CSN battle nights

acgSNITCH

NoLogic4me wrote: »

We lost to hrg?

Obviously.

Can you play the 3rd place match?

oLOGIC

excepional wrote: »

Obviously.

Can you play the 3rd place match?

When is it

acgSNITCH

NoLogic4me wrote: »

When is it

Now, josh still hasn't gotten home yet -_-

Imaginative

[MOD]Iceman wrote: »

Stop spewing your bull on the forums. You and I both know this didnt happen....that ss was not of esg ac....please uninstall this game and leave the forums.

You know nothing about coding. You and Kris are both handicapped technology wise and if you're going lie about that SS not being the anti cheat you're completely oblivious.

ESG_Mike

Imaginative wrote: »

You know nothing about coding. You and Kris are both handicapped technology wise and if you're going lie about that SS not being the anti cheat you're completely oblivious.

Good thing we didn't rely on either of them to code the anti-cheat then. Also, I've seen this picture. Assuming it is the anti-cheat, you loaded a static disassembly in IDA. Anyone can do that. It still doesn't change the fact that nothing is actually being done at that point.

I'll be nice and break it down for people like you who want to claim they bypass myAntiCheat/ESG. The executable is a GUI and a login, with a few other functions to initialize the virtual machine and contact the myac servers. The actual code isn't loaded with it, so IDA wouldn't pick up anything other than a few failsafe functions, which wouldn't even be loaded at that point, so you wouldn't see them. You can try loading it into Ollydbg after you bypass the VM, fix the headers and import tables, and unpack it. Then you might impress me. But for now, your just as worthless as tastylimes. Go kill yourself script kiddy.

Imaginative

MyAnticheat wrote: »

Good thing we didn't rely on either of them to code the anti-cheat then. Also, I've seen this picture. Assuming it is the anti-cheat, you loaded a static disassembly in IDA. Anyone can do that. It still doesn't change the fact that nothing is actually being done at that point.

I'll be nice and break it down for people like you who want to claim they bypass myAntiCheat/ESG. The executable is a GUI and a login, with a few other functions to initialize the virtual machine and contact the myac servers. The actual code isn't loaded with it, so IDA wouldn't pick up anything other than a few failsafe functions, which wouldn't even be loaded at that point, so you wouldn't see them. You can try loading it into Ollydbg after you bypass the VM, fix the headers and import tables, and unpack it. Then you might impress me. But for now, your just as worthless as tastylimes. Go kill yourself script kiddy.

You are the most unprofessional person I've ever seen.

You go and make posts on anticheat troubleshooting threads about how people use Wal-Mart computers, regardless if they do your anticheat should work with dual core systems. Good work on efficient coding!

I doubt the anticheat was even working on WCG matches, half of the people I asked told me it didn't even detect Crossfire was running in the system tray.


I find it hilarious that you explain how your anticheat works but fail to give simple evidence on a ban (sheepbacon) other than explaining how cheats work and claiming he was doing it, then making comparisons from ESG to ESEA on how you don't give evidence on bans (ESEA does give evidence on bans and tell you what you got caught for)

(FYI, you just gave information to the community on how to disable your anticheat during important matches since all your code is on a remote server )


Think before you post and try to maintain a level of professionalism, script kiddy.

froztee_cnk

They should just make a AC that doesn't make you lag what so ever

HWG_Rain

Twinney wrote: »

Its not ericks team is brandos.. and if u wacth the games is brando and harveys frags that win the game everyone else was not worth mentioning.

you seem mad, need a hug?

ESG_Mike

Imaginative wrote: »

You are the most unprofessional person I've ever seen.

You go and make posts on anticheat troubleshooting threads about how people use Wal-Mart computers, regardless if they do your anticheat should work with dual core systems. Good work on efficient coding!

I doubt the anticheat was even working on WCG matches, half of the people I asked told me it didn't even detect Crossfire was running in the system tray.


I find it hilarious that you explain how your anticheat works but fail to give simple evidence on a ban (sheepbacon) other than explaining how cheats work and claiming he was doing it, then making comparisons from ESG to ESEA on how you don't give evidence on bans (ESEA does give evidence on bans and tell you what you got caught for)

(FYI, you just gave information to the community on how to disable your anticheat during important matches since all your code is on a remote server )


Think before you post and try to maintain a level of professionalism, script kiddy.

The FPS drop is due to poor game engine optimization, not poor anticheat coding. I've had several players test the anti-cheat on other games like CS:GO and not have any lag or FPS drop at all.

ESEA provides ban evidence? They say you cheated, they don't tell you how they determined that. I gave enough evidence on what was found running on sheepbacons computer, telling you technical information such as the hook address is pointless since the only people it would help are cheat coders.

There are systems in place to ensure the correct code is being run, have fun disabling them.