K2 VS QBZ !!! which is better

QBZ is better for people who cam aim right the first time, because after the first burst the fire pattern goes to hell. K2 is pretty good but slow.

K2 is better

It sure is!

SmexxyCat wrote: »

You are someone else's headshot machine.

O RLY? Bytes
QBZ is a good and decent gun, but I believe has more recoil

I dont have k2,i have QBZ

K2 is slow reload and firing rate that packs apunch,it has virtually no recoil and is good for beginners

QBZ is a difficult one,i is fast(er) firing rate with semi-fast reload rate,now it has the weird recoil i've EVER seen,i goes left to right but at different times everytime,QBZ is good for people who can one-shot AKA pros

k2 is weak i sold mine tryin 2 get an ak now, get the qbz man if you can aim well.

K-2 vs. QBZ-95

K-2:
It has really nice stability and accuracy even while moving. The fire rate may be a bit slow but the recoil isn't that bad and so is the fire rate itself. Strafing would be the best thing to do with the K-2, but spraying makes the K-2 hit everything around the crosshair. The reload can be a bit annoying if you are in a wide open space.

QBZ-95:
First shots would probably be the feature for this gun, because after about 2 or 3 shots the spraying can get really hard to control in the hands of a QBZ newcomer. Firing mobility isn't that great except for charging in a straight line, making you open to snipers. The reload is the same speed of an MP5, so there's a small chance you get reload-killed. Crouching and 3-shot bursting (do the best you can with it) would be your best bet.

---

Just because I'm a knifer doesn't mean I don't know about guns.

CptJ4cK wrote: »

Between them : i dont know...

I would tell you to get M4A1. (45K GP) This gun rocks.

ya m4 FTW, or maybe ak