TAR 21 - Camo

2»

Comments

  • Making a silenced AWM would be OP.

    Also, +1 to OPs suggestion. We need more reskins that are not M4A1/AWM/AK47
    That's because the AWM is OP, not the adding of a suppressor.
  • That's because the AWM is OP, not the adding of a suppressor.

    Like I said before you RUDELY deleted my comment, the AWM is not OP.


    If you would care to debate why you think it is, go ahead. But just a fair warning, you won't win.
  • Like I said before you RUDELY deleted my comment, the AWM is not OP.


    If you would care to debate why you think it is, go ahead. But just a fair warning, you won't win.

    It is.

    1.) You are basically just waiting for the Enemy's Name to appear on your screen.
    2.) You press Right Click and left Click very fast
    3.) And voila, the enemy is no more.

    Guns like the PSG show how Sniping was actually MEANT to be.
  • Like I said before you RUDELY deleted my comment, the AWM is not OP.


    If you would care to debate why you think it is, go ahead. But just a fair warning, you won't win.

    How is the awm not op?

    -_-
  • M1600wner wrote: »
    It is.

    1.) You are basically just waiting for the Enemy's Name to appear on your screen.
    2.) You press Right Click and left Click very fast
    3.) And voila, the enemy is no more.

    Guns like the PSG show how Sniping was actually MEANT to be.

    You're an idiot. Clear cut. Do snipers really have to 2 shot to kill people? LOL no.

    Not my fault you're dumb enough to walk into the line of fire of someone hardscoping, or be that slow w/ a rifle you can't kill someone before he peaks trying to quickscope. Which isn't as easy as most people think, since most people can't do it effectively.

    How is the awm not op?

    -_-


    Because it's slower than a rifle. Yeah you can possibly get the first shot on a guy and get the kill if you're decent, but say 4 people are rushing site and you have an awp.. It would be much better with a rifle.


    I'm tired of people saying the AWM is OP. If so, then headshots are OP aswell!
  • You're an idiot. Clear cut. Do snipers really have to 2 shot to kill people? LOL no.

    Not my fault you're dumb enough to walk into the line of fire of someone hardscoping, or be that slow w/ a rifle you can't kill someone before he peaks trying to quickscope. Which isn't as easy as most people think, since most people can't do it effectively.





    Because it's slower than a rifle. Yeah you can possibly get the first shot on a guy and get the kill if you're decent, but say 4 people are rushing site and you have an awp.. It would be much better with a rifle.


    I'm tired of people saying the AWM is OP. If so, then headshots are OP aswell!

    Lol,

    gg .
  • Lol,

    gg .

    hue.


    I was banned. 5th ban in a few days.
  • hue.


    I was banned. 5th ban in a few days.

    Damn bruh,

    what a record huh.
  • Damn bruh,

    what a record huh.

    yeah man, esp. when I'm not even doing anything wrong.


    Who are you again?
  • Like I said before you RUDELY deleted my comment, the AWM is not OP.


    If you would care to debate why you think it is, go ahead. But just a fair warning, you won't win.
    If you finish your post with an insult, you shouldn't be surprised if your entire post gets deleted.

    Now for that debate. The AWM is OP for two simple reasons:

    1). 100 HP damage anywhere to the upper body. It doesn't matter if you hit the head, the chest, the gut or the arms. Upper body means instant kill. There is no margin of error, like with the Dragunov for example, that forces you to aim for harder-to-hit vital areas.

    2). Quick Scoping. The whole idea that you can fire a sniper rifle at 100% accuracy without aiming at your target through your scope, is absolutely absurd. Yet the AWM allows this.

    These two points separately already make a rifle extremely powerful, but the AWM combines theme.
  • Since you can't take a hint, Suko, I'm forced to temporarily close this thread until there is a MOD or GM online to deal with you. After that is done, this thread can be reopened to resume its purpose.
This discussion has been closed.