Great patch thread

2»

Comments

  • dashDeity wrote: »
    WOGL-usable weapons

    There's going to always be an element of QQ and people who don't like things. It's impossible to please 100% of the people 100% of the time. That being said;

    If WOGL is looking to limit weapons even more than they already have. Or for example something like WEM had what would be considered the "most balanced" and "most classic" selection of guns for their tournament, would this factor in to whether or not you enjoyed the patch.

    If there was an additional 20 weapons put in this patch, WOGL-usable or not, and WOGL decided to limit the gun selection in a future season to say.. 8 guns. Why would this factor in to your enjoyment. Not to mention that if 20 weapons were put in this patch we would end up with the following results:

    a) 20 would never be enough, and everyone would want 21 minimum. I mean wow, if you're going to put 20 guns in you might as well put 21 in. So fail.

    b) They would never be of the right kind of weapons. OMG you put 20 weapons in, why couldn't you at least make one of them some sort of melee weapon. Why would you ever want to put that many weapons in and not add in a sledgehammer. I mean really z8. Such Fail.

    c) You wouldn't get a weapon in the following patch. And if 20 weapons were put in one patch, it might go a full year without a patch (maybe less since we added way more than 20 weapons total in the game last year). But needless to say, 20 weapons would mean a few patches without them. And then we would be so failing because if we put 20 weapons in one patch then of course we have to put 75 weapons in the next patch right?

    So having said even that; competitive material is something we are always looking to provide. But what from a weapon content perspective specifically does the game need more of to be "more competitive"? (and this is speaking specifically to NEW CONTENT)

    Similarly. What, from a map perspective, does the game need in addition to the already abundant selection of SnD Maps. (In Fact SnD still makes up one of the majority of modes for % of maps)
  • MegasAngel wrote: »
    Hero mode looks dumb..just saying..(my own personal opinion)

    I sure hope there is something interesting...

    Mega's Angel

    are you still alive?:O
  • [GM]Saidin wrote: »
    There's going to always be an element of QQ and people who don't like things. It's impossible to please 100% of the people 100% of the time. That being said;

    If WOGL is looking to limit weapons even more than they already have. Or for example something like WEM had what would be considered the "most balanced" and "most classic" selection of guns for their tournament, would this factor in to whether or not you enjoyed the patch.

    If there was an additional 20 weapons put in this patch, WOGL-usable or not, and WOGL decided to limit the gun selection in a future season to say.. 8 guns. Why would this factor in to your enjoyment. Not to mention that if 20 weapons were put in this patch we would end up with the following results:

    a) 20 would never be enough, and everyone would want 21 minimum. I mean wow, if you're going to put 20 guns in you might as well put 21 in. So fail.

    b) They would never be of the right kind of weapons. OMG you put 20 weapons in, why couldn't you at least make one of them some sort of melee weapon. Why would you ever want to put that many weapons in and not add in a sledgehammer. I mean really z8. Such Fail.

    c) You wouldn't get a weapon in the following patch. And if 20 weapons were put in one patch, it might go a full year without a patch (maybe less since we added way more than 20 weapons total in the game last year). But needless to say, 20 weapons would mean a few patches without them. And then we would be so failing because if we put 20 weapons in one patch then of course we have to put 75 weapons in the next patch right?

    So having said even that; competitive material is something we are always looking to provide. But what from a weapon content perspective specifically does the game need more of to be "more competitive"? (and this is speaking specifically to NEW CONTENT)

    Similarly. What, from a map perspective, does the game need in addition to the already abundant selection of SnD Maps. (In Fact SnD still makes up one of the majority of modes for % of maps)

    Spoken as a true genius
  • dashDeity wrote: »
    *Sarcasm*

    Before all the other fail patch threads come along:



    Once again no SND material, WOGL-usable weapons, or anything for the competitive community. No January patch. Hero mode is basically another MM, and who wants a gold gatling gun.

    Best thing is gonna be K-2 bug fix, which is nothing new, just fixing one of many problems in this game.

    GG ;)

    U took the words out of my mouth sir.
  • Wesssyyy wrote: »
    U took the words out of my mouth sir.

    And your brain by the sounds of it
  • dashDeity wrote: »
    *Sarcasm*

    Before all the other fail patch threads come along:



    Once again no SND material, WOGL-usable weapons, or anything for the competitive community. No January patch. Hero mode is basically another MM, and who wants a gold gatling gun.

    Best thing is gonna be K-2 bug fix, which is nothing new, just fixing one of many problems in this game.

    GG ;)

    I'd like to see how you'd handle all the problems they have, you would probably only ban BRs and Turks because SOME hack and lagg
  • I'd like to see how you'd handle all the problems they have, you would probably only ban BRs and Turks because SOME hack and lagg
    Lets not go down that road.

    I'm just confused at the M4-Cex being a ZP right along with the regular M4-C...
  • Lets not go down that road.

    I'm just confused at the M4-Cex being a ZP right along with the regular M4-C...

    It's limited edition, the M4-Cex won't be around forever, so I guess it's fine for the M4-Cex be temporary available.
  • haven't checked things out it, but i was expecting a SND map...
  • D_Phoenix wrote: »
    It's limited edition, the M4-Cex won't be around forever, so I guess it's fine for the M4-Cex be temporary available.
    Wasn't aware it was an LE wep.

    But judging from the history of other "rare" weps, it'll probably get re-added sometime down the road...
  • em0tioN wrote: »
    haven't checked things out it, but i was expecting a SND map...

    Why? Do you expect one every patch?

    People need to lower their expectations in life.
  • Hm is a fail like Mm....

    the only good thing in this patch is the update in the ha.cks...and this will be gone in some weeks when the ha.cks sites release new vips...

    updating the ha,cks and fighting cheating should not be associated with the realease of new content for the game...

    you guys should have updated the ha.cks weeks ago...

    only some people like Hm... but everyone enjoys a clean game...
  • why does my crossfire patch or what so ever do they call it
    what will i do i will download it or what

    because im just a begginer and i dont no how
  • They said that they haven't announced everything about the patch. Wait and see...maybe they made the M12s-Custom Nuke.
    and Scar Light red dragon scope gold custom adv camo...

  • People need to lower their expectations in life.

    I have lowered my expectations for CF patches, the best thing about them now is probably the artwork.
  • They said that they haven't announced everything about the patch. Wait and see...maybe they made the M12s-Custom Nuke.

    M12s custom nuke?...
    what is that 0_o???
  • This patch fails son much, no gp weapons, no new characters, another boring mode...
    well
  • I think that it was a good patch, I just think they got everybody too excited about it lol.