons for the ak-47 amazing reliability is because the parts have a lot of space to move around unlike most guns in which the parts are pushed together to save space. I have thought of this reliability aspect to guns before and just thought why not?

Jammaal

AWish wrote: »

Well this was just a thought. After every game you weapon gets damaged and needs to be repaired. But in rl the ak is way cheaper to keep compared to the m16 .Im not saying that me ak wouldnt be less acurate when damaged .But i do think the ak should a take less damage each round or b not be afectad as much by being damaged.
But on the flip side the m16 is known ro break down easier (and jamm frequently)so wouldnt its acuracy be afected more by being damaged?.I know weapons are affected by how much their fierd each round but shouldnt an ak be less afected

Another instance is the p90 as the bullets are loaded sideways in the top mounded magazine it never jams .Not saying it wont be affected by damage but it should be less affected than the cheap uzi.

I thing something like this would ad another dimension to how you chose your weapons

what do you think?

lol good idea, but then the gun prices would have to be very varied, some very cheap some expenseive...

and also everyone would buy an ak then since its cheap, easy to maintain, and powerful...

Rebornchaos

exactly, it would throw the current balance of weapons , although tbh, right now its just noobs with S-light, AWM, kriss or thompson, with only like 20% of people using something interesting ... its a good idea, but it should be in the suggestions section