to gm's
Comments
-
i guess i overreacted
my fault
it aint easy loosin somethin you worked hard for.
especially if you know the other team dont deserve it.
i agree gm's should def be looking over the replays and changing the teams from excess to adr winning -
[MOD]Delaco wrote: »But I'm asking you, is why should I? I cannot win either way.
Consider the following:
you guys made an 86 page thread over this issue, and were "glad" because of it. Since it was so large, the mod team (the un-payed mod team) had to prune through it. Why should I, a moderator, do something to help users who did nothing but cause me extra work? Why should i stand up to Saidin if you are correct? You have not given me a reason as to why i should spend my free time to appease people who have done nothing but cause me a problem?
And lets say, Even if i do so, i feel he's not "hacking". Then what? more threads and posts. Not much fun.
o0 yeh???? i feel he's not "hacking"???? u FEEL??? u judge some1 BY FEEELING???? hmm..i see wat is it..LOOK AT THE DAMN REPLAY DAWG.....its the FACT and ur not BLIND enough to not see it...we dont care if we lose cuz we knoe that we're better...TIME for new game aDr...this game is full of bs -
o0 yeh???? i feel he's not "hacking"???? u FEEL??? u judge some1 BY FEEELING???? hmm..i see wat is it..LOOK AT THE DAMN REPLAY DAWG.....its the FACT and ur not BLIND enough to not see it...we dont care if we lose cuz we knoe that we're better...TIME for new game aDr...this game is full of bs
delaco all i got to say is owned. -
I watched two rounds. Yes, two rounds. The first, and the second.
Since you Clearly pointed out exactly what they were doing those two rounds
Both rounds, i saw 100% nothing. Zip.
I don't want to hear any excuse about reviewing other rounds, because i was told clearly exactly where i was suppost to look, and i saw nothing. You were sure beyond a shadow of a doubt according to all of you. -
I said first 5 rounds...
No no, you said every round they were doing something. You cannot be wrong, can you?
After all this pleading, are you already going to admit that at least two of the rounds they used nothing?
ps: i wear glasses. -
[MOD]Delaco wrote: »No no, you said every round they were doing something. You cannot be wrong, can you?
After all this pleading, are you already going to admit that at least two of the rounds they used nothing?
..wow delaco...
just cuz u dont see it in the first 2 rounds dont mean they werent...
i can get chams and play first 2 rounds witout and nottice of u seein i hack,but its that odd time in the replay you wonder what is he doin,y is he lookin through walls at other players? -
[MOD]Delaco wrote: »I watched two rounds. Yes, two rounds. The first, and the second.
Since you Clearly pointed out exactly what they were doing those two rounds
Both rounds, i saw 100% nothing. Zip.
I don't want to hear any excuse about reviewing other rounds, because i was told clearly exactly where i was suppost to look, and i saw nothing. You were sure beyond a shadow of a doubt according to all of you.
then u would be BLIND then.....welll keep up with ur JOB...GG GM...archy dont need to try...ur talking to them like ur talking toa deaf person. -
..wow delaco...
just cuz u dont see it in the first 2 rounds dont mean they werent...
i can get chams and play first 2 rounds witout and nottice of u seein i hack,but its that odd time in the replay you wonder what is he doin,y is he lookin through walls at other players?
its cool MIKe ^^ much love...lets move to another game...this game is FULL of BS +GM -
..wow delaco...
just cuz u dont see it in the first 2 rounds dont mean they werent...
i can get chams and play first 2 rounds witout and nottice of u seein i hack,but its that 20-30 seconds in the replay you wonder what is he doin,y is he lookin through walls at other players?
No, he said in every round (including the first and the second), a suspicious activity was occuring. That means, every round something happened. He pointed out two rounds with two seperate specific players. Now, if you all want to admit that nothing can be proved with round 1 and 2, i will continue. -
[MOD]Delaco wrote: »No, he said in every round (including the first and the second), a suspicious activity was occuring. That means, every round something happened. He pointed out two rounds with two seperate specific players. Now, if you all want to admit that nothing can be proved with round 1 and 2, i will continue.
dawg...do u even OPEN ur eyes when ur watching??? OPEN IT!!!!! -
[MOD]Delaco wrote: »No, he said in every round (including the first and the second), a suspicious activity was occuring. That means, every round something happened. He pointed out two rounds with two seperate specific players. Now, if you all want to admit that nothing can be proved with round 1 and 2, i will continue.
i just watched the replay when i got home from school.
i cant remmber when it looked like he was chamming specificly..
but after a while (i think i watched like 4-5 rounds of the first half and then turned it off,cuz it was too obvious)you start to notice why does he keep turnin to the wall? -
i just watched the replay when i got home from school.
i cant remmber when it looked like he was chamming specificly..
but after a while (i think i watched like 4-5 rounds of the first half and then turned it off,cuz it was too obvious)you start to notice why does he keep turnin to the wall?
same...i dont even need to finish the whole replay...
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.6K CrossFire
- 742 CrossFire Announcements
- 740 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 333 Community
- 12 Modes
- 397 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 89 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 17 Looking for a Team?
- 531 CrossFire Support
- 8 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 38 CrossFire Off Topic