Quick question about signatures.

OldJohn

Signature Permissions Allow BB Code No
Allow HTML No
Allow Smilies Yes
Can Upload Images for Signature No
Can Upload Animated GIF for Signature No


Is that set somewhere in my options or is the default for this forum? I saw the MODs have pictures in their signatures, so why aren't regular users allowed too?

I tried using the and it didnt work so i saw this stuff is disabled. Any particular reason?

iiTwAsLucKoL

Used to be able to on suba.

Now you can not.

SlipknotMKD

yea give us sigs plox

Kawaii_Neko

sigs are disablled because people will post student crap on theirs (some not all, only 98.9%)

ZeusIsMeee

kawaiineko91 wrote: »

sigs are disablled because people will post student crap on theirs (some not all, only 98.9%)

MONKEYSlll

Phillybear

urallgay wrote: »

Used to be able to on suba.

Now you can not.

Which is a pretty lame evolution.

xPeeka_x

Phillybear wrote: »

Which is a pretty lame evolution.

+1


They should at least let people with over 3000posts have siggies. >.> or bring back the karma system.

[dot]

Phillybear wrote: »

Which is a pretty lame evolution.

Evolution at its finest actually.


On Suba, people could handle it.
Here, right now, if any random could sig up, we'd have fifteen hundred bluewaffles.

xPeeka_x

[MOD]dot wrote: »

Evolution at its finest actually.


On Suba, people could handle it.
Here, right now, if any random could sig up, we'd have fifteen hundred bluewaffles.

Thats the point in making a Requirement..


Maybe adding thanks buttons. Or karma.


Or making for you to have to become an Earl. Simple ways of making requirements. >.>


Cmon now. It isnt that hard to make a system. ._."

Talonblaze

xPikachu_x wrote: »

Thats the point in making a Requirement..

Maybe adding thanks buttons. Or karma.

Or making for you to have to become an Earl. Simple ways of making requirements. >.>

Cmon now. It isnt that hard to make a system. ._."

Difference between making a system and making a system that won't be overly abused.

Thanks/Karma system; create alts to farm it to gain enough rep to gain the use of signatures.

Post Count; Remember the Military Intelligence Ribbon? Thats all I'm going to say.

ChocDrizzle

[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »

Difference between making a system and making a system that won't be overly abused.

Thanks/Karma system; create alts to farm it to gain enough rep to gain the use of signatures.

Post Count; Remember the Military Intelligence Ribbon? Thats all I'm going to say.

Just let us have it with no requirements and ban/infract the people that abuse it.

[dot]

ROFLwhat wrote: »

Just let us have it with no requirements and ban/infract the people that abuse it.

Because we don't have enough to do already..

Talonblaze

ROFLwhat wrote: »

Just let us have it with no requirements and ban/infract the people that abuse it.

Of course, so we can let trollers do so without a problem right? All they have to do is re-create an alt and they are back in business with their abusive signature all over again.

Personally I don't mind some fake sig's like MissWolf's and Lolli's, those are actually allowed to a degree. At least there we can still do some crowd control.

Wizekraker

urallgay wrote: »

Used to be able to on suba.

Now you can not.

well at the moment they not allowed to have signatures,But I read that they planing it to implement it for mature formers (Im assuming post count).When they update the forms.

"We also want to find ways to recognize our veteran and mature contributors by allowing things like signature images for them, and other features." - Saidin

l_Maven_l

If it is implemented it will NOT be for post count. It would be for good reputation, and maturity. If they're going to promote something, they'll want to make the goals of the people wanting them as such that it would improve the community, not turn the site ramped with more spammers.

Nobarai

I know a few site that have a system where you have to be repped enough times first to hit a level before you can start repping other people. Higher ups like Mods and what not automatically start with the ability to rep.

Steeeeeven

Talon's sig is pretty cool, i was wondering if i could get one like that. But now, let's just follow the rules.

Wizekraker

l_Maven_l wrote: »

If it is implemented it will NOT be for post count. It would be for good reputation, and maturity. If they're going to promote something, they'll want to make the goals of the people wanting them as such that it would improve the community, not turn the site ramped with more spammers.

Yeah I see your point, since it would encourage spamming?

WishMunzta

I think it's pretty fair the way it's now.
If we didn't had the system we have now we would've had to scroll down a lot and that's not something you want to do and randy's would really abuse it.

But from what Saidin said only the most mature veteran forumers will be able to put a picture in their sigs. Personally I think Hi, Smily, RunnyRabbit will be the ones that will be able to put a image in their sigs.

Starting with a couple people is better than dozens of them.