steyr hs 50 m1

SFCFlo

This





Is the same gun just from 2 perspectives

what you think? Just wondering

Frecklez

No...Just, no...

SFCFlo

[MOD]Frecklez wrote: »

No...Just, no...

why?

m2s

Urkel2005

[MOD]Frecklez wrote: »

No...Just, no...

Well, I guess Frecklez has an allergy towards powerful sniper rifles, and I totally agree on what she says about the AWM. However, if they bring out the original version (the one on the picture is a .50 HS M1, which has a magazine), it would be single-shot with manual reload. So if you suggest a .50 HS: very nice idea. If you suggest a .50 HS M1: no, we don't need another overpowered magazine-fed Sniper rifle.

best regards,
Urkel

5595488

Why Peopel always want a 50 Cal Rifle? in this Game ? it would be the Same as AWM 1 Shoot so just take that AWM and fine.


RGScholokov

Frecklez

SFCFlo wrote: »

why?

m2s

The same reason why we haven't added the Barrett .50 cal yet. It's just too much. We already have snipers that do 100 HP damage to the entire upper body. We don't need a sniper that will do 100 HP damage to the legs as well.

SFCFlo

Urkel2005 wrote: »

Well, I guess Frecklez has an allergy towards powerful sniper rifles, and I totally agree on what she says about the AWM. However, if they bring out the original version (the one on the picture is a .50 HS M1, which has a magazine), it would be single-shot with manual reload. So if you suggest a .50 HS: very nice idea. If you suggest a .50 HS M1: no, we don't need another overpowered magazine-fed Sniper rifle.

best regards,
Urkel

Firstly i thought about the standard .50 HS but than i thought ppl will not be interested in getting a sniper with just 1 bullet and than they have to reload.

[MOD]Frecklez wrote: »

The same reason why we haven't added the Barrett .50 cal yet. It's just too much. We already have snipers that do 100 HP damage to the entire upper body. We don't need a sniper that will do 100 HP damage to the legs as well.

Well, yea. About this i think in the same way as you. But would ppl use a sniper frequently if it don't make 100 HP damage?

Frecklez

SFCFlo wrote: »

Well, yea. About this i think in the same way as you. But would ppl use a sniper frequently if it don't make 100 HP damage?

Then it wouldn't be much of a .50 cal.

CFGu

[MOD]Frecklez wrote: »

The same reason why we haven't added the Barrett .50 cal yet. It's just too much. We already have snipers that do 100 HP damage to the entire upper body. We don't need a sniper that will do 100 HP damage to the legs as well.

Yeah that would be SUPER op! Do you know how many leg shots people get? Imagine if ALL of those were 100 damage with 100% accuracy!

YotoPian

very bad