How do they get their "Facts" this wrong?

It's because they're terrible and pretty obviously use no effort in their reviews, then at the end of them jokingly complain about how long the review took.


Thanks for giving credit where it was due btw

I've asked them many times how they test the guns but never been given a answer.
I suspect they just take the gun to a random pup and use what ever numbers they see when they shoot someone.
A pup environment is the last thing you want for precise data collection. The targets are moving and don't know about the experiment, Pings and FPS can be unstable making shots not register or hit somewhere else even if it appears to hit somewhere, and one is also being shot at and even killed well trying to collect data.

They only things usually correct in their videos are the spray pattern explanations (usually).