Eu > na
Comments
-
-
Until both EU and NA play on LAN, there's no way to decide who's better.
If a EU team and a NA team play, and each side wins on their servers, over and over again, then you could say that.
But if a EU team and a NA team play both servers and one of them wins every game(R.O.C this case), why is there a LAN needed to decide who's better? Isn't it obvious? -
If a EU team and a NA team play, and each side wins on their servers, over and over again, then you could say that.
But if a EU team and a NA team play both servers and one of them wins every game(R.O.C this case), why is there a LAN needed to decide who's better? Isn't it obvious?
Did you see who LPK was using...? -
golani___i3u wrote: »Prepare yourself for a brand new episode of "Americans and their excuses".
Tomorrow at 6 PM EST (Seals vs pCp will be done by then I hope :X)
Prepare yourself for "NA back on top".
Tomorrow at *insert time here* (Don't even know the exact time we're playing :X) -
You imagine what will happen if you don't win. But yea, I'm already preaparing for the new episode of "Americans and their excuses".golani___i3u wrote: »Prepare yourself for a brand new episode of "Americans and their excuses".
Tomorrow at 6 PM EST (Seals vs pCp will be done by then I hope :X) -
Yes I did,and some of them were awful(this game),but keep in mind R.O.C didn't used its main roster also.
Let's go ahead and point some stuff out here.
ROC has all solid players, subs or not.
ROC is used to playing with a higher ping, NA players are not.
LPK resorted to using people who are just god awful at this game. (no offence) -
You imagine what will happen if you don't win. But yea, I'm already preaparing for the new episode of "Americans and their excuses".
Even if we do lose, a loss is a loss... Teams lose teams win, it's not even that huge of a deal.
but I'm 99% sure we'll come out on top.
-
Let's go ahead and point some stuff out here.
ROC has all solid players, subs or not.
LPK resorted to using people who are just god awful at this game. (no offence)
ping isn't the factor, i've been playing on uk server all week. it's just like playing in echo or on west coast.
ROC has people who for the most part has played since 2009. LPK does not.
Let's be real, what if Boo played instead of xerath. I mean he's a backup. -
What if Ajken and Doughner didn't ping over 200ping isn't the factor, i've been playing on uk server all week. it's just like playing in echo or on west coast.
ROC has people who for the most part has played since 2009. LPK does not.
Let's be real, what if Boo played instead of xerath. I mean he's a backup.
ooooooooooooooooooooo -
if i was ornery i would ask you for those port replays from uk server from this spring
KEKE let's not bring that up -- It'll spoil ROC's victory. They got humiliated then and barely manage to come out on top this time around.
Replay available to exploit ROC's port weakness. -
Let's go ahead and point some stuff out here.
ROC has all solid players, subs or not.
ROC is used to playing with a higher ping, NA players are not.
LPK resorted to using people who are just god awful at this game. (no offence)
ROC won the first half with Doughner on 268 ping and Ajken on 220. That sure is not the same as LPK having between 100 and 140.
LPK stated multiple times they could beat ROC on both Echo AND UK servers.
LPK resorted to using the ringers that they chose to use. Im sure they had a lot of people to choose from as there are a lot of people from the NA side here that have watched the cast.
All in all, it doesnt matter. ROC won, it was nice to see and LPK, as everyone, didnt like to lose. -
Saranghaee wrote: »ROC won the first half with Doughner on 268 ping and Ajken on 220. That sure is not the same as LPK having between 100 and 140.
LPK stated multiple times they could beat ROC on both Echo AND UK servers.
LPK resorted to using the ringers that they chose to use. Im sure they had a lot of people to choose from as there are a lot of people from the NA side here that have watched the cast.
All in all, it doesnt matter. ROC won, it was nice to see and LPK, as everyone, didnt like to lose.
would you rather LPK not show up?
enjoy it eu, cause this was your only chance to be apart of wcg. i'll be sure to send the trophy to rufus along with the over sized check -
Let's go ahead and point some stuff out here.
ROC has all solid players, subs or not.
ROC is used to playing with a higher ping, NA players are not.
LPK resorted to using people who are just god awful at this game. (no offence)
I have to agree with you there. But, even if roc had solid players, it dosen't mean those were the best they could come up with. Imo the best roster R.O.C could use is rufus, xerath, doughner, phong, and kive.They lacked two of them, and the same went for LPK, I guess.So even if LPK would play its main team, and R.O.C would use theirs, Im 99% sure that the outcome would still be the same. -
WOO MATEY. ROLL ON THE EXCUSESS PLEASSEEE!
Doughner went huge, and now i think when i see ''Top Snipers In Game'' thread, Doughners name will definately be showing up abit more.
This shows that ROC > LPK. But not EU > NA because if ROC were the only good European team, then there would be no point! :L
Still, i like the excuses; Ozzzzzz is even better than i imagined he would be, and even that was high -
I have to agree with you there. But, even if roc had solid players, it dosen't mean they are the best they could come up with. Imo the best roster R.O.C could use is rufus, xerath, doughner, phong, and kive.They lacked two of them, and the same went for LPK, I guess.So even if LPK would play its main team, and R.O.C would use theirs, Im still 99% sure the outcome would be the same.
The game would have been much closer, the drop off of skill from LPK's main 5 to LPK with 2 subs is insane. The drop off of ROC is noticeable, but not that big of a deal.
Just saying, it would have been a closer game imo. -
EU, is usually a dominating force in many fps games... however I really dont think its fair to judge anyone on one match... If this game grows to the point where theirs yearly international competitions ones where EU is invited mind you, then perhaps we can start drawing conclusions...
I'm not here to make excuses, I'm just pointing out the obvious... LPK didn't have there starting lineup with 2 members missing the first map one on the second, on top of this they were missing there leader and I believe strat caller correct me if i'm wrong...
this really shouldn't be argued either way... ROC won deal with it
The next DOMINATING FORCE IN THIS GAME WILL BE THE ROMANIANS ,just w8 till my boyz get back in business! -
The game would have been much closer, the drop off of skill from LPK's main 5 to LPK with 2 subs is insane. The drop off of ROC is noticeable, but not that big of a deal.
Just saying, it would have been a closer game imo.
well looking on the bright side, i still have never lost to a european team. -
The game would have been much closer, the drop off of skill from LPK's main 5 to LPK with 2 subs is insane. The drop off of ROC is noticeable, but not that big of a deal.
Just saying, it would have been a closer game imo.
Yea I agree with that.The next DOMINATING FORCE IN THIS GAME WILL BE THE ROMANIANS ,just w8 till my boyz get back in business!
Love you vlad!
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 736 CrossFire Announcements
- 730 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 333 Community
- 12 Modes
- 397 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 89 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 17 Looking for a Team?
- 530 CrossFire Support
- 8 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 38 CrossFire Off Topic