So let's say...
So let's say you're in your stereotypical Egypt TD room with a hacker, a bunch of BR's, a few pros and a bunch of noobs screaming "KICK HAKK HAKK F11" at you.
The hacker (not on your team) has been blatantly hacking the entire game (wall hack, aimbot, one-hit). The current KDR ratio of the hacker in game is 32/56. There is one (1) minute left on the clock. A vote kick is started to kick the hacker.
Remember, the hacker is actually making his team lose with his negative ratio.
Do you F11 or not?
The hacker (not on your team) has been blatantly hacking the entire game (wall hack, aimbot, one-hit). The current KDR ratio of the hacker in game is 32/56. There is one (1) minute left on the clock. A vote kick is started to kick the hacker.
Remember, the hacker is actually making his team lose with his negative ratio.
Do you F11 or not?
Comments
-
If its obvious that the player is hacking I'll F11.
I always kick hackers on my team when I find them, even if we're losing.
Hacking is cheating and I can't stand cheaters.
Hate the mentality most BRs have in this game.
Its always about what gives them the advantage and nothing to do with sportsmanship or fair play. If a player is doing well on the other team they'll hack accuse and request their kick constantly. If they get a very obvious hacker on their team they will refuse to kick them intill that last round and kick anyone that tries to kick the hacker before then.
And the ones that hack accuse the hardest always seem to have a minor hack themselves.
Hypocrites, Kick abusing, hack accusing liars. Only thinking about winning and nothing else.GodsGunman wrote: »^This.
Annoys me when people have the "you kick your hacker first" mentality, especially when I'm involved and already tried but it gets declined.
I've had hackers hack well saying they will only stop if we kick our hacker many times.
Thing is the person they are hack accusing is rarely ever hacking. -
Nothing was stated on what the team scores were.
If anything, the question should be... IF the vote doesn't result in the hacker being kicked... is it worth staying in that room yourself?
Personally, if the scores were close together, then I'll stay and attempt to win it for the biscuit.
If the scores were FAR apart, and/or the hacker started increasing the rate of kills he'd get, then no, I'll just bug out and refuse to be his own cow.
OT: I'll do f11 BECAUSE he's a hacker. I'll even go further and save the replay and report him for such blatant hacking. -
Nothing was stated on what the team scores were.
If anything, the question should be... IF the vote doesn't result in the hacker being kicked... is it worth staying in that room yourself?
Personally, if the scores were close together, then I'll stay and attempt to win it for the biscuit.
If the scores were FAR apart, and/or the hacker started increasing the rate of kills he'd get, then no, I'll just bug out and refuse to be his own cow.
OT: I'll do f11 BECAUSE he's a hacker. I'll even go further and save the replay and report him for such blatant hacking.
I report any obvious 1st lieutenants or higher that I see hacking, anything lower then that and it's next to pointless because of the ease that they can make another account. -
It's all about credibility, if your someone who takes the time to give a reason and use proper grammar then you will be heard. If your someone who just says hack or f11, then people may not hear you out or assume your just complaining because you died.
-
TruthHurtsU wrote: »no, this is patrick
A Prisoners Dilemma is a social science scenario to help explain and study human nature.
2 or a group of people are given 2 options.
1. Cooperate with each other.
2. Betray the other(s).
If both/all/most cooperate, everyone benefits.
If one/some/few betray, the betrayers benefit and everyone else is harmed.
If all/most betray, everyone is harmed even more.
Its usually played with 2 people but has been modified for groups as well.
The irritated part means not only is the game being played repetitively, but the players know the past actions of the other players as well.
I called it a Irritated Prisoners Dilemma because of the scenario we're in now.
No one kicks the hackers because they want to win or fight the other teams hackers.
If everyone kicked hackers on sight (Cooperate), then the game becomes nearly hack free.
If a small group works together to cheat (Betray), then they benefit but the rest suffer for it.
If everyone supports cheating (All Betray) then the game becomes a hack fest. -
If you're hacking and have a negative kill death ratio, then you're obviously not cut out to play this game.
In a random egypt pub I can put myself positive just by using my touchpad on the laptop.
So if a hacker was going negative, then he obviously deserves to keep his bad KDR as a merit for his weakass skills. I wouldn't purposely F12 it, instead I'd just pretend as if I did not see the kick. -
When there is a hacker i press f11 directly or i kick him..But kicks nevers works ...Exemple :
8-6 Denied
9-7 Denied
2-1 Denied
4-3 Denied
o.O explain me this xP
I saw VATAV explain it somewhere on the forums, the developers basically wanted an f11 rate of as close to 60% as possible.
Categories
- All Categories
- 2 Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 957 CrossFire Announcements
- 950 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 602 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 705 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic