New option- bets
I got this idea. But dont flame it...
what if we could have an option to bet?
like gammble.
befoure going into game u choose a room and click on other player for a bet.
they both choose a gun or spray etc. (even gp/zp)
and the one at the end of the game with better k/d ratio would won and got the weapons (other bets...) etc.
DONT FLAME, ITS JUST MY SUGGESTION...
reply soon.
what if we could have an option to bet?
like gammble.
befoure going into game u choose a room and click on other player for a bet.
they both choose a gun or spray etc. (even gp/zp)
and the one at the end of the game with better k/d ratio would won and got the weapons (other bets...) etc.
DONT FLAME, ITS JUST MY SUGGESTION...
reply soon.
Comments
-
[MOD]Delaco wrote: »I don't mind the idea of betting, i kind of like it personally. But betting between two players K/D would lead to alot of unhappy players/kicks from the current kicking system
well i just suggested k/d ratio, but maybe bets could be won on other way?
thx for liking my idea. : ) -
jeanGOroar wrote: »I got this idea. But dont flame it...
what if we could have an option to bet?
like gammble.
befoure going into game u choose a room and click on other player for a bet.
they both choose a gun or spray etc. (even gp/zp)
and the one at the end of the game with better k/d ratio would won and got the weapons (other bets...) etc.
DONT FLAME, ITS JUST MY SUGGESTION...
reply soon.
xD Kinda like it, but i doubt they would approve this.
Ex. GR AND BL places bets(Things etc.)
Then GR WINS, so all the bets of BL will be distributed to GR?? xD -
xD Kinda like it, but i doubt they would approve this.
Ex. GR AND BL places bets(Things etc.)
Then GR WINS, so all the bets of BL will be distributed to GR?? xD
no betz are only between 2 players.
ex.: player 1 and player 2
and bet goes to the one who has better k/d ratio
thx 4 liking this idea. -
This has been suggested before, and here's the answer I gave:
If we had a fully honest playerbase, having the ability to bet money, guns, whatever, would be very cool and a lot of fun. Unfortunatly...we don't. People would abuse this left and right. You think the farmers are bad now? How about when they can keep creataing new death-bots whom they "bet" for all the money, and then shoot. How about the hackers who wait on some unsuspecting gunner to come along and do what they can to wipe them out. How about all the kicking nubs? There's no honesty and gamesmanship here. (Okay, there is, there's just not enough.)
It's a fun idea. It just won't work here.
-
This has been suggested before, and here's the answer I gave:
If we had a fully honest playerbase, having the ability to bet money, guns, whatever, would be very cool and a lot of fun. Unfortunatly...we don't. People would abuse this left and right. You think the farmers are bad now? How about when they can keep creataing new death-bots whom they "bet" for all the money, and then shoot. How about the hackers who wait on some unsuspecting gunner to come along and do what they can to wipe them out. How about all the kicking nubs? There's no honesty and gamesmanship here. (Okay, there is, there's just not enough.)
It's a fun idea. It just won't work here.
this is the reason it will never happen. ever.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 3.6K CrossFire
- 791 CrossFire Announcements
- 783 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 734 Community
- 158 Modes
- 438 Suggestions
- 43 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 194 CF Competitive Forum
- 12 CFCL
- 19 Looking for a Team?
- 597 CrossFire Support
- 21 Suggestion
- 20 CrossFire Guides
- 43 CrossFire Off Topic