Ranked kick voting
I see a lot of people being kicked on false accusations, including myself... These people are often quite high ranked people, because the experince make them play good without hacks.
So I suggest a rank based kick vote system to save those innocent people from getting kicked. My idea simply is that low ranks can be kicked with 10 votes in a full room as it is now, but you would need 11 votes to kick a liutenant, 12 to kick a captain and 13 to kick a major. I think this would maybe save some innocent guys from getting kicked...
The problem is that hackers would maybe hack the rank system - would they be able to do this?
So I suggest a rank based kick vote system to save those innocent people from getting kicked. My idea simply is that low ranks can be kicked with 10 votes in a full room as it is now, but you would need 11 votes to kick a liutenant, 12 to kick a captain and 13 to kick a major. I think this would maybe save some innocent guys from getting kicked...
The problem is that hackers would maybe hack the rank system - would they be able to do this?
Comments
-
I see a lot of people being kicked on false accusations, including myself... These people are often quite high ranked people, because the experince make them play good without hacks.
So I suggest a rank based kick vote system to save those innocent people from getting kicked. My idea simply is that low ranks can be kicked with 10 votes in a full room as it is now, but you would need 11 votes to kick a liutenant, 12 to kick a captain and 13 to kick a major. I think this would maybe save some innocent guys from getting kicked...
The problem is that hackers would maybe hack the rank system - would they be able to do this?
have been suggested before several times, and havent u seen lately high rank hackers? I am so no -
I see a lot of people being kicked on false accusations, including myself... These people are often quite high ranked people, because the experince make them play good without hacks.
So I suggest a rank based kick vote system to save those innocent people from getting kicked. My idea simply is that low ranks can be kicked with 10 votes in a full room as it is now, but you would need 11 votes to kick a liutenant, 12 to kick a captain and 13 to kick a major. I think this would maybe save some innocent guys from getting kicked...
The problem is that hackers would maybe hack the rank system - would they be able to do this?have been suggested before several times, and havent u seen lately high rank hackers? I am so no
Your suggestion could be cool and useful, but.
My LAST cw I played against a "silver" major shooting thru walls, pubs with high ranks, as stated by jarmpz.
This wouldn't work out as high ranks also haacks.. -
So give the Smiley faces the kicks to kick all the generals...
You're missing the point that being the ratio of hackers and their ranks as the rank gets higher.
Nobody can argue with any integrity that they see just as many higher ranked hackers as lower ranked ones. -
I see a lot of people being kicked on false accusations, including myself... These people are often quite high ranked people, because the experince make them play good without hacks.
So I suggest a rank based kick vote system to save those innocent people from getting kicked. My idea simply is that low ranks can be kicked with 10 votes in a full room as it is now, but you would need 11 votes to kick a liutenant, 12 to kick a captain and 13 to kick a major. I think this would maybe save some innocent guys from getting kicked...
The problem is that hackers would maybe hack the rank system - would they be able to do this?
Hackers will never go away. I wish they would. -
-
The original poster never mentioned the fact that there are hackers, so why even bring it up?
His suggestion was based on the fact that lower rank users, who are jealous, tend to kick higher ranked users, who are doing good.
+1, this is a variant of an idea I had, everyone just needs to drop the factor of hackers because it's not a permanent situation, and not all high ranked players hack. -
I've been playing this game since 09 and have been accused of hacking and cheating so many times since then -> yet I still have my honorable solider ribbon.
The problem is that most people don't even have enough experience with the game to understand of someone is hacking or not.
If you do anything remotely exceptional in Crossfire inexperienced players will accuse you of hacking the second they are killed. Although, from experience I can say your more likely to get kicked than someone who is actually hacking. I guess that's cf for yah.
Ranks are pointless: -1 -
Easily hundreds of times more low rank hackers then high rank hackers.
What is the better outcome?
Being kicked by low rank noobs nearly every game unless you stick with clanmates and friends well watching blatant hackers rarely get kicked.
Or
Being able to play dozens of games with out being kicked because only equal or higher rank players (Who are more likely to tell the difference between hack and skill) being able to kick you and occasionally running into a hacker that can't be kicked.
Rather then change the amount of F11's needed, I'd change who could start kick on who.
Trainees-Sergeants can only kick Sergeants or below. Staff Sergeants-Master Sergeants can only kick Master Sergeants or below. Second LT-Captain can only kick Captain or below. And Major-Marshal can kick anyone. Separated rank into groups to give some wiggle room on kicking.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 715 CrossFire Announcements
- 714 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 323 Community
- 12 Modes
- 393 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 73 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 524 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 37 CrossFire Off Topic